WAS LABOUR REALLY THAT BAD OR WAS THE ELECTION RIGGED FROM THE START?

In my opinion (and I followed the election fairly intensely on the internet and the T.V) propaganda and fear was a large part of the reason Labour lost, but Ed Miliband made huge mistakes. Ed Miliband is now spoken about like he was some left wing, weak leader despite the fact that at the start of the campaign he was not much more to the left than the Conservatives. As the campaign went on he started to move to the left probably in order to win votes with the anti Tory majority, but the anti Tory majority still remember Tony Blair and his oil wars, they do not look at Labour as the left wing saviors of the people instead they look at Labour as the Red Tories. “You can not win when you are as left wing as Miliband” so called political experts are claiming, they are wrong and in a way this election has proved them wrong, how?

The Scottish National Party taken nearly every seat in Scotland and they were at least at the start of the campaign much more to the left than Labour, but the Scottish National Party have an advantage, people in Scotland trust them and obviously feel represented by them. After the war in Iraq, the bank bail out and the Labour parties failure to represent “the left wing or the poor” in the past, the masses in England still feel that Labour are not a real alternative to the Conservatives. I am not saying they are exactly the same but when in power Labour were not that different. Labour also turned a blind eye to corporate tax evasion and made deals with news corporation. Having said that I still cannot believe the Tories won, which got me reading and it turns out that 1992 election was very similar, a “late surge of Tory support undetected by the polls” led to a Conservative majority as Wikipedia describes;

 United Kingdom general election, 1992

Polling

Almost every poll leading up to polling day predicted either a hung parliament, with Labour the largest party or a small Labour majority of around 19 to 23. Polls on the last few days before the country voted predicted a very slim Labour majority.

With opinion polls at the end of the campaign showing Labour and the Conservatives neck and neck, the actual election result was a surprise to many in the media and in polling organisations. The apparent failure of the opinion polls to come close to predicting the actual result led to an inquiry by the Market Research Society. Following the election, most opinion polling companies changed their methodology in the belief that a ‘Shy Tory Factor‘ affected the polling.

THE 2015 ISRAELI ELECTION also saw right winged Likud party win after a “late surge in support”

Opposition leader Isaac Herzog concedes election after prime minister recovers from low poll numbers in runup to vote to lead his Likud party to 30 seats in Knesset

Israeli Likud Party supporters react to the exit polls while they wait for the announcement of the first official results of Israel’s parliamentary elections.

Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s rightwing Likud party has scored a dramatic election victory, surging past its main rival – the centre-left Zionist Union – to win the most seats in the Knesset.

A series of exit polls released at the close of voting on Tuesday night had suggested the Zionist Union and its leader, Isaac Herzog, were neck and neck with Netanyahu.

But by Wednesday morning official results had stretched to a decisive five-seat lead for Likud, making it almost certain that Netanyahu would serve a third consecutive term as prime minister.

Herzog said he had spoken with Netanyahu to congratulate him on his election victory. “A few minutes ago I spoke with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and congratulated him on his achievement and wished him luck,” Herzog told reporters.

He said his leftist Zionist Union party would continue to be an alternative to Netanyahu’s rightwing Likud.

Netanyahu will still have to assemble a coalition government but his seat count means he will be in a far more commanding position as he seeks partners.

A van containing more than 200,000 ballot papers destined for polls in East Sussex has been stolen. The papers had been printed in London and were being taken to two constituencies – Hastings and Rye and Eastbourne – ahead of voting in the general election on 7 May. Metropolitan Police officers alerted both Hastings and Eastbourne councils about the theft in London overnight. Officers found nothing to suggest the van was targeted for its contents. Police told the local authorities they believed it was a coincidence the stolen van contained ballot papers. The theft is still being investigated.

The ballot papers had been printed in London and were heading for Hastings and Rye and Eastbourne – ahead of voting in the general election on 7 May. Police said it was believed the van was parked in Longbridge Road, Dagenham, at about 19:30. The theft was discovered at about 06:25.

Labour had been expected to win in Hastings and RyeHastings & Rye – Lord Ashcroft Polls. In Hastings and Rye, the Conservative candidate Amber Rudd surprisingly won with 22,686 votes with Sarah Owen, Labour’s candidate, receiving 17,890 votes.
Sounds dodgy.

The Independent reporting the news with no bias whatsoever!

Ukip supporters are convinced Nigel Farage’s defeat is a conspiracy

Less than 48 hours after its leader conceded defeat, Ukip supporters have taken to Twitter to vent their frustration at their failure to capture the South Thanet seat – by declaring it was all a set-up.

Angry kippers have used the hashtag #Thanetrigged to accuse the establishment of all sorts of electoral shenanigans to get Nigel Farage out – citing the unusually long time for the votes to be counted and their success in the local elections as evidence.

Farage lost by 2,812 votes to the Conservative candidate Craig Macinklay despite the party gaining a 13 per cent vote share across the country.

But despite this failure Ukip gained overall control of Thanet council in the local election results on Friday – its first in the country.

They have jumped on a tweet sent by Spectator columnist Isabel Hardman tweeted at 12:30am on election night that Farage may have lost, six hours before the votes were counted, as “proof” the result was a foregone conclusion.

Demanding to know why ballot papers were allegedly “missing” for seven hours, Ukip voters vowed to expose the conspiracy and called for a by-election on social media.

This prompted a brilliant response from Twitter users, including Hardman herself:

The conspiracy comes despite claims from the man himself that he had lost the poll.

Speaking to Kent Online on Friday he said: “I knew the result yesterday [Thursday]. I could see the wards in Broadstairs were 80% turnouts and people queuing to vote. I spoke to people and they were saying ‘look Nigel, we love you but we can’t have Nicola Sturgeon running the country.’”

But who knows? Maybe they were just Conservative hired shills disguised as Thanet voters.

The truth is out there.

READ MORE.

Concerns over ballot rigging after last-minute flood of postal votes

A last-minute deluge of postal votes allegedly sparked concerns about ballot rigging at Milton Keynes Council.

Instead of the anticipated four or five ballot boxes, 18 brimming boxes containing more than 4,600 votes turned up at the council offices yesterday.

Today election organisers insisted nothing seemed amiss – and blamed postal delays caused by the bank holiday.

 They are, however, awaiting with interest to see how many more posted votes arrive before the 10pm deadline today, say sources.
The Wednesday deluge was so unexpected that an email was sent to council staff asking for help in counting the votes. Many volunteers worked well into the night.

A source said: “There was certainly concern and suspicion at one stage. This was more than four times the expected number of papers arriving in one day, and it did not fit in with previous trends.”

Other sources claim helpers were told to check all papers meticulously by hand to check they were genuine.

Other signs of postal vote fraud could include larger than expected numbers of papers returned from one ward or constituency.

Scrap postal votes or elections will be fixed, says judge who warns ballot-rigging is now a ‘probability’ in parts of Britain

  • Judge Richard Marvey, who presides over electoral fraud, made warning
  • He said introducing ‘on demand’ postal voting did not boost turnout
  • But it has opened the electoral system to fraud on ‘an industrial scale’

Fresh voting fraud in scandal-hit borough of Tower Hamlets

Postal ballot papers for Thursday’s general election have been sent out to a block of flats in Tower Hamlets which has been a building site for months

A new outbreak of voting fraud is underway this week in the London borough whose elected mayor was dismissed by a High Court judge for corruption and vote-rigging.

Postal ballot papers for Thursday’s general election have been sent out to a block of flats in Tower Hamlets which has been a building site for months, council records seen by the Telegraph confirm.

The property – owned by Tower Hamlets council – is completely boarded up, surrounded by hoardings and without any sign of habitation.However, letters can still be delivered there. None of the people who supposedly applied for the votes lives at the property and at least one is dead.

 

‘RIGGED UK GENERAL ELECTION’ – MAY 2015

 

WHO YOU VOTING?

UKIP FOR THE WORKING CLASS

If UKIP remove immigrants there will be more jobs for our own boys!

UKIP FOR THE NHS

If UKIP remove immigrants the NHS will not be so busy!

UKIP FOR EDUCATION

Removing immigrants would allow teachers to spend more time with important British children.

UKIP FOR THE ECONOMY

Less scrounging immigrants will give Great Britain a better economy.

UKIP FOR LOWER TAXES

Throwing unemployed immigrants back where they come from would save us having to pay their benefits.

UKIP FOR THE ENVIRONMENT

Less immigrants less pollution.

UKIP FOR BUSINESS

UKIP will continue allowing bankers and corporations exploit people, especially unemployed immigrants!

UKIP ON CRIME

We all know that immigrants are usually criminals.

UKIP FOR THE FUTURE

A future without immigrants.

nigel 1

 

 

 

 

3

LABOUR FOR THE WORKING CLASS

Labour guarantee not to fuck your life up as much as the Tories would.

LABOUR FOR THE NHS

Labour guarantee not to fuck the NHS up as much as the Tories would.

LABOUR FOR EDUCATION

Labour guarantee not to fuck the education system up as much as the Tories would.

LABOUR FOR FAIRNESS

Labour guarantee to be slightly less evil than the Tories and Ed Miliband guarantees he will be slightly less of a irritating, smug hypocrite than David Cameron.

LABOUR FOR BUSINESS

Labour guarantee to force multinational corporations to pay slightly more tax than Tories would.

LABOUR THE ECONOMY

Labour guarantee a slight rise in minimum wage and will pay out slightly more benefits to the sick and the poor than the Tories will.

LABOUR FOR THE FUTURE

Not as slimy and racist as UKIP not as viscous as Conservative not as fair as Tony Benn but not as bad as the rest of them but only slightly better.

ed

 

CONSERVATIVES FOR THE ECONOMY

Conservatives will carry on allowing huge businesses and bankers to do whatever they want, because it benefits the economy.

CONSERVATIVES FOR EDUCATION

A Conservative government would carry on offering young, students with wealthy parents a chance of a fine education, poor people will be kept dumb as possible.

CONSERVATIVES FOR THE NHS

A Conservative pledge more money (again) this time we will, I promise.

CONSERVATIVES FOR BUSINESS

Zero hours, Work for benefits, benefit cuts, cheap wages and tax loopholes businesses will love it.

CONSERVATIVES ON CRIME

Conservative will sweep aside politically correct shit like “human rights” criminals days are numbered unless the criminal wears a suit, criminal bankers must be forgiven.

CONSERVATIVES FOR THE FUTURE

Keeping Thatcherism alive.

cameron 1

 

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS ON THE PAST

 We are SORRY for the past.

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS FOR EDUCATION

We are SORRY for tuition fee lies.

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS FOR LOWER TAXES

Not for you for business, SORRY

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS FOR THE NHS

Nick Clegg is SORRY for the NHS.

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS FOR THE WORKING CLASS

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS would like to say SORRY to the working class

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS FOR THE FUTURE

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS would like to say SORRY for anything we may do in the future that may or may not piss you off.

VOTE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS, SORRY THAT YOU ARE WASTING YOUR TIME READING THIS, SORRY.

2

 

3

 

VOTE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS.

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS ON THE PAST

 We are SORRY for the past.

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS FOR EDUCATION

We are SORRY for tuition fee lies.

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS FOR LOWER TAXES

Not for you for business, SORRY

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS FOR THE NHS

Nick Clegg is SORRY for the NHS.

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS FOR THE WORKING CLASS

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS would like to say SORRY to the working class

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS FOR THE FUTURE

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS would like to say SORRY for anything we may do in the future that may or may not piss you off.

VOTE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS, SORRY THAT YOU ARE WASTING YOUR TIME READING THIS, SORRY.

2

 

VOTE LABOUR.

3

LABOUR FOR THE WORKING CLASS

Labour guarantee not to fuck your life up as much as the Tories would.

LABOUR FOR THE NHS

Labour guarantee not to fuck the NHS up as much as the Tories would.

LABOUR FOR EDUCATION

Labour guarantee not to fuck the education system up as much as the Tories would.

LABOUR FOR FAIRNESS

Labour guarantee to be slightly less evil than the Tories and Ed Miliband guarantees he will be slightly less of a irritating, smug hypocrite than David Cameron.

LABOUR FOR BUSINESS

Labour guarantee to force multinational corporations to pay slightly more tax than Tories would.

LABOUR THE ECONOMY

Labour guarantee a slight rise in minimum wage and will pay out slightly more benefits to the sick and the poor than the Tories will.

LABOUR FOR THE FUTURE

Not as slimy and racist as UKIP not as viscous as Conservative not as fair as Tony Benn but not as bad as the rest of them.

ed