Unilever threatens to pull ads from Facebook and Google if they fail to protect children, promote hate or create division in society.

Unilever are huge their products include foods, beverages, cleaning agents and personal care products. The company owns more than 400 brands, which are organised into four main categories – Foods, Refreshments, Home Care, and Personal Care. Unilever’s current largest-selling brands include: Axe/Lynx, Ben & Jerry’s, Dove, Flora/Becel, Heartbrand, Hellmann’s/Best Foods, Knorr, Lipton, Lux/Radox, Omo/Surf, Rexona/Sure, Sunsilk, TRESemmé, Magnum,Vaseline and VO5.

Unilever is threatening to withdraw its advertising from online platforms such as Facebook and Google if they fail to protect children, promote hate or create division in society.

In a speech, Keith Weed, the Unilever chief marketing officer, said that, as a brand-led business, Unilever “needs its consumers to have trust in our brands”.

He went on to say “Unilever will not invest in platforms or environments that do not protect our children or which create division in society, and promote anger or hate,” he plans to say. “We will prioritise investing only in responsible platforms that are committed to creating a positive impact in society.”

Sounds good of them until we consider who and what Unilever are and what they do.

Global firms behind popular brands such as Kit Kat, Colgate toothpaste and Dove (Unilever) cosmetics use palm oil produced by child workers in dangerous conditions, Amnesty International has claimed.

The human rights organisation traced a range of well-known products back to the palm oil company Wilmar, which it alleged employs children to do back-breaking physical labour on refineries in Indonesia.

Singapore-based Wilmar counts multinational companies including Kellogg’s, Unilever, Colgate-Palmolive, Reckitt Benckiser and Nestlé among its major clients, according to Amnesty.

In a 110-page report accompanied by a video, Amnesty alleged products sold by those companies were “tainted by appalling human rights abuses … with children as young as eight working in hazardous conditions”. So much for “not investing in platforms or environments that do not protect our children or which create division in society.”

The report called on the companies implicated to tell customers whether the palm oil in individual products such as Magnum ice-creams, Ariel detergent, Knorr soup, Pantene shampoo and Aero chocolate bars were made using child labour.

“These findings will shock any consumer who thinks they are making ethical choices in the supermarket when they buy products that claim to use sustainable palm oil,” said the senior Amnesty investigator Meghna Abraham.

“There is nothing sustainable about palm oil that is produced using child labour and forced labour. Something is wrong when nine companies turning over a combined revenue of £260bn in 2015 are unable to do anything about the atrocious treatment of palm oil workers earning a pittance.”

It is not the first time that Unilever has been criticized and exposed for abusing human right laws.

Unilever’s abuses and disregard for human life and human rights is disgraceful and not “creating a positive impact in society.” They also perform cruel tests and experiments on animals. Despite promoting themselves as “anti animal testing” Unilever have been caught using chemicals that have been tested on animals in insanely cruel experiments numerous times.

The hypocrisy that Unilever and Keith Weed are displaying here is shocking. For the record Facebook and Google DO NOT POST ANYTHING. Keith Weed and Unilever are not trying to censor corporate giants they are trying to censor PEOPLE that use Facebook and Google. BOYCOTT UNILEVER FOR GOOD.

THERESA MAY MIGHT MAKE MARGRET THATCHER SEEM LIKE MOTHER TERESA.

Theresa May is a woman that has spent years offending anyone with any sense of compassion and now she is our unelected Prime Minister. I don’t know about you but I would vote to have each one of my limbs removed one by one before I ever vote this psychotic, human right hating, corporate puppet. Obviously Theresa May’s rich friends in the media will not push for an early general election but will instead continue with their immature attacks of the elected by Labour members Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. Jeremy Corbyn is fighting elitist Conservatives that have over the years infiltrated and controlled the Labour Party as well as the elitist Conservative mainstream media when puppets like Theresa May has spent here last few years attacking anyone that is Islamic, Homeless, Poor or Sick. She has also fought against Human Rights and Freedom of speech and expression.

I never understand Conservatives hate of Freedom of speech, conservatives say the most fucked up things I have ever heard and if you don’t like freedom of speech just do us all a favour and stop speaking! Theresa May does not hate the corporate media exercising their rights of freedom of speech and freedom of expression like all conservatives its the poor that they want to silence.

Theresa May will step up internet censorship and anything that exposes the truth, I find it quite terrifying that such a cold-hearted corporate whore has such power despite the fact that NOBODY actually voted for her. I believe Theresa May is a disaster waiting to happen she describes herself as a liberal Conservative but upon reviewing her policies and actions she seems more like your typical, traditional “we are better than the rest” conservative.

The ironic thing is Theresa May might tempt women in Britain to vote her based on the fact she is a woman like Obama with black people, but like Obama does not represent your average black American at all, Theresa May does not represent the average British woman at all. If you are a woman and a millionaire vote Theresa May she represents you perfectly, she will fight for your tax breaks and keep system as it is, rich get richer poor get poorer. However if you are a woman that is not a millionaire and not as financially stable as some vote Jeremy Corbyn, do not think that Theresa May represent women because Theresa May represents her greedy lobby masters and nobody else.

theresa-may

 

BRITAIN IS TOO TOLERANT ACCORDING TO DAVID CAMERON!

“For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens ‘as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone’,” said David Cameron “It’s often meant we have stood neutral between different values. And that’s helped foster a narrative of extremism and grievance” he added on his unbelievable and stupid attack on tolerance.

Speaking on BBC Radio 4 later, however, the Home Secretary Theresa May completely contradicted him and said that tolerance and rule of law were ‘British values’. If tolerance and rule of law are British values and David Cameron stands against them, does that mean that David Cameron stands against British values and should not be tolerated by the British people? If Home Secretary Theresa May and the Conservative party believe rule of law is a British value why are they trying so hard to abolish human right laws, instead of following and abiding them? These are two actions that prove that the Conservative party do stand against some British values, which must mean they the Conservative party are the extremists, in their own words.

On one level I agree with David Cameron, Britain is too tolerant sometimes. The British public tolerate and ignore the corruption, greed and extremism of the British government, we ignore and tolerate their lack of respect for people and their human rights, which they are desperate to destroy. We ignore and tolerate their MPs expenses, secret deals with the media, attacks on freedom of speech (another Great British value) and their general bad and intolerant governing.

Due to the unexpected and dodgy looking election results Britain has five more years of listening to old fashioned, right wingers that claim to represent us spewing hate filled nonsense like this.

I can’t remember him explaining his hate for British tolerance on the TV debates on the build up to the general election, he spent most of that time making promises he has no intention of keeping and telling the Daily Mail, The Sun and other British newspapers what to write judging by the BULLSHIT they wrote. What next? Britain shows too much empathy to people in need, empathy cost the tax payer 15 billion pound a year, that don’t even count sympathy. I am sure David Cameron would like to see things like tolerance, empathy, sympathy and love done away with, its an unnecessary strain that costs too much money, time and effort but unfortunately he is stuck with them!

Tolerance does not always piss David Cameron off, for instance David Cameron claimed that Great Britain should tolerate oil rich Saudi Arabia despite some of their extremism, the extremism and war crimes of Israel should also be tolerated according to our deluded Prime Minister.

181

POLITICAL POSTERS BY WOLVOMAN80.

 

 

There IS a difference between Ed Miliband and David Cameron!
Are all UK political parties the same?
Theresa May on Human right laws.

 

If the Daily Mail was honest.
Nigel Farage: I have never taken drugs but they should be legal.

The Ukip leader says he has never taken drugs himself but that he believes the ‘time has come’ for legalizing ‘certain drugs’

He also said the war on drugs was lost years ago. For once I actually agree with him, making criminals out of drug addicts or experimenters is not the right thing to do, its lazy, judgmental and it doesn’t work, society proves it.

 

 

 

SHOULD CRIMINALS LOSE THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS?

HIV-activists-3

Recently there has been much debate on prisoners and their rights, the European court of human rights rules a voting ban breached rights of 1,015 Britons behind bars but declines to order any monetary damages. Not long back much of the British media exposed prisoners “living a life of luxury” playing PlayStation’s on HD, Flat screen Television’s, the media in Britain were “outraged” as were the mentally enslaved readers. “PlayStation’s for criminals” the self righteous moan “it’s an easy life, they love it in there” they add, but is that true? me personally I have never been to prison but I know a lot of people that have, I have visited people in prison, people that have children and in my experience they definitely did not want to be there and it was not an “easy life” for them in prison as the media report.

I am sure that to a small percentage of people believe prison life is not that bad and maybe some people would rather be in prison than out, receiving 3 meals a day and not worrying about money, but for the rest of us and the vast majority of people prison would be a nightmare and having occasional access the a games console and a television is not going to change that.

Prisoners have already lost their freedom and access to their families, should they lose the right to be entertained, their right to vote and their right to being treated like a Human Being? I do not believe they should, for many reasons, reasons like; Using data from 2014, the total UK prison population is around 86,000. As of 14 November 2014, the population of women in prison in the UK is 3,956. And the male population is 81,905. That is a lot of people in prison and I believe that probably at least half of them should not be there, we should remember that we have all broken the law at some stage in our lives.

Today people are in prison for uploading Hollywood movies onto the internet, shoplifting, elderly people are in prison for not paying Council tax and so are addicts that have been caught with drugs, a car accident can land you in prison as can, a dodgy Facebook comment has landed people in prison and if prisoners lose their Human Rights then we turn into a society that takes away human rights for something a small and ridiculous as a Facebook joke.

I believe the only time their is even a debate for taking prisoners Human Rights is when the prisoner is a known murderer and even then we should be aware that a society that intentionally cruelly treats its prisoners is worse and more dangerous then the criminals, I understand that some people are dangerous to innocent people and therefore need to be taken off the streets for the safety of innocent people but in my opinion once in prison they should still be treated like Human Beings, looked after, feed, entertained with T.V or games consoles, why? because they are Human Beings and even if the criminal laughs at the fact he “has it easy” he would have still lost his freedom, prison had supposed to be about protecting the innocent.

 

FACEBOOK MUST MAKE MONEY ON EVERYTHING.

a116

Recently Facebook have taken over WhatsApp costing them an unbelievable and ridiculous 19 billion dollars. That kind of money could contribute massively towards sorting out some of the worlds problems, problems like poverty, oppression, starvation and supplying the world with water. Instead of this Facebook decide to spend it on eliminating competition, actions and greed like this is just one more example of why corporations like Facebook, Google and Amazon should pay a lot more tax than they do. In my opinion a corporation like Facebook should be taxed at least 80% on their ridiculously massive profit, this would prevent these greedy, bloodsucking, inbred parasites from having an absolute monopoly on the internet and simply taking over their competition.

Google have ruined YouTube and Google plus forces YouTube users/uploaders to have a useless/shit Google plus account. I do not like Facebook or Google and I would much rather not have to use these disgusting, greedy companies but unfortunately they have such of a huge monopoly on the internet that we have no choice. If I were to close my YouTube and Facebook accounts in protest of their lack of respect for our rights, freedom of speech and their disgusting greed, it would make it impossible for my videos to be watched for free or at least mean that I would lose 95% of my audience.

But Facebook, Youtube, Google are now all censoring the web and with the huge monopoly these and a few other corporations now have on the internet they could potentially remove all criticism of themselves from their websites this would completely destroy civil liberties and the masses do not even notice, it is not as if the mainstream media (owned by the same corporations that are ruining the internet) are going to expose themselves instead they will carry on rambling about celebrities private lives. Internet censorship is now happening everyday and they are slowly winning the battle it will not be long before the internet is under control unless we begin to create and use new alternative websites.

Something else that I have noticed is the fact that if I share my download links or a link that sends people to a website that requires payment for example Amazon or Sellfy my post will struggle to reach forty or fifty people! They do this to encourage Facebook users to pay Facebook to spread information that they should not have to pay for but in usual Facebook fashion Facebook decide that people that do not have the money to pay to be heard, should not be heard.

 

PLEASE LET US TAKE YOUR HUMAN RIGHTS, ITS FOR YOUR OWN SAFETY!

We in Great Britain often boast about our country being tolerant and free, a country with equality and freedom, freedom of speech, freedom of expression and equal rights for all, I disagree with this hypothesis.

When I look at Britain I fail to see what the masses see, instead I see a nation of conformists, I see a nation of sad drunks and drug addicts sitting in front of the TV drinking and working and drinking their lives away. I see a nation obsessed with over priced gadgets, football and reality TV, unfortunately reality TV is the only reality they are interested in. I see a nation that our masses stand by and watch as our sick government cut benefits for the sick, disabled and the poor, a nation that believes that people that do not take part in the system should not even to be allowed to eat. I see a nation that watches as our government destroy Iraq, Libya and next Syria, and we then have the nerve to call Muslims terrorists. A nation where the PRIME MINISTER is a known arms dealer and our monarchy have a history of oppression, slavery and war, yet we still worship them. I see a nation that claims to care for children, yet we stand by and watch as corporations like Tesco and Next exploit some of the poorest children in the world, with child labour and slavery, facts like this will not stop the masses from shopping at these sickening companies. I see corruption in the banks, the government, police and the media, I see a nation that is governed by money our politicians are puppets to the banks and corporations.

Poor people are punished and sometimes locked up for minor offences like possession of Cannabis, shop lifting, and not paying taxes when MPs over claim millions and bankers receive huge bonuses despite the banks being bailed out, MPs and bankers are obviously above the law in fact they are the law. The lifestyles of the western world has a negative impact on the lifestyles of many people around the world, but we don’t care, we are to busy watching X factor.

First Published 28/08/2013

PLEASE LET US TAKE YOUR HUMAN RIGHTS, ITS FOR YOUR OWN SAFETY!

Theresa May, most of the British media and the conservative party have started an attack on human right laws, they use examples like Ten “highly dangerous” terror suspects were freed in 2004 after Law Lords ruled their detention without trial breached their human rights, An illegal immigrant from Bolivia was allowed to stay in the UK – because he had a cat and Terror suspect Abu Qatada and eight others were awarded £75,000 for a “breach” of their human rights in 2009. Judges in Strasbourg decided the British Government should never have held them without trial following the attacks on 9/11, saying it violated their right to liberty and security. Taken from the Sun.

Like most laws that we have in Britain Human right laws are not perfect but they are important, there is no doubt that sometimes they do benefit the wrong people but most of the biased corporation controlled mainstream media fail to mention that most of the time human right laws DO protect the right people unlike the corporation controlled British government who bail out banks and allow billion pound corporations huge tax breaks and even free labor paid for by the taxpayer on workfare! which of the human right laws would  Theresa May like to get rid off?  Freedom of expression and conscience? or is it the Right to personal liberty that pisses her off? or no arbitrary searches or seizures? The British media, the American government and the British government have done more harm to this country and the world than Abu Qatada or any terrorist I can think of, the British and American governments kill hundreds of thousand of people in Iraq, and then the British media and the sheeple  have the nerve to moan about Iraqi refuges and immigrants for hating Britain, WAKE UP BRITAIN AND USA, if Iraqi soldiers come to our countries and destroyed our cities, kill our children and steal our natural resources we would hate them to, unfortunately most people in Britain are still failing to see the real terrorist of the world.

Even if Abu Qatada is the dangerous terrorist that our government and media tell us that he is than taking human rights from the whole of Great Britain just because of a very small amount of people would be letting the terrorist’s take our freedom and therefore a sure sign the terrorist are winning the war on terror, but I believe The Sun newspaper, most other sections of the corrupt British media and the British government are attacking human right laws, they are using terrorism as an excuse to weaken human rights. So FUCK THE RACIST PROPAGANDA FILLED SUN Newspaper, Rupert Murdoch, News Corp, David Cameron, Theresa May and FUCK anyone that is stupid enough to believe the BS and biased propaganda they talk, to the people that do believe this BULLSHIT, to whom I say this, learn your lessons from history, you all thought Jimmy Saville was a generous old man because the British media told you he was despite the fact that most of the media knew what Jimmy Saville was like, you also believed there was weapons of mass destruction in Iraq yet the only WMD’s I see are the weapons of mass detraction that are being used by the British Media and most of the British people!Theresa-May_1716248c

First Published 6/9/2013

DAVID CAMERON VS THE INTERNET.

Why does David Cameron hate the Internet?

David Cameron has used every excuse possible to attack the internet, from slowing the spread of information of gangs planning “disorder and crime” to internet porn, he even used the suicide of a 14 year old girl as an excuse to start a attack on free speech online, he calls it a “war on porn” or  “a war on thugs” but anyone that is even slightly capable of critical thinking must consider the chance that these internet attacks are not wars on porn or thugs but in fact they are wars on the internet in general. Why do David Cameron, News Corporation and many others in the so called elite hate the internet? The answer is simple, because the internet show them for the corrupt puppets they really are! The internet embarrasses the mainstream media, the government and the lobbying and tax avoiding corporations, the internet exposes the governments war crimes, the corporations child labor and lack of respect for human rights and the massive levels of propaganda used by our biased media. The internet exposes it all in a way that it has never been exposed before and due to this our governments, monarchies and the world elite are beginning to lose control.

Before the internet it was very hard to spread a message but the internet has changed that, thanks to the internet people like me can have our videos viewed by millions of people all over the world without having to rely on the mainstream media. David Cameron and the mainstream media will make excuses and reasons for why the government should take control of the internet, excuses like but we must protect children or accuse people of spreading hate, but the truth is they do not care about children if they did then why do they not speak against child labor used by Tesco, Next and other British corporations, as for spreading hate, the mainstream media spread more hate then anyone else I can think of, they attack the sick and disabled, the unemployed, immigrants, Muslims even worse the propaganda and lies they print paves the way for oil wars and natural resources wars.David Cameron, Barrack Obama or any government should NOT be allowed to touch the internet.

First Published 13/08/2013

Conservative party are to block “Extremist websites”

When Paul Goggins, a Labour Party member of parliament, asked what Cameron plans to do regarding a warning from the Security Service about “Islamist extremism,” Cameron replied that one of the steps the U.K. is taking is blocking websites. “We have had repeated meetings of the extremism task force – it met again yesterday – setting out a whole series of steps that we will take to counter the extremist narrative, including by blocking online site,” Cameron said before praising Facebook for removing videos of a beheading. “We will take all these steps and many more to keep our country safe.” So David Cameron wants to block Extremist websites, websites that he claims are a threat to our national security. The trouble is David Cameron is the leader of an extremist government, a government that believe in corporate child slavery, poverty, work for benefits and murder for oil and profit. We have an extremist government that attacks the sick and disabled with sick benefit cuts, humiliating work programs telling people that they are protecting the country by censoring the web of the corruption of themselves and many multinational corporations. If “extremist” websites are to be censored, which they already are the conservative governments website should be the first one censored, and Mark Zuckerberg is nothing more than a weak little geek that got lucky by stealing a friends idea, of coarse David Cameron is going to praise Mark Zuckerberg they are a couple of snake eyed weaklings they would not survive for five minutes in the ghettos they are creating.

 

First Published 21/12/2013

Recently the British government have began full blown censorship on social media many political Facebook pages are having their posts hidden, all in a desperate attempt to try to keep control of the people and the internet. The government are panicking and they are not thinking about what they are doing. Why do the British government want to hide political posts? Is it because the internet is FULL of insults and complaints aimed towards our government? In this simple experiment I will write “David Cameron is a ………”  and I will let Google finish the sentence, I will repeat the search with other well known MPs. Google will search millions of pages on the internet and give it’s top four answers, the results are shocking!

First Published 29/3/2014