I AM A RACIST, ANTI-SEMITIC, PRICK! (ACCORDING TO WIKIPEDIA)

I don’t really call myself a truther but I suppose that is what I am, I do not trust the government and media and therefore I look elsewhere for information, sometimes I look on YouTube or most the time bloggers, media and obviously Wikipedia, I am not saying everything on Wikipedia is true but it is a good place to start. I love Wikipedia but some articles are mad, like the other day when I was reading about the Rothchild family. The article tells us that the Rothchild family own banks all over the world and shows us pictures of at least 20 huge mansions that they own all over the world, the article even tells us that some of mansions shown are not the only mansions that they own in the cities that are shown in the article. After the article tells us about this families long history of obscene wealth and greed, the article finishes off with this; Many conspiracy theories about the Rothschild family have been identified as a result of anti-Semitic prejudice reaching back several hundred years, including the era of the Napoleonic wars, and not as a result of valid evidence.

So according to Wikipedia conspiracy theories about the Rothchild family have been identified as being anti-Semitic? The article fails to tell us who identified conspiracy theories about the Rothchild family as anti-Semitc but apparently it as been anti-Semitc since the Napoleonic wars. I am glad Wikipedia cleared that up for me, here I am calling myself a truther when actually I have already been identified as an anti-Semitic, ignorant, racist prick. Well if that is the case I best STFU and stop posting this racist shit. BELOW IS THE WHOLE ARTICLE I decided to copy and paste just in case it gets changed.

 

 

“House of Rothschild” redirects here. For the film, see The House of Rothschild. For other uses, see Rothschild (disambiguation).

The Rothschild family
Coat of arms of the Rothschild family

Ethnicity Ashkenazi Jewish
Current region Monaco, Luxembourg, France, Austria, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Germany, United Kingdom, United States, Cayman Islands
Place of origin Free City of Frankfurt,The Holy Roman Empire
Notable members Mayer Amschel RothschildNathan Mayer Rothschild
Distinctions Barons (European nobility)
Traditions Goût Rothschild
Name origin and meaning German for “red shield”

A Rothschild house, Waddesdon Manor in Waddesdon, Buckinghamshire, donated to charity by the family in 1957.

A house formerly belonging to the Viennese branch of the family (Schillersdorf Palace).

Schloss Hinterleiten, one of the many palaces built by the Austrian Rothschild dynasty. Donated to charity by the family in 1905.

Beatrice de Rothschild’s villa on theCôte d’Azur, France

Château de Montvillargenne. A Rothschild family house in Picardy, France.

The Rothschild family is a family descending from Mayer Amschel Rothschild, a court Jew to the German Landgraves of Hesse-Kassel, in the Free City of Frankfurt, who established his banking business in the 1760s.[1] Unlike most previous court Jews, Rothschild managed to bequeath his wealth, and established an international banking family through his five sons.[2]

Five lines of the Austrian branch of the family have been elevated to Austrian nobility, being given five hereditary titles of Barons of the Habsburg Empire by Emperor Francis II in 1816. Another line, of the British branch of the family, was elevated by Queen Victoria, who granted two hereditary titles of Baronet (1847) and Baron which ennobled the family (1885).[3][page needed][4][not in citation given]

During the 19th century, when it was at its height, the Rothschild family is believed by some to have possessed the largest private fortune in the world, as well as the largest private fortune in modern world history.[4][5][6] The family’s wealth is believed to have subsequently declined, as it was divided amongst hundreds of descendants.[7] Today, Rothschildbusinesses are far less well known than they were throughout the 19th century, although they encompass a diverse range of fields, including finance, real estate, mining, energy, mixed farming, wine, and charities.[8][9]

Family overview[edit]

The first member of the family who was known to use the name “Rothschild” was Izaak Elchanan Rothschild, born in 1577. The name means “Red Shield” in German. The family’s ascent to international prominence began in 1744, with the birth of Mayer Amschel Rothschild in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. He was the son of Amschel Moses Rothschild, (born circa 1710),[10] amoney changer who had traded with the Prince of Hesse. Born in the “Judengasse“, the ghetto of Frankfurt, Mayer developed a finance house and spread his empire by installing each of his five sons in the five main European financial centres to conduct business. The Rothschild coat of arms contains a clenched fist with five arrows symbolizing the five dynasties established by the five sons of Mayer Rothschild, in a reference to Psalm 127: “Like arrows in the hands of a warrior, so are the children of one’s youth.” The family motto appears below the shield:Concordia, Integritas, Industria (Unity, Integrity, Industry).[11]

Paul Johnson writes “[T]he Rothschilds are elusive. There is no book about them that is both revealing and accurate. Libraries of nonsense have been written about them… A woman who planned to write a book entitled Lies about the Rothschilds abandoned it, saying: ‘It was relatively easy to spot the lies, but it proved impossible to find out the truth.’” He writes that, unlike the court Jews of earlier centuries, who had financed and managed European noble houses, but often lost their wealth through violence or expropriation, the new kind of international bank created by the Rothschilds was impervious to local attacks. Their assets were held in financial instruments, circulating through the world as stocks, bonds and debts. Changes made by the Rothschilds allowed them to insulate their property from local violence: “Henceforth their real wealth was beyond the reach of the mob, almost beyond the reach of greedy monarchs.”[12]Johnson argued that their fortune was generated to the greatest extent by Nathan Mayer Rothschild in London; however, more recent research by Niall Ferguson indicates that greater and equal profits also were realised by the other Rothschild dynasties, including James Mayer de Rothschild in Paris, Carl Mayer von Rothschild in Naples and Amschel Mayer Rothschild in Frankfurt.[13]

Another essential part of Mayer Rothschild’s strategy for future success was to keep control of their banks in family hands, allowing them to maintain full secrecy about the size of their fortunes. In about 1906, the Jewish Encyclopedia noted: “The practice initiated by the Rothschilds of having several brothers of a firm establish branches in the different financial centers was followed by other Jewish financiers, like the BischoffsheimsPereiresSeligmansLazards, and others, and these financiers by their integrity and financial skill obtained credit not alone with their Jewish confrères, but with the banking fraternity in general. By this means Jewish financiers obtained an increasing share of international finance during the middle and last quarter of the nineteenth century. The head of the whole group was the Rothschild family…”. It also states: “Of more recent years, non-Jewish financiers have learned the same cosmopolitan method, and, on the whole, the control is now rather less than more in Jewish hands than formerly.”[14]

Mayer Rothschild successfully kept the fortune in the family with carefully arranged marriages, often between first or second cousins (similar to royal intermarriage). By the late 19th century, however, almost all Rothschilds had started to marry outside the family, usually into the aristocracy or other financial dynasties.[15] His sons were:

The German family name “Rothschild” is pronounced approximately rawt-shilt in German, not roth(s)-chyld as it is in English. The surname “Rothschild” is common in Germany, and the vast majority of the bearers of the name are unrelated to this family. Moreover, the German surnames “Rothschild” and “Rothchild” are not related to the Protestant surname “Rothchilds” from the United Kingdom.

Families by country:

The Napoleonic Wars[edit]

A landmark Rothschild Palace inFrankfurt, Germany, Villa Günthersburg (photographed 1855)

The Rothschilds already possessed a significant fortune before the start of the Napoleonic Wars (1803–1815), and the family had gained preeminence in the bullion trade by this time.[16]From London in 1813 to 1815, Nathan Mayer Rothschild was instrumental in almost single-handedly financing the British war effort, organizing the shipment of bullion to the Duke of Wellington‘s armies across Europe, as well as arranging the payment of British financial subsidies to their continental allies. In 1815 alone, the Rothschilds provided £9.8 million (in 1815 currency, about £566 million, €717 million or US$869 million today, when using the retail price index, and £6.58 billion, €8,34 billion or US$10.1 billion when using average earnings) in subsidy loans to Britain’s continental allies.[17]

One of the smaller city houses, Vienna. A collection of far larger Viennese palaces known as Palais Rothschild were torn down during the Second World War.

The brothers helped coordinate Rothschild activities across the continent, and the family developed a network of agents, shippers, and couriers to transport gold across war-torn Europe. The family network was also to provide Nathan Rothschild time and again with political and financial information ahead of his peers, giving him an advantage in the markets and rendering the house of Rothschild still more invaluable to the British government.

In one instance, the family network enabled Nathan to receive in London the news of Wellington’s victory at the Battle of Waterloo a full day ahead of the government’s official messengers.[16] Rothschild’s first concern on this occasion was to the potential financial advantage on the market which the knowledge would have given him; he and his courier did not immediately take the news to the government.[16] It was then repeated in later popular accounts, such as that of Morton.[18][19] The basis for the Rothschild’s most famously profitable move was made after the news of British victory had been made public. Nathan Rothschild calculated that the future reduction in government borrowing brought about by the peace would create a bounce in British government bonds after a two-year stabilisation, which would finalise the post-war restructuring of the domestic economy.[17][18][19] In what has been described as one of the most audacious moves in financial history, Nathan immediately bought up the government bond market, for what at the time seemed an excessively high price, before waiting two years, then selling the bonds on the crest of a short bounce in the market in 1817 for a 40% profit. Given the sheer power of leverage the Rothschild family had at their disposal, this profit was an enormous sum.[17]

Nathan Mayer Rothschild initially started his business in Manchester in 1806, and gradually moved it to London, where in 1809 he acquired the location at 2 New Court in St. Swithin’s Lane,City of London,[16] where it operates today; he established N M Rothschild & Sons in 1811. In 1818, he arranged a £5 million (equal to £320 million in 2014) loan to the Prussian government, and the issuing of bonds for government loans formed a mainstay of his bank’s business. He gained a position of such power in the City of London that by 1825–6 he was able to supply enough coin to the Bank of England to enable it to avert a market liquidity crisis.

International high finance[edit]

“I have not the nerve for his operations. They are well-planned, with great cleverness and adroitness in execution – but he is in money and funds what Napoleon was in war.” —Baron Baring on Nathan Rothschild[20]

Mentmore Towers, one of the many Rothschild mansions built inBuckinghamshire

“… your friends at the West End have the business in their hands to decide between Portugal & Brazil and an early intimation from you may serve us materially.”—Samuel Phillips & Co to Nathan Rothschild[21]

The family financed the creation of the country Rhodesia, and it became the site of the first international expansion of one of their mining enterprises—the Rio Tinto mining company.

In 1816, four of the brothers were each elevated to the hereditary nobility by Austrian Emperor Francis I; moreover, a fifth brother, Nathan, was elevated in 1818. All of them were granted the Austrian title of baron or Freiherr on 29 September 1822. As such, some members of the family used “de” or “von” Rothschild to acknowledge the grant of nobility. Barons (Knights) who received their title from the Holy Roman Emperor or, after Holy Roman Empire’s 1806 dissolution under Franz/Francis II, from the Austrian and later Austro-Hungarian Emperor are known as “Barons of the [Holy Roman] Empire”, Reichsfreiherren, although the title is sometimes shortened to Freiherr.

In 1847, Sir Anthony de Rothschild was made a hereditary baronet of the United Kingdom. In 1885, Nathan Mayer Rothschild II (1840–1915) of the London branch of the family, was granted the hereditary peerage title Baron Rothschild in the Peerage of the United Kingdom.

The Frankfurt terminus of the Taunus railroad, financed by the Rothschilds. Opened in 1840, it was one of Germany’s first railroads.

Rothschild family banking businesses pioneered international high finance during the industrialization of Europe and were instrumental in supporting railway systems across the world and in complex government financing for projects such as the Suez Canal. During the 19th century, the family bought up a large proportion of the property in Mayfair, London.

The Rothschild family was directly involved in the Independence of Brazil from Portugal in the early 19th century. Upon an agreement, the Brazilian government should pay a compensation of two million pounds sterling to the Kingdom of Portugal to accept Brazil’s independence.[21] N M Rothschild & Sons was pre-eminent in raising this capital for the government of the newly formed Empire of Brazil on the London market. In 1825, Nathan Rothschild raised £2,000,000, and indeed was probably discreetly involved in the earlier tranche of this loan which raised £1,000,000 in 1824.[21][22] Part of the price of Portuguese recognition of Brazilian independence, secured in 1825, was that Brazil should take over repayment of the principal and interest on a £1,500,000 loan made to the Portuguese government in 1823 by N M Rothschild & Sons.[21] A correspondence from Samuel Phillips & Co. in 1824 suggests the close involvement of the Rothschilds in the occasion.

Major 19th century businesses founded with Rothschild family capital include:

The family funded Cecil Rhodes in the creation of the African colony of Rhodesia. From the late 1880s onwards, the family took over control of the Rio Tinto mining company.

The Japanese government approached the London and Paris families for funding during the Russo-Japanese War. The London consortium’s issue of Japanese war bonds would total £11.5 million (at 1907 currency rates; £1.03 billion in 2012 currency terms).[24]

The name of Rothschild became synonymous with extravagance and great wealth, and the family was renowned for its art collecting, for its palaces, as well as for its philanthropy. By the end of the century, the family owned, or had built, at the lowest estimates, over 41 palaces, of a scale and luxury perhaps unparalleled even by the richest royal families.[17] The soon to be British Prime Minister Lloyd George claimed, in 1909, that Lord Nathan Rothschild was the most powerful man in Britain.[4][not in citation given][25]

In 1901, with no male heir, the Frankfurt House closed its doors after more than a century in business. It was not until 1989 that the family returned, when N M Rothschild & Sons, the British investment arm, plus Bank Rothschild AG, the Swiss branch, set up a representative banking office in Frankfurt.

Niles’ Weekly Register, Volume 49 had the following to say about the Rothschilds influence on international high finance in 1836;

“The Rothschilds are the wonders of modern banking … we see the descendants of Judah, after a persecution of two thousand years, peering above kings, rising higher than emperors, and holding a whole continent in the hollow of their hands. The Rothschilds govern a Christian world. Not a cabinet moves without their advice. They stretch their hand, with equal ease, from Petersburgh to Vienna, from Vienna to Paris, from Paris to London, from London to Washington. Baron Rothschild, the head of the house, is the true king of Judah, the prince of the captivity, the Messiah so long looked for by this extraordinary people. He holds the keys of peace or war, blessing or cursing. … They are the brokers and counselors of the kings of Europe and of the republican chiefs of America. What more can they desire?”[26]

English branch[edit]

The Rothschild banking family of England was founded in 1798 by Nathan Mayer Rothschild (1777–1836).

French branches[edit]

There are two branches of the family connected to France.

The first was son James Mayer de Rothschild (1792–1868), known as “James”, who established de Rothschild Frères in Paris. Following the Napoleonic Wars, he played a major role in financing the construction of railroads and the mining business that helped make France an industrial power. By 1980, the Paris business employed about 2,000 people and had an annual turnover of 26 billion francs (€4,13 billion or $5 billion in the currency rates of 1980).[27]

But then the Paris business suffered a near death blow in 1982 when the socialist government of François Mitterrand nationalised and renamed it Compagnie Européenne de Banque.[28] Baron David de Rothschild, then 39, decided to stay and rebuild, creating a new entity Rothschild & Cie Banque with just three employees and €830.000 ($1 million) in capital. Today the Paris operation has 22 partners and accounts for a significant part of the global business.

Ensuing generations of the Paris Rothschild family remained involved in the family business, becoming a major force in international investment banking. The Rothschilds have since led the Thomson Financial League Tables in Investment Banking Merger and Acquisition deals in the UK, France, and Italy.

James Mayer de Rothschild‘s other son, Edmond James de Rothschild (1845–1934) was very much engaged in philanthropy and the arts, and was a leading proponent of Zionism. His grandson, Baron Edmond Adolphe de Rothschild, founded in 1953 the LCF Rothschild Group, a private bank. Since 1997, Baron Benjamin de Rothschild chairs the group. The group has €100bn of assets in 2008 and owns many wine properties in France (Château ClarkeChâteau des Laurets), in Australia or in South Africa. In 1961, the 35-year-old Edmond Adolphe de Rothschild purchased the company Club Med, after he had visited a resort and enjoyed his stay.[29][30] His interest in Club Med was sold off by the 1990s. In 1973, he bought out the Bank of California, selling his interests in 1984 before it was sold to Mitsubishi Bank in 1985.

“No kings could afford this! It could only belong to a Rothschild.”

— Wilhelm I, Emperor of Germany, on visiting Château de Ferrières.[31]

The second French branch was founded by Nathaniel de Rothschild (1812–1870). Born in London, he was the fourth child of the founder of the British branch of the family, Nathan Mayer Rothschild (1777–1836). In 1850 Nathaniel Rothschild moved to Paris, ostensibly to work with his uncle James Mayer Rothschild. However, in 1853 Nathaniel acquired Château Brane Mouton, a vineyard in Pauillac in the Gironde département. Nathaniel Rothschild renamed the estate Château Mouton Rothschild, and it would become one of the best known labels in the world. In 1868, Nathaniel’s uncle, James Mayer de Rothschild, acquired the neighboring Chateau Lafite vineyard.

 

 

Austrian branch[edit]

GrüneburgschlößchenFrankfurt, 1845, one of the Rothschilds’ many German garden-mansions. This particular estate was destroyed in an Allied bombing raid, 1944.

In ViennaSalomon Mayer Rothschild established a bank in the 1820s and the Austrian family had vast wealth and position.[32] The crash of 1929 brought problems, and Baron Louis von Rothschild attempted to shore up the Creditanstalt, Austria’s largest bank, to prevent its collapse. Nevertheless, during World War II they had to surrender their bank to the Nazis and flee the country. Their Rothschild palaces, a collection of vast palaces in Vienna built and owned by the family, were confiscated, plundered and destroyed by the Nazis. The palaces were famous for their sheer size and for their huge collections of paintings, armourtapestries and statues (some of which were restored to the Rothschilds by the Austrian government in 1999). All family members escaped the Holocaust, some of them moving to the United States, and returning to Europe only after the war. In 1999, the government of Austria agreed to return to the Rothschild family some 250 art treasures looted by the Nazis and absorbed into state museums after the war.[33]

Naples branch[edit]

Villa Pignatelli, Naples, with views onto Mount Vesuvius

The C M de Rothschild & Figli bank arranged substantial loans to the Papal States and to various Kings of Naples plus the Duchy of Parma and the Grand Duchy of Tuscany. However, in the 1830s, Naples followed Spain with a gradual shift away from conventional bond issues that began to affect the bank’s growth and profitability. The Unification of Italy in 1861, with the ensuing decline of the Italian aristocracy who had been the Rothschild’s primary clients, eventually brought about the closure of their Naples bank, due to declining forecasts for long-term business sustainability. However, in the early 19th century, the Rothschild family of Naples built up close relations with the Vatican Bank, and the association between the family and the Vatican continued into the 20th century. In 1832, when Pope Gregory XVI was seen meeting Carl von Rothschild, observers were shocked that Rothschild was not required to kiss the Pope’s feet, as was then required for all other visitors to the Pope, including monarchs.[34]

“Rothschilds … are the guardians of the papal treasure.”

Encyclopedia Judaica, 1901–1906, Vol. 2, p.497

Jewish identity and positions on Zionism[edit]

Jewish solidarity in the family was not homogeneous. Many Rothschilds were supporters of Zionism, while other members of the family opposed the creation of the Jewish state. Lord Victor Rothschild was against granting asylum or help to Jewish refugees during the Holocaust.[35] In 1917 Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild was the addressee of the Balfour Declaration to the Zionist Federation,[36] which committed the British government to the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.

After the death of James Jacob de Rothschild in 1868, his eldest son Alphonse Rothschild took over the management of the family bank and was the most active in support for Eretz Israel.[37] The Rothschild family archives show that during the 1870s the family contributed nearly 500,000 francs per year on behalf of Eastern Jewry to the Alliance Israélite Universelle.[38] Baron Edmond James de Rothschild, youngest son of James Jacob de Rothschild, was a patron of the first settlement in Palestine at Rishon-LeZion, and bought from Ottoman landlords parts of the land which now makes up present-day Israel. In 1924, he established the Palestine Jewish Colonization Association (PICA), which acquired more than 125,000 acres (50,586 ha) of land and set up business ventures.[39] In Tel Aviv, there is a road, Rothschild Boulevard, named after him as well as various localities throughout Israel which he assisted in founding including MetullaZikhron Ya’akov, Rishon Lezion, and Rosh Pina. A park in Boulogne-Billancourt, Paris, the Parc Edmond de Rothschild (Edmond de Rothschild Park), is also named after its founder.[40] The Rothschilds also played a significant part in the funding of Israel’s governmental infrastructure. James A. de Rothschild financed the Knesset building as a gift to the State of Israel[41] and the Supreme Court of Israel building was donated to Israel by Dorothy de Rothschild.[42] Outside the President’s Chamber is displayed the letter Mrs. Rothschild wrote to the then current Prime Minister Shimon Peres expressing her intention to donate a new building for the Supreme Court.[43]

Interviewed by Haaretz in 2010, Baron Benjamin Rothschild, a Swiss-based member of the banking family, said that he supported the peace process: “I understand that it is a complicated business, mainly because of the fanatics and extremists – and I am talking about both sides. I think you have fanatics in Israel… In general I am not in contact with politicians. I spoke once with Netanyahu. I met once with an Israeli finance minister, but the less I mingle with politicians the better I feel.” On the subject of religious identity, he stated that he held an open-minded attitude: “We do business with all kinds of countries, including Arab countries… My oldest daughter’s boyfriend is a Saudi. He is a great guy and if she will want to marry him, she can.”[44]

Modern businesses, investments, and philanthropy[edit]

The family has fully restoredSpencer HouseSt. James’s Park, London

Since the late-19th century, the family has taken a low-key public profile, donating many famous estates, as well as vast quantities of art, to charity, and generally eschewing conspicuous displays of wealth. Today, Rothschild businesses are on a smaller scale than they were throughout the 19th century, although they encompass a diverse range of fields, including: real estate, banking, asset management, financial advice, wine, and charities.[8][9]

The Rothschild Group[edit]

Since 2003, a group of Rothschild banks have been controlled by Rothschild Continuation Holdings, a Swiss-registered holding company (under the chairmanship of Baron David René de Rothschild). Rothschild Continuation Holdings is in turn controlled by Concordia BV, a Dutch-registered master holding company. Concordia BV is managed by Paris Orléans S.A., a French-registered holding company.[45] Paris Orléans S.A. is ultimately controlled by Rothschild Concordia SAS, a Rothschild’s family holding company.[46] Rothschild & Cie Banque controls Rothschild banking businesses in France and continental Europe, while Rothschilds Continuation Holdings AG controls a number of Rothschild banks elsewhere, including N M Rothschild & Sons in London. Twenty percent of Rothschild Continuation Holdings AG was sold in 2005 to Jardine Strategic, which is a subsidiary of Jardine, Matheson & Co. of Hong Kong. In November 2008, Rabobank Group, the leading investment and private bank in the Netherlands, acquired 7.5% of Rothschild Continuation Holdings AG, and Rabobank and Rothschild entered into a co-operation agreement in the fields of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) advisory and equity capital markets advisory in the food and agribusiness sectors.[47] It was believed that the move was intended to help Rothschild Continuation Holdings AG gain access to a wider capital pool, enlarging its presence in East Asian markets.[48]

Paris Orléans S.A. is a financial holding company listed on Euronext Paris and controlled by the French and English branch of the Rothschild family. Paris Orléans is the flagship of the Rothschild banking Group and controls the Rothschild Group’s banking activities including N M Rothschild & Sons and Rothschild & Cie Banque. It has over 2000 employees. Directors of the company include Eric de Rothschild, Robert de Rothschild, and Count Philippe de Nicolay.[49]

N M Rothschild & Sons, an English investment bank, does most of its business as an advisor for mergers and acquisitions. In 2004, the investment bank withdrew from the gold market, a commodity the Rothschild bankers had traded in for two centuries.[35] In 2006, it ranked second in UK M&A with deals totalling $104.9 billion.[50] In 2006, the bank recorded a pre-tax annual profit of £83.2 million with assets of £5.5 billion.[51]

“Treat the stock exchange like a cold shower (quick in, quick out).”

– A traditional family maxim.[52]

Edmond de Rothschild Group[edit]

The Large Mansion at Gunnersbury Park, London

In 1953, one Swiss member of the family, Edmond Adolphe de Rothschild (1926–1997), founded the LCF Rothschild Group (now Edmond de Rothschild Group), based inGeneva, with €100 billion in assets, which today extends to 15 countries across the world. Although this Group is primarily a financial entity, specialising in asset management and private banking, its activities also cover mixed farming, luxury hotels, and yacht racing. Edmond de Rothschild Group’s committee is currently being chaired by Benjamin de Rothschild, Baron Edmond’s son.

In late 2010, Baron Benjamin Rothschild said that the family had been unaffected by the financial crisis of 2007–2010, due to their conservative business practices: “We came through it well, because our investment managers did not want to put money into crazy things.” He added that the Rothschilds were still a small-scale, traditional family business, and took greater care over their clients’ investments than American companies, adding: “The client knows we will not speculate with his money”.[44][53]

Edmond de Rothschild group includes these companies.

RIT Capital Partners[edit]

In 1980, Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild resigned from N M Rothschild & Sons and took independent control of Rothschild Investment Trust (now RIT Capital Partners, a British investment trust), which has reported assets of $3.4 billion in 2008.[54] It is listed on London Stock Exchange. Lord Rothschild is also one of the major investors behind BullionVault, a gold trading platform.[55]

RIT Capital stores a significant proportion of its assets in the form of physical gold. Other assets include oil and energy-related investments.[56]

Investment[edit]

In 1991, Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild founded J. Rothschild Assurance Group (now St. James’s Place) with Sir Mark Weinberg. It is also listed on London Stock Exchange.[57]

In 2001, the Rothschild mansion located at 18 Kensington Palace Gardens, London, was on sale for £85 million, at that time (2001) the most expensive residential property ever to go on sale in the world. It was built in marble, at 9,000sq ft, with underground parking for 20 cars.[58]

In December 2009, Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild invested $200 million of his own money in a North Sea oil company.[59]

In January 2010, Nathaniel Philip Rothschild bought a substantial share of the Glencore mining and oil company’s market capitalization. He is also buying a large share of the aluminium mining company United Company RUSAL.[60]

During the 19th century, the Rothschilds controlled the Rio Tinto mining corporation, and to this day, Rothschild and Rio Tinto maintain a close business relationship.[61]

In 2012, RIT Capital Partners announced it is to buy a 37 per cent stake in a Rockefeller family wealth advisory and asset management group. The deal, focusing on asset-management, marks the first time that these two well-known families have collaborated.[62] Commenting on the deal, David Rockefeller, a current patriarch of Rockefeller family, said: “The connection between our two families remains very strong.”[63]

Wine[edit]

Château Lafite Rothschild, Bordeaux. Alongside Château Mouton Rothschild, it is perhaps the most prestigious of the many Rothschild wine estates

The Rothschild family has been in the winemaking industry for 150 years.[64] In 1853 Nathaniel de Rothschild purchased Château Brane-Mouton and renamed it Château Mouton Rothschild. In 1868, James Mayer de Rothschild purchased the neighbouring Château Lafite and renamed it Château Lafite Rothschild.

Today, the Rothschild family owns many wine estates: their estates in France include Château Clarke, Château de Malengin, Château Clerc-MilonChâteau d’ArmailhacChâteau Duhart-MilonChâteau Lafite Rothschild, Château de Laversine, Château des LauretsChâteau L’Évangile, Château Malmaison, Château de Montvillargenne, Château Mouton RothschildChâteau de la MuetteChâteau Rieussec and Château Rothschild d’Armainvilliers. They also own wine estates across North America, South America, South Africa and Australia.

Especially, Château Mouton Rothschild and Château Lafite Rothschild are classified as Premier Cru Classé—i.e., First Growth, the status referring to a classification of wines from the Bordeaux region of France.

Art and charity[edit]

The family once had one of the largest private art collections in the world, and a significant proportion of the art in the world’s public museums are Rothschild donations which were sometimes, in the family tradition of discretion, donated anonymously.[65]

Hannah Mary Rothschild was appointed in December 2014 as Chair of the Board of the National Gallery of London.[66]

Cultural references[edit]

The Neo-Gothic Castle de Haar

In the words of the Daily Telegraph: “This multinational banking family is a byword for wealth, power – and discretion… The Rothschild name has become synonymous with money and power to a degree that perhaps no other family has ever matched.”[67]

The Neo-GothicRothschildschloss, Waidhofen

The story of the Rothschild family has been featured in a number of films. The 1934 Hollywood film titled The House of Rothschild, starring George Arlissand Loretta Young, recounted the life of Mayer Amschel Rothschild. Excerpts from this film were incorporated into the Nazi propaganda film Der ewige Jude(The Eternal Jew) without the permission of the copyright holder. Another Nazi film, Die Rothschilds (also called Aktien auf Waterloo), was directed by Erich Waschneck in 1940. A Broadway musical entitled The Rothschilds, covering the history of the family up to 1818, was nominated for a Tony Award in 1971.Nathaniel Mayer (“Natty”) Rothschild, 1st Baron Rothschild appears as a minor character in the historical-mystery novel Stone’s Fall, by Iain Pears. The Rothschild name is mentioned by Aldous Huxley in his novel Brave New World, among many names of historically affluent persons, scientific innovators, and others. The character, named Morgana Rothschild, played a relatively minor role in the story. The name Rothschild used as a synonym for extreme wealth inspired the song “If I Were a Rich Man“, which is based on a song from the Tevye the Dairyman stories, written in the Yiddish as Ven ikh bin Rotshild, meaning “If I were a Rothschild”.[citation needed]

In France, the word “Rothschild” was throughout the 19th and 20th centuries a synonym for seemingly endless wealth, neo-Gothic styles, and epicurean glamour.[68] The family also has lent its name to “le goût Rothschild,” a suffocatingly glamorous style of living whose decorative elements include neo-Renaissance palaces, extravagant use of velvet and gilding, vast collections of armour and sculpture, a sense ofVictorian horror vacui, and the highest masterworks of art. Le goût Rothschild has much influenced designers such as Robert DenningYves Saint LaurentVincent Fourcade, and others.

“Yes, my dear fellow, it all amounts to this: in order to do something first you must be something. We think Dante great, and he had a civilisation of centuries behind him; the House of Rothschild is rich and it has required much more than one generation to attain such wealth. Such things all lie much deeper than one thinks.”

Conspiracy theories[edit]

Over more than two centuries,[18][19] the Rothschild family has frequently been the subject of conspiracy theories.[70][71][72] These theories take differing forms, such as claiming that the family controls the world’s wealth and financial institutions[73][74] or encouraged or discouraged wars between governments. Discussing this and similar views, the historian Niall Ferguson wrote,

As we have seen, however, wars tended to hit the price of existing bonds by increasing the risk that a debtor state would fail to meet its interest payments in the event of defeat and losses of territory. By the middle of the 19th century, the Rothschilds had evolved from traders into fund managers, carefully tending to their own vast portfolio of government bonds. Now having made their money, they stood to lose more than they gained from conflict. The Rothschilds had decided the outcome of the Napoleonic Wars by putting their financial weight behind Britain. Now they would sit on the sidelines.[75]

Many conspiracy theories about the Rothschild family have been identified as a result of anti-Semitic prejudice reaching back several hundred years, including the era of the Napoleonic wars, and not as a result of valid evidence.[76][77][78][79][80]

Prominent descendants of Mayer Amschel Rothschild[edit]

Prominent lineal descendants of Mayer Amschel Rothschild include among many others:

  • Emil.F de Rothchild

Baron David René de Rothschild, current French chairman of N M Rothschild & Sons and formerly of De Beers

A Rothschild Villa, in KönigsteinGermany, photographed in 1900

Lord Ferdinand von Rothschild (1839–1898)

Sybil Cholmondeley, Marchioness of Cholmondeley (1894–1989), painted by John Singer Sargent

Halton House, a Rothschild family mansion in Buckinghamshire, England

Lionel de Rothschild, whose colt Sir Bevys won the 1879 Epsom Derby

Vermeer’s The Astronomer, donated to charity by the family in 1982.

Ascott House, donated to charity by the family in 1947.

Exbury House, a Rothschild estate in England.

Prominent marriages into the family include, among many others:

Coat of arms[edit]

Arms of Rothschild family
Great coat of arms of Rothschild family.svg
Notes
Coat of arms of the Rothschild family
Adopted
1822 (awarded by Emperor Francis I of Austria)
Crest
Crests: 1st, out of a ducal coronet Or a mullet of six points Or between two horns per fess alternately Or and Sable, Sable and Or; 2nd, issuant from a ducal coronet Or an eagle displayed Sable; 3rd, out of a ducal coronet Or three ostrich feathers, the centre one Argent and the exterior ones Azure [96]
Escutcheon
Quarterly: 1st, Or an eagle displayed Sable langued Gules; 2nd, Azure issuing from the sinister flank an arm embowed proper grasping five arrows points downward Argent; 3rd, Azure issuing from the dexter flank an arm embowed proper grasping five arrows points downward Argent; 4th, Or a Lion rampant Gules; over all an escutcheon Gules charged with an oval target with pointed center Argent per bend sinister [96]
Supporters
Dexter: a lion rampant OrSinister: a unicorn Argent
Motto
Concordia, Integritas, Industria (Latin for “Unity, Integrity, Diligence”)

 

TO VOTE OR NOT TO VOTE.

I always remember when I was young being told how important voting is and how I am privileged and honoured we are to have the right to vote. People died fighting for our right to vote is drilled in to our heads by the school system and the media. It’s true! people did die for our right to vote and for our “freedom” or at least they thought they did.

After spending months tracing my family tree I found numerous family members that died in both wars, I also found out my great grandfather was wounded in world war one, an injury that crippled his arm, so I do understand how hard they fought for us and how lucky we are that we have not had to fight a war like it and how we owe them our respect, gratitude and our freedom.

Since than things have changed and again our freedom is under attack, we have the right to vote but not the right to change things. Political parties in Britain and many parts of the world are moving to the right wing, UKIP and Conservatives are far right and Labour are not far behind them. Nick Clegg as succeeded in destroying the Lib Dems as Tony Blair did Labour. An election in Britain now consists of four parties that are almost identical, why?

Governments and political parties need money to operate, money and more money. Normal people (even well off people) can not afford to pay a MP to act for us or to speak for us, only big businesses have that kind of money, which means governments/political parties need big businesses to fund them so big businesses end up controlling all the political parties with money. The political parties that do not except donations from big businesses or rich individuals end up with nowhere near enough money to even have their opinions heard. Because of this normal people become unrepresented by main stream politicians and even if we did our research and take the time to find an obscure political party in Britain that we do feel represents us and vote for them, nobody else will, 80% will vote for one the big four simply because they seen them on television.

People are busy working or raising a family, they leave politics to the politicians, the politicians make them work harder, the media distract them and “inform” them of the “news” and present the political parties to them, them people will vote one of the big four.

As if donations from businesses/rich individuals and propaganda does not make a big enough farce out of the voting system, there is another huge problem.

When running up to the last election David Cameron did not tell people he was going to attempt to privatize the NHS, political parties make promises they know they can not keep to win votes and then face no consequence when pre election promises/targets are not meet.

These are some of the reasons I have never and probably will never vote.

 

First Published 14/12/14.

 

Since writing this I have changed my mind and I am considering voting for the Green Party, simply because the Green Party are the only party that seem to be offering change.

SOME MORE OBSERVATIONS BY WOLVOMAN80.

Mark Zuckerberg

Money definitely can not buy good looks! The owner of Facebook Mark Zuckerberg is so ugly you kind of expect to see a bit of dribble on his cheek or a few baked beans on his face, I bet his shirt is covered with his last meal.

ALL POLICE IN BRITAIN NEED TASERS TO PROTECT THEM FROM YOU LUNATICS.

GENERAL ELECTION 2015 COMING SOON. Which Israeli supporting, corporate puppet Zionist are you going to vote for?

GENERAL ELECTION 2015 COMING SOON. David Cameron should be aware that it will take more then low petrol prices and a slight improvement in the economy to make people forget that he is a corrupt, untrustworthy, war mongering, snobbish, greedy, lying, PONCE.

Our idiotic, delusional world leaders walk through France holding hands to show unity against terrorism yet about 20000 children die everyday through hunger related illnesses, due to the greed and ignorance of our world leaders and their bosses (BANKERS, CORPS ANYONE WITH RIDICULOUS AMOUNTS OF MONEY)

Ed Miliband and the Labour party have promised not to spend the election build up bashing Tory policies, I would advise against this, because NOBODY in Britain who votes for Ed Miliband will vote for him because they like Ed Miliband, they will vote for him because they hate David Cameron.

SOME OBSERVATIONS BY WOLVOMAN80.

THE QUEENS SPEECH


Reading the public’s reaction in the comments section of the Queen’s speech is BRILLIANT, we all know Lizzie is a Lizard and the mainstream media can not cover up the fact that Lizzie the Lizard is about as popular with the average Brit as Ebola is.

PLAYSTATION NETWORK DOWN AGAIN


To all the people that have waited for weeks ready for their new PS4 only to discover that the PlayStation is down, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Carry on waiting! And thank God that your life is comfortable enough for this issue to matter so much because some people have real problems.



FROZEN.


After hearing months of hype about the movie Frozen and hearing how “adults love it as well as children” I finally watched some of it today and to be honest I thought it was a load of over rated, over hyped shit, surely the only adults watching this shit are mentally impaired adults. A talking snow man, lame songs and music, no real story or plot and just sometimes absolute meaningless randomness, grow the fuck up and realize the only thing good about Frozen is the marketing, you simple minded idiots.



SANTA IS A RACIST FAT DRUNK.


If Santa tried losing some weight and staying sober maybe children all over the world would “know it is Christmas” instead of Santa dropping off thousands of pounds of shit to some kids and nothing to more needing kids houses. To me Santa seems like a racist, half soaked drunk, does Santa think that, all rich white children are good or something? Or is he not doing his job properly. In fact, fuck all this talking and no action I am going to capture him and kill him! Sorry folks.



MARK ZUCKERBERG


Lets all use Facebook to tell ZUCKERBERG OUR OPINION OF HIM. Lets turn Facebook into Zuckerbergs MONSTER and allow his monster to eat him and rid the world of him and his corruption, greed and lack of respect for our rights and FREEDOM.



I AM V! NO YOU ARE NOT, YOU ARE A TWAT.


Can people please stop wearing these STUPID V for Vendetta masks, you can’t be calling people sheep and criticizing corporate misbehavior while dressed in a costume made by a corporation, promoting a corporate made movie, dressed the same as everyone else!

PAT CONDELL


I bet Pat Condell’s racist, hatred videos do not get censored from YouTube, he calls Sweden antisemitic because they recognize Palestine, at the same time he constantly attacks Islam. Watching him on my screen makes me want to punch my monitor, right in his old, arrogant face.



BE SCARED.


Do we need another war? The government want us to be scared of Islam, terrorists, extremists, conspiracy theories and bloggers but the only thing that seems dangerous to me is OUR GOVERNMENT.



DANGEROUS IDEOLOGIES.


David Cameron claims world ideologies by non violent extremists can lead to violence!!!!! Yet British government ideologies lead to the deaths and enslavement of millions of people all over the world. And they ain’t finished yet.



BRAVE DAVE WILL SLAY THE BEAST.


David Cameron claims he is going to “hunt down the monsters” responsible for the recent beheading. What he means is that he is going to spend OUR taxes and send OUR troops and watch what follows on the TV in his nice comfortable mansion.



BRITAIN MOVING TOWARDS AN ISLAMIC STATE?

People in Great Britain are always attacking Islam with stupid comments like “they are taking over the country!” To this I say “what are they taking over? Our government? Our media? Our entertainment industry? Our businesses? You must be getting Islam confused with Zionism.

 

CENSORSHIP OFFENDS ME.

 

I get offended by this censorship of my opinions, what part of my beliefs make the government believe I am an extremist that should be censored? Is it my anti war, anti greed, anti poverty views or my anti child labour posts or maybe my dangerous view that we should live and let live and there are two sides to every story?

 
 

WOLVOMAN80=LUNATIC.

 

Facebook or the government or somebody that thinks they are important has decided that this Facebook page is run by a lunatic and it is not safe for you to listen to the rants of this lunatic! That’s why Facebook have taken the liberty of hiding the posts from this page. Now go back to reading how Muslims and benefit scroungers are taking all of our money.

 
 

WOLVOMAN80=BENEFIT SCROUNGER.

 

I am sometimes accused of being lazy and a benefits scrounger due to me not having a job for 3 years!

My answer to these people is, if I am lazy, how do I get people watching my videos from all over the world? From the Antarctic to Africa, Japan and India. In my laziness I have still managed to have a bigger impact on the world then most hard working, law abiding, conformist citizens, so fuck you and your lame paid jobs!

 
 

ICE BUCKET CHALLENGE.

 

Instead of throwing buckets of ice water over yourselves why don’t we throw Hydrofluoric acid instead?

There are children in the world that do not even have access to clean water, what must they think of us when they see lame brained, do gooders doing shit like this? Especially when some of the people doing this lame brained, attention seeking publicity stunt have millions or even billions in the bank.

 
 

THANK YOU FREEMANTLE.

 

Freemantle (the makers of Xfactor and lots of other shit) have released ownership of my video meaning my YouTube channel is fully working again. 

WOLVOMAN80 would like to thank Freemantle for removing their disgusting, talent-less, greedy, slimy reptilian, lying, corporate hands off my videos and my YouTube channel. Thanks.

 

WHY DO COUNCIL HOUSES COME WITH PREPAYMENT METERS?

Because of the fact Google are refusing me a payment to me, despite videos made by me receiving OVER 15 MILLION VIEWS and my channel gaining 20000 subscribers, I am Council housed, in a poor area and a house that is way too small for for my children. If Google paid me the $80000 USD they owed me I would be buying or at least private renting in an area far away from my current address.

Living in a council house or housing association house is not too bad, the house the easy to warm and comfortable and as long as I pay my rent and don’t turn the place in to a drug den I am housed.

One complaint about council houses is why do they always come with PREPAYMENT METERS? Prepayment meters for Gas and Electric, prepayment meters are ridiculously expensive compared to standard bills, they result in the lower classes, the poor, the disabled and anyone that lives in a council house paying A LOT more money for the same product.

My house has a prepayment meter for both Gas and Electric, meaning that some “business” is making a absolute fortune from my families need to stay warm!

On average my family of six costs £5 per day in electric alone, if we use the tumble dryer or a boil wash the money drops quicker than Nick Clegg’s popularity has dropped, you would I am trying to power a mansion and a family of 20 if you were to watch the meter.

These Prepayment meters are being used by energy businesses as another way to rip off the poor, why should poor people pay so much more for the same product? The answer is they shouldn’t. Prepayment meters should either be scrapped completely or properly regulated and capped.

Advantages of prepayment meters include:

:

  • helping customers to manage their debt and energy usage;
  • preventing large, unexpected bills,

Disadvantages of prepayment meters include:

  • above average costs for your gas and electricity;
  • the best energy deals on the market aren’t available to prepayment meter customers;
  • they can be inconvenient because you have to go out to ‘top up’ keys and smartcards;
  • if you can’t reach a shop to top up your meter your energy can be switched off;
  • older meters need to have their prices updated manually after price rises or falls, which can take months. This means you could be left paying old rates and owing a lump sum or paying too much.

ANOTHER PREPAYMENT METER RANT.

Five years ago I lived in a private rented bungalow in Wolverhampton. This Bungalow had an electric meter, this meter would cut off whenever the money on it went to 0.00 but it would allow “emergency credit” of £5.00. You would think that would mean that you can not get in to then £5.00 debt with them, well that’s what I thought anyway, I was WRONG.

NPOWER are insisting that I owe them £250 in unpaid electric at that address! Not only are they insisting I owe them £250 they have gone to the trouble of passing the debt on to a bailiff company, this bailiff company harass constantly with letters and threats. I explain to NPOWER that the place they are billing me for had a prepayment meter with money on in when I left but still the letters and threats of repossession come.

It seems to me like everything in Britain is a rip off as I am having a similar problem with Severn Trent Water but Severn Trent have been clever about it and contacted the Job center, Severn Trent now take the money directly from my benefits!

 

First Published 19/10/2014

A RADICAL, CRAZY, EXTREME AND DANGEROUS NEW WAY OF THINKING?

David Cameron and his sleazy Conservative government along with the mainstream media try to present political activists, conspiracy theorists or anyone that disagrees with them as dangerous, he even claims that they could inspire terrorists to attack and that would make the “conspiracy theorist” a terrorist! Is that true? I suppose a mentally unstable person watching a video that is criticizing the government could make him do something stupid. and regrettable. So what we going to do? Stop all criticism of our government to make sure we don’t effect the thoughts of the psychopathic population?

What about a mentally unstable person playing Grand Theft Auto? or watching Breaking Bad, American Horror Story or near enough everything that is on T.V? Listening to gangster rap, Black Metal or the most disturbing out of them all Justin Bieber.

 

It is a little bit of a ridiculous argument “we are censoring the internet of materiel that exposes our greed, corruption and evilness in case it causes some angry, psychopathic lunatic to hurt people. Why can’t they just tell the truth “the information is embarrassing and undermining our authority, it makes us appear to be weak, lame, pathetic, greedy and uncaring, because we are.”

They call it extreme but is it really extreme to say instead of taking money from the poor and middle classes and handing it to the rich, lets take money the the upper classes, the elite and the billionaire corporations and look after the poor, the weak and the sick? Is it extreme to ask why our government think it is O.K to murder for oil? Or is it extreme to think murder for oil and slavery for profit are O.K and necessary?

The reason that our government call our views extreme and dangerous is because to the government, the establishment and the corporations our views are dangerous! These “crazy theories and extremist political ideologies” could lead to the establishment losing money, land and respect. These theories and political ideologies are a serous threat to the rich and the greedy, the political elite and billionaire corporations, they are not a serous threat to people that have nothing because people that have nothing have nothing lose.

Today people that want peace are considered to be extremists, fanatics and dangerous where as people that want war are considered intelligent, logical and patriotic.

THERE IS SHIT ALL OVER THE RADIO!

shitradio

Recently the CD player in my car broke forcing me to listen to the radio “its Okay” I thought I will soon find a decent radio channel that I do not mind listening to, Six months later and I still have not found one! When listening to the radio we spend more time listening to corny advertisements telling us what to buy and corny DJ’s telling us how and what to think then we spend listening to music. I do not fully understand radio broadcasting laws in the UK nor do I understand PPL licenses but from what I can see and work out about these laws, it seems to be illegal for radio channels to play decent music!

It also seems to be illegal for radio DJ’s not to be corny, irritating idiots. These radio laws and regulations that Ofcom claim are important because “The use of radio continues to expand rapidly. This applies to business, broadcasting and leisure activities. The use of radio is carefully planned to give as high a standard of service as possible. Unauthorized use of radio can cause harmful interference to legitimate users. Safety of life may be put at risk if, for example, the radios used by emergency services suffer interference. The successful running of a business can be affected by radio interference. Listeners can be prevented from enjoying their favourite radio station by interference. This is why Ofcom takes action to prevent interference and why the penalties that may be imposed by the courts for unlawful use of radio can be heavy” are actually destroying quality and choice of the radio. And when Ofcom say “legitimate users” what they actually mean is people that pay, as always everything comes down to money.

Because of the corporations that own the radio channels, the record labels and the TV channels and their greed and obsessive willingness to control the thoughts of the masses by using the huge monopoly they have of mainstream media to spread their messages and to promote low quality pop music, radio plays it over and over and the public rush out and buy it. YouTube began to open the door for new interesting and original music, until greedy corporations recognized the potential in YouTube and on the internet, Google now give huge advantages to corporate music, advantages like priority on Google and Youtube search engines, Google spread new corporate music on the related video section of YouTube videos that are almost completely unrelated. These shit music videos also end up as featured videos on home pages and sometimes links even show up on ads before watching the video that you actually wanted to watch.

Like all mainstream media Radio in the UK is weak, it is unimaginative, full of propaganda and it seriously lacks choice, if you like listening to mind numbing, pop music, DJs talking to people like we are stupid, and adverts that are so lame and full of shit jingles so we walk around either singing business phone numbers or business names then radio is the place to be, if not buy a CD player.

IF GOD IS REAL WHY DO THE INNOCENT SUFFER?

I used to be an atheist, I went to a Catholic school and was bought up with “Christian beliefs” and therefore as a child I believed in God and although I knew very little of him I also believed in Jesus Christ, I also believed in the Easter Bunny and Father Christmas. As the years go by we grow up, we find out Santa and almost everything we once believed is a lie, it seems only natural that God, Jesus, the devil is also a lie, they are illogical and if they are illogical they must be false.

As a young man I did not believe in silly stories like the stories told in the bible, to me religion was boarder lining insanity and Christians were strict, obsessed, misguided idiots, the same way as T.V portrays them to be. To me the belief in Heaven and God were desperate attempts for people to make themselves feel better. I believed that religion was a tool used purely to control people, if God is real why does he allow such cruelty and suffering? Why not intervene, help people or give us a sign, I believe in science, life and the news, religion is total nonsense and I believed this for many years.

Then I got the internet! As a child I was honestly not interested in learning at all, computer games and playing football were way more interesting than school, school bored the shit out of me, I found it tedious and repetitive, I did not care for learning until I left school, having left school I became interested in politics, the news, political satire, science and I began to love to learn, either watching documentaries researching material for making videos or reading. As all young people do, I assumed I knew the world, it taken me a while to learn and except that I knew nothing, the internet opened me up to brand new information, information that I first believed was ridiculous, paranoid and funny. However the more I read the more convinced I was that there was actually more truth on the internet written by so called “conspiracy theorists” then all the mainstream media combined times one billion.

When we look at the state of the planet, people living in poverty and pain, it is hard to believe in God, but looking at the state of the planet and recognizing some of the evil that takes place on this planet made me consider the possibility of “the devil” and if the devil is real God is real.

When we look at this planet and see the poverty, pain and suffering and say “this proves that God is not real” maybe it doesn’t, maybe it proves that the devil is real! “Why would God allow this suffering” atheists scream, but God does not allow this suffering people do. There is more than enough of everything including food to go around, greed, waste and a lack of interest bought on by lack of financial potential in supplying the world with food causes poverty and poverty causes disease. As the great Tony Benn once said “if we have the money to kill people, we have the money to help people” or something like that. As I got older I began to understand that I don’t know anything, this planet has existed for over 5 billion years I have been on it for 34 years, for me to assume “I know God is not real or Jesus is not savoir” based on what I am told would be stupid and the more I look at society the more convinced I am that we need saving and we need forgiveness. We had better hope and prey that Jesus stays true to his word and we are saved because if not, then what? Who will save us? Russell Brand? Mark Dice? Alex Jones?  Hahahahaha, you might as well wait for Batman.

you-need-jesus-christian-picture-quote

Internet censorship will █████████ █ ██████ ███

There █████ █ ████ is ███ █ no █████ █ ████ conspiracy █ █████████ █ ████ everything ███ █████ is█████ ████ ████ fine ████ ███ ██████ trust ███ ██████ ███ your █████ ████ government.

 Facebook █████ ███ █ is █████████ █ ██████ ███ a brilliant ████ ███ ██████ ███ website █████ ████ and  ████ ███ ██████ facebook █████ ████ believes in █████ █ ████ ███ freedom of speech. ███ facebook!

Follow me on my censored Facebook page

Or subscribe to my CENSORED Youtube channel

FACEBOOK MUST MAKE MONEY ON EVERYTHING.

a116

Recently Facebook have taken over WhatsApp costing them an unbelievable and ridiculous 19 billion dollars. That kind of money could contribute massively towards sorting out some of the worlds problems, problems like poverty, oppression, starvation and supplying the world with water. Instead of this Facebook decide to spend it on eliminating competition, actions and greed like this is just one more example of why corporations like Facebook, Google and Amazon should pay a lot more tax than they do. In my opinion a corporation like Facebook should be taxed at least 80% on their ridiculously massive profit, this would prevent these greedy, bloodsucking, inbred parasites from having an absolute monopoly on the internet and simply taking over their competition.

Google have ruined YouTube and Google plus forces YouTube users/uploaders to have a useless/shit Google plus account. I do not like Facebook or Google and I would much rather not have to use these disgusting, greedy companies but unfortunately they have such of a huge monopoly on the internet that we have no choice. If I were to close my YouTube and Facebook accounts in protest of their lack of respect for our rights, freedom of speech and their disgusting greed, it would make it impossible for my videos to be watched for free or at least mean that I would lose 95% of my audience.

But Facebook, Youtube, Google are now all censoring the web and with the huge monopoly these and a few other corporations now have on the internet they could potentially remove all criticism of themselves from their websites this would completely destroy civil liberties and the masses do not even notice, it is not as if the mainstream media (owned by the same corporations that are ruining the internet) are going to expose themselves instead they will carry on rambling about celebrities private lives. Internet censorship is now happening everyday and they are slowly winning the battle it will not be long before the internet is under control unless we begin to create and use new alternative websites.

Something else that I have noticed is the fact that if I share my download links or a link that sends people to a website that requires payment for example Amazon or Sellfy my post will struggle to reach forty or fifty people! They do this to encourage Facebook users to pay Facebook to spread information that they should not have to pay for but in usual Facebook fashion Facebook decide that people that do not have the money to pay to be heard, should not be heard.

 

CONCENTRATE ON YOUR OWN MISERABLE EXISTENCE.

Why do so many people spend so much time attacking what other people are doing? Our media spend most of their time and efforts attacking what we do, what we wear and what we think. Recently our government and the government mouthpiece we call our media have began a full attack on the Burqa, they want to ban the Burqa! Why? An what right do the government and media have telling us how to dress? Our government are control freaks and the best way to free yourself of a parasitic control freak and do the exact opposite to what they want meaning we should all start wearing Burqa’s!

Some people claim that Britain is a free country, despite our prisons being full of minor drug offenders, cannabis growers and smokers,  people that failed to pay taxes and many other small crimes and offences. Since when does a free country tell people what they can and cannot wear? Since when does a free country force people to work just to receive the tiny amount of benefit that they need to survive.

If you do not like Burqa’s don’t wear a Burqa, if you do not like cannabis don’t smoke it, if you think that life on benefits is easy quit your job and live your life on benefits! When are people going to stop obsessing with what others are doing and concentrate on their own miserable lives, because lets be honest that is the root of the problem, you don’t hate Burqa’s, weed smokers, Muslims, Black people or benefit scroungers, you hate your miserable lives, your dead end jobs and the endless bills. You hate whoever the media point at for you to blame for the mess that is your life and the media point at everyone other than themselves, governments, corrupt tax evading child labour using corporations and bankers and you fall for there lies, so the only person that you can blame and hate is yourself!

People spend to much time obsessing like jealous school girls with what other people are doing or what they are getting and almost no time at all worrying about what people are not getting and that is one of the main reasons that we are in this mess, we bicker and argue with each other and the real enemy watches us destroy each other while they use the media to direct and control us.

HOW TO CONTACT GOOGLE.

Recently my estimated YouTube estimated earnings were showing nearly $13000, not much for 3 years work and over 14 million views, most of which have had ads on the side bars at the bottom of the picture and adverts ranging from 10 seconds to over one minute in front of the video, adverts Google will be paid for, $13000 is not great but it is a start, its something to show for the hours that I have sat at this computer researching and putting information together.

Two days later I log in to my YouTube account to access the money I have earned, its gone, my estimated earnings now show 0.64 cents! I attempt to contact Google, I find a YouTube contact email, service@youtube.com and send my questions.

The next I day receive an email, message failed I send it again and try to find other ways of contacting YouTube or Google, after literally hours of looking through YouTube troubleshooting pages, answering questionnaires, searching the internet and even a desperate phone call to Google Adwords I get no where.

I have come to the conclusion that it is impossible to contact Google over the internet, I believe that it would be easier to contact the dead then what it is Google. Why is it so hard to contact Google or YouTube? The only way left for me to try is a letter to their head office, Google own Gmail, YouTube, control a massive proportion of the internet and are supposed to be leader in the technological world, yet the only way to contact them is a letter, what do they think it is the 1800s? Its just an easy way for Google and YouTube to completely ignore peoples complaints and problems.

Complaints like YouTube paying sick, greedy corporations for views and adverts used on my videos, Sony, BBC, News Corporation and Hearst Corporation have all profited and sometimes even taken down videos that I have made, I am aware that these companies are due some payment, for some clips I have used but surely not all of it, apparently I am allowed none of it, I have 4 kids and I am currently unemployed and on benefits, I am owed money from billionaire corporations, but that will not stop the Department of Work and pensions (who’s offices attacked my website earlier on in the year, leading to my website having to be taken down)  from pressuring me from taken a shit job at a warehouse for no more money then my benefits.

One month later my earnings are now showing $3.22.

First Published 17/07/2013.

The GREED OF Larry Page and Sergey Brin.

Larry Page and Sergey Brin are the founders and 16% owners of internet giant Google. As of 2013, Page’s personal wealth is estimated to be US $20.3 billion, ranking him 13th on the Forbes 400, a list of the 400 richest Americans. In 2013 Sergey Mikhaylovich Brin’s personal wealth was estimated to be $22.8 billion by Forbes making him the 21st richest man on the planet.

But like most billionaires the more money they get the greedier they become, in 2012 Google invested $18.2 billion dollars in to lobbying making them the 8th biggest government investors in the USA, money well spent because due to the super rich and huge multi national corporations like Google lobbying there are now so many loop holes in the tax system its easy for these billionaire corporations like Google, Amazon and Starbucks to avoid paying the huge tax bills that the middle and working classes are imprisoned for not paying.

The working classes pay as little as 20% and as much as 50% the super rich pay as little as 0% and as much as 5%, its a effective way to keep themselves rich and the rest of us poor, Google tax evasion has cost the American tax payer $3.1 billion dollars over a three year span, why else would the lobbyists lobby?

Google finances is not the only source of power Google have, Google also have control of information, they have information on its users even more disturbingly they have the power to chose what we read on Google news and even what we watch on Youtube, Google may not yet censor but even without full blown censorship they have the power to hide and slow the spread information, if Google do not like something like criticism of themselves for scandals like tax evasion and lobbying they can easily hide it and prevent millions from reading it. Google is a very dangerous and greedy company and the greed of Google is destroying the internet, they have already destroyed YouTube with ads and censor now they are destroying the whole internet and freedom of speech at the same time.

 

A MESSAGE TO FACEBOOK AND MARK ZUCKERBERG.

MarkZuckerbergReptilianEdit

Once again I find myself writing about Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook, I do not like this subject, I find it boring and I hate wasting my time talking about it, but once again Facebook are irritating me! WOLVOMAN80 is now a business meaning I have to attempt to make a living from blogs and videos, I have had millions of views, I also have thousands of people that follow me on social media like Facebook, yet when I post on Facebook my post reaches about 30 people! Also Facebook have not counted a new like for months, I see new likes when I click the new likes box but the number of new likes counted by Facebook goes down. Why? It is either because Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg do not like people exercising their right to freedom of speech or Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg have been paid to hide certain political pages by somebody that does not like people exercising their right to freedom of speech.

Like I say I find the subject of a little, geeky, weakling that steals ideas and then destroys them and never changes his clothes boring! I have no interest what so ever in Mark Zuckerberg but when his greed affects me and people like me, I do feel the need to tell people that Zuckerberg is a DICK! I wish that I did not have to use his website but unfortunately if I didn’t, you probably would not be reading this now. I respect that Mark Zuckerberg, the British government and the super rich do not agree with my political views, I would not expect them to, but instead hiding peoples ideas and opinions why don’t they try promoting their own ideas and opinions. Why does Mark Zuckerberg not begin a Facebook page for people that think the way he does, why don’t Mark Zuckerberg begin a page showing his support for Israel and Zionism? He could share pictures among other Zionists of their victims and use Facebook to promote the wars that Zuckerberg obviously supports, if he does not support them why does he censor Facebook of criticism of them?

I can honestly say I would not write a single word about this dork if he did not affect what I do, but unfortunately the greed of Zuckerberg and his lack of respect for our rights seriously disturbs me, he reminds me of DR EVIL’S son in Austin Powers, he was a twisted little dork as well. My message to Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg is simple, if my reach falls below a certain level and I feel that Facebook is not following Freedom of speech laws correctly, I can simply use Facebook and my blogs to talk about the fact that Zuckerberg pays media to portray him positively and removes negative articles on his website or the fact that Zuckerberg looks like a ill, smelly breathed, inbreed. Or even the fact that Facebook is used as a world wide spy machine thanks to Zuckerberg. But like I say I would rather talk about more interesting and important subjects without censorship please.

ONLY GOD CAN JUDGE US.

human-judge

 

What qualification’s does some one need to become a judge? They must understand the law and the British legal and justice system, which I am pretty sure nobody in the world does understand, and that’s it! Judging by some of the sentences given by British courts, judges do not need to be compassionate, understanding people. They feel no way in locking people up not thinking about their families, these highly paid judges must think they are something special. High Court judges take home a salary of about £172,000 with a generous pension too, how can these judges, judge people that in most cases have nothing, throw them in prison, rip apart families when these highly paid, comfortable living judges have no idea about life for people that live in these oppressed areas.

We claim alcohol addiction is an illness and we treat them, same with any addiction food, chocolate and even gambling yet when drug addicts are caught with drugs we lock them up, and not just for a few months but for years!

I have seen cases in what someone has been sentenced for a soft two years for a stabbing yet I have seen drug addicts sentenced for over 4 years for possession, where is the sense and fairness in that? These judges should also consider that in many cases these people are from poor backgrounds and they sometimes have children, locking them up does not help anybody, these people would not commit these crimes if they were on a quarter of a yearly judges wage, surely that fact alone makes judges unfit and unable to judge.

It seems to me our governments so called “war on drugs” is just another excuse to harass people, that most of the time do not deserve the harassment.

These judges lock people up and break up families yet they never address the real problem, our government claim that not enough dads are there for their children, well they can’t be there for children if they are in prison.

Why do these judges never address issues like poverty, desperation and other issues, for example if the government stop a mans benefits they are surely pushing that man towards crime, its illegal to work for cash in hand with out declaring what you have earned, so no matter what he does he will be breaking the law, unless he is fortunate enough to find a real job that would just about break even with his benefits.

I am not anti prison, rapists, murders and anyone that goes out to hurt some one should be punished, but possession of drugs? David Cameron, Boris Johnson and George Osborne have all used Cocaine.

Only God can judge us.

I MAKE THE VIDEOS YOUTUBE MAKE THE MONEY!

I am now a part of the YouTube team, an online friend told me once your account gets over 15000 subs we are given a special method of contact to our team leaders, YouTube. They gives loads to read about how valued we are and they call you a partner!

I decide to contact my new team leaders and ask them about payment, after all social blade estimates they owe me up to £60000 and last year YouTube own stats showed they owed me $13000 before clearing and going back down to 0.00! I have already sent two written letters to YouTube’s head office only to be ignored, twice, they must mean silent partner, I stay silent and I am a valued partner. CLICK HERE TO SEE SOCIAL BLADE STATS 

I am keeping record of all my conversations with these people at YouTube, so far they have explained nothing and ignored a request from me (acting on the advice of a solicitor) for records of how much money YouTube/GOOGLE have made from my videos.

So far my new partners seem to think that I should make the videos and they and their friends should make the money!

I don’t want to be a part of you’re shitty, censoring, lying, greedy “youtube family” and I don’t give a flying fuck if you hate me, my videos or anything else, I just want the money that I am owed and my legal right to freedom of speech and freedom of expression.

So far my partners have answered shortly, unhelpfully and they are now just ignoring my emails. I am going to send my partners a link to this blog and inform them that everything that the email conversation between me and my new partners will be documented on my next blog.

After a online friend informed me that partners with over 15000 subs can contact YouTube, I decided to contact them regarding the non payment of advertising revenue on my most popular videos. The conversation went like this.

WOLVOMAN80 SENT;  An issue of non payment effects nearly every video I have. Google  are not allowing me to collect any payment on my most popular videos, I  understand that SOME of these videos do contain music that is copyright  protected therefore I understand that Google might collect royalties for  third parties, but I am still entitled to some payment at the moment Google  are paying me at the rate of 0.0000053 cents per view despite ads. Social  Blade estimates my top 30 vids have earned £60000. Need payment plz.

YOUTUBE SEND AUTOMATED MESSAGE; Thanks for contacting YouTube! We’ve received your support request, and a member of our team will respond to you shortly. In the meantime, for additional YouTube Support options, please visithttps://support.google.com/youtube/answer/3545535?hl=en.

Sincerely,

The YouTube Support Team.

YOUTUBE REPLY; 

Hello Michael,

Advertising revenue is based on a number of factors and may not be directly correlated to video views. These factors include advertiser bidding, advertising availability and advertiser demand for your videos.

As YouTube continues to welcome more monetized videos into the mix, we want to be as transparent as possible and help you understand that there will be fluctuation in the revenue earned by those videos.

* Advertising is both seasonal and flighted. This means, for example, that the Holiday season (November and December) are times of the year when there is tremendous investment in advertising and January and February tend to be lighter months. We’ve also noticed that when times are lean, businesses often cut their marketing budgets, and fewer ads are available.

* There are different ad formats that will run on your *watch pages* (we call any page that a video is watched on, a *watch page*) and each of those ad formats carries a different CPM (cost per thousand impressions.) For example, when you see the overlay running on the actual video, that is called the YouTube InVideo ad and advertisers pay a nice hefty CPM for that unit. When there is not an InVideo ad sold, then you will only see the square ad to the right of the video. We call that a 300×250 (the dimensions of the ad) and when you see that, and no InVideo – you can assume that the CPM is much lower.

* Your net revenue is dependent on several things, including which ad format appears, what the advertiser paid, and the amount of times your video was viewed. In addition, the geographic location of your viewers/audience will impact your net revenue. We’re steadily expanding the InVideo ad format internationally, and this format generates the most revenue for you.

It will be a little tricky in the beginning to gauge what your payment will be each month. You have to keep in mind that on the other side there has to be an advertiser with interest in advertising on your content and it’ll take a little time to build the interest. If you are curious about how we present the opportunities, you can check out www.youtube.com/advertise to see how the Google sales team approaches selling.

Keep creating the content and we’ll keep at it from our side.

Sincerely,

Prince

The YouTube Team

WOLVOMAN80 SENT; That does not even come close to helping me.

WOLVOMAN80 SENT; YouTube owe me over £60000 (according to social blade) why are YouTube not allowing me to advertise on videos that I have made? Even worse, they ARE allowing other businesses to advertise and not paying me a penny! HELP.

YOUTUBE REPLY; Please only refer to your YouTube Analytics for estimated earnings report. For more information about this, please visit: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/1714384?hl=en&ref_topic=3029002

WOLVOMAN80 SENDS; Last year just before Christmas my stats on YouTube showed that you owed me $13000 only to go down to zero a couple of days later!

I DECIDE TO TRY BEGINNING THE WHOLE PROCEDURE AGAIN, AND START A NEW COMPLAINT, IS SEND;   Last year (2013) just before Christmas my stats on YouTube showed that YouTube owed me $13000 only to go down to zero a couple of days later! Nearly 16 million views with ads! How much have YouTube/Google made from my videos?

YOUTUBE SEND AUTOMATED MESSAGE; Thanks for contacting YouTube! We’ve received your support request, and a member of our team will respond to you shortly. In the meantime, for additional YouTube Support options, please visithttps://support.google.com/youtube/answer/3545535?hl=en.

YOUTUBE REPLY; Hello Mike,

Your original query has been dealt with by the Partner Support team. Please refer back to our previous emails (case # 5-3531000005549), and carefully follow the instructions provided.

Should you have any additional queries regarding this matter, we encourage you to explore the available resources in the YouTube Help Center at: http://support.google.com/youtube/ which contain related articles in a variety of topics.

Sincerely,

The YouTube Team

WOLVOMAN80 SENDS; Hello YouTube, NO IT HAS NOT BEEN DEALT WITH.

WOLVOMAN80 SENDS; It will be dealt with when I am paid.

WOLVOMAN80 SENDS; BTW These conversations are being kept and (maybe) used in a video on YouTube to show/expose how useful/helpful YOUTUBE support team ARE!

WOLVOMAN80 SENDS; I am owed at least £50000. And my solicitor has advised me to request a list of YouTube‘s full earnings from my videos, so I am making that request now. Send me a breakdown please.

I also send YouTube a picture of my videos earning stats, the image clearly shows that YouTube paid me NOTHING for the first two years despite my channel peaking at 30000 views per day. The image also shows that despite millions of views my most viewed videos have paid me nothing, despite ads on every one of them!

YOUTUBE REPLY; Again, your YouTube Analytics shows you estimated earnings.

WOLVOMAN80 SENDS; Again, and as illustrated in the image I sent you, your silly and completely inaccurate stats are not counting any profit for any of my top videos. Again last year they showed $13000 only to go back down to zero the next day and again can I have a breakdown of the earnings that YOUTUBE (NOT ME) have made from advertising on my videos please?

WOLVOMAN80 SENDS; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1duTbJzQ8_E This video will explain. I have others if you are still confused. (The link is a video describing how I am being ripped off and profited from by Google.)

Next day WOLVOMAN80 SENDS; Why am I being ignored? Is this how you treat all YouTube partners? Why do Google think they have the right to make thousands and pay me nothing for my work?

3 days later WOLVOMAN80 SENDS; http://wolvoman80.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/i-am-youtubepartner-part-1.html

Have a butchers at that. (The link is a blog about my delightful experience of talking to YouTube)

3 days later WOLVOMAN80 SENDS;  Is that all the assistance that you are going to offer me? And do you stand by your conclusion that the video views and the estimated earning are correct?

I am again ignored by my “partners” at YouTube.

PLEASE LET US TAKE YOUR HUMAN RIGHTS, ITS FOR YOUR OWN SAFETY!

We in Great Britain often boast about our country being tolerant and free, a country with equality and freedom, freedom of speech, freedom of expression and equal rights for all, I disagree with this hypothesis.

When I look at Britain I fail to see what the masses see, instead I see a nation of conformists, I see a nation of sad drunks and drug addicts sitting in front of the TV drinking and working and drinking their lives away. I see a nation obsessed with over priced gadgets, football and reality TV, unfortunately reality TV is the only reality they are interested in. I see a nation that our masses stand by and watch as our sick government cut benefits for the sick, disabled and the poor, a nation that believes that people that do not take part in the system should not even to be allowed to eat. I see a nation that watches as our government destroy Iraq, Libya and next Syria, and we then have the nerve to call Muslims terrorists. A nation where the PRIME MINISTER is a known arms dealer and our monarchy have a history of oppression, slavery and war, yet we still worship them. I see a nation that claims to care for children, yet we stand by and watch as corporations like Tesco and Next exploit some of the poorest children in the world, with child labour and slavery, facts like this will not stop the masses from shopping at these sickening companies. I see corruption in the banks, the government, police and the media, I see a nation that is governed by money our politicians are puppets to the banks and corporations.

Poor people are punished and sometimes locked up for minor offences like possession of Cannabis, shop lifting, and not paying taxes when MPs over claim millions and bankers receive huge bonuses despite the banks being bailed out, MPs and bankers are obviously above the law in fact they are the law. The lifestyles of the western world has a negative impact on the lifestyles of many people around the world, but we don’t care, we are to busy watching X factor.

First Published 28/08/2013

PLEASE LET US TAKE YOUR HUMAN RIGHTS, ITS FOR YOUR OWN SAFETY!

Theresa May, most of the British media and the conservative party have started an attack on human right laws, they use examples like Ten “highly dangerous” terror suspects were freed in 2004 after Law Lords ruled their detention without trial breached their human rights, An illegal immigrant from Bolivia was allowed to stay in the UK – because he had a cat and Terror suspect Abu Qatada and eight others were awarded £75,000 for a “breach” of their human rights in 2009. Judges in Strasbourg decided the British Government should never have held them without trial following the attacks on 9/11, saying it violated their right to liberty and security. Taken from the Sun.

Like most laws that we have in Britain Human right laws are not perfect but they are important, there is no doubt that sometimes they do benefit the wrong people but most of the biased corporation controlled mainstream media fail to mention that most of the time human right laws DO protect the right people unlike the corporation controlled British government who bail out banks and allow billion pound corporations huge tax breaks and even free labor paid for by the taxpayer on workfare! which of the human right laws would  Theresa May like to get rid off?  Freedom of expression and conscience? or is it the Right to personal liberty that pisses her off? or no arbitrary searches or seizures? The British media, the American government and the British government have done more harm to this country and the world than Abu Qatada or any terrorist I can think of, the British and American governments kill hundreds of thousand of people in Iraq, and then the British media and the sheeple  have the nerve to moan about Iraqi refuges and immigrants for hating Britain, WAKE UP BRITAIN AND USA, if Iraqi soldiers come to our countries and destroyed our cities, kill our children and steal our natural resources we would hate them to, unfortunately most people in Britain are still failing to see the real terrorist of the world.

Even if Abu Qatada is the dangerous terrorist that our government and media tell us that he is than taking human rights from the whole of Great Britain just because of a very small amount of people would be letting the terrorist’s take our freedom and therefore a sure sign the terrorist are winning the war on terror, but I believe The Sun newspaper, most other sections of the corrupt British media and the British government are attacking human right laws, they are using terrorism as an excuse to weaken human rights. So FUCK THE RACIST PROPAGANDA FILLED SUN Newspaper, Rupert Murdoch, News Corp, David Cameron, Theresa May and FUCK anyone that is stupid enough to believe the BS and biased propaganda they talk, to the people that do believe this BULLSHIT, to whom I say this, learn your lessons from history, you all thought Jimmy Saville was a generous old man because the British media told you he was despite the fact that most of the media knew what Jimmy Saville was like, you also believed there was weapons of mass destruction in Iraq yet the only WMD’s I see are the weapons of mass detraction that are being used by the British Media and most of the British people!Theresa-May_1716248c

First Published 6/9/2013

DAVID CAMERON VS THE INTERNET.

Why does David Cameron hate the Internet?

David Cameron has used every excuse possible to attack the internet, from slowing the spread of information of gangs planning “disorder and crime” to internet porn, he even used the suicide of a 14 year old girl as an excuse to start a attack on free speech online, he calls it a “war on porn” or  “a war on thugs” but anyone that is even slightly capable of critical thinking must consider the chance that these internet attacks are not wars on porn or thugs but in fact they are wars on the internet in general. Why do David Cameron, News Corporation and many others in the so called elite hate the internet? The answer is simple, because the internet show them for the corrupt puppets they really are! The internet embarrasses the mainstream media, the government and the lobbying and tax avoiding corporations, the internet exposes the governments war crimes, the corporations child labor and lack of respect for human rights and the massive levels of propaganda used by our biased media. The internet exposes it all in a way that it has never been exposed before and due to this our governments, monarchies and the world elite are beginning to lose control.

Before the internet it was very hard to spread a message but the internet has changed that, thanks to the internet people like me can have our videos viewed by millions of people all over the world without having to rely on the mainstream media. David Cameron and the mainstream media will make excuses and reasons for why the government should take control of the internet, excuses like but we must protect children or accuse people of spreading hate, but the truth is they do not care about children if they did then why do they not speak against child labor used by Tesco, Next and other British corporations, as for spreading hate, the mainstream media spread more hate then anyone else I can think of, they attack the sick and disabled, the unemployed, immigrants, Muslims even worse the propaganda and lies they print paves the way for oil wars and natural resources wars.David Cameron, Barrack Obama or any government should NOT be allowed to touch the internet.

First Published 13/08/2013

Conservative party are to block “Extremist websites”

When Paul Goggins, a Labour Party member of parliament, asked what Cameron plans to do regarding a warning from the Security Service about “Islamist extremism,” Cameron replied that one of the steps the U.K. is taking is blocking websites. “We have had repeated meetings of the extremism task force – it met again yesterday – setting out a whole series of steps that we will take to counter the extremist narrative, including by blocking online site,” Cameron said before praising Facebook for removing videos of a beheading. “We will take all these steps and many more to keep our country safe.” So David Cameron wants to block Extremist websites, websites that he claims are a threat to our national security. The trouble is David Cameron is the leader of an extremist government, a government that believe in corporate child slavery, poverty, work for benefits and murder for oil and profit. We have an extremist government that attacks the sick and disabled with sick benefit cuts, humiliating work programs telling people that they are protecting the country by censoring the web of the corruption of themselves and many multinational corporations. If “extremist” websites are to be censored, which they already are the conservative governments website should be the first one censored, and Mark Zuckerberg is nothing more than a weak little geek that got lucky by stealing a friends idea, of coarse David Cameron is going to praise Mark Zuckerberg they are a couple of snake eyed weaklings they would not survive for five minutes in the ghettos they are creating.

 

First Published 21/12/2013

Recently the British government have began full blown censorship on social media many political Facebook pages are having their posts hidden, all in a desperate attempt to try to keep control of the people and the internet. The government are panicking and they are not thinking about what they are doing. Why do the British government want to hide political posts? Is it because the internet is FULL of insults and complaints aimed towards our government? In this simple experiment I will write “David Cameron is a ………”  and I will let Google finish the sentence, I will repeat the search with other well known MPs. Google will search millions of pages on the internet and give it’s top four answers, the results are shocking!

First Published 29/3/2014

THE KING OF HYPOCRISY?

hypocrisy

Britain is to challenge an EU agreement to slash bankers’ bonuses at a meeting of European finance ministers next week after Boris Johnson condemned the proposal as a “deluded measure”. George Osborne or the Treasury minister Greg Clark will represent Britain at the meeting next week to relay what No 10 described as real concerns about the proposal. David Cameron and the British government have cut incapacity benefit, the NHS, housing benefits and child benefits but they stand against a cap on banker bonuses, do they think the bankers deserve to get these ridiculous bonuses when they are cutting sickness benefits? Britain’s Deficit is not so important now the bankers (David Cameron’s puppet masters) might lose out as well.

David Cameron  is so full of hypocrisy its shocking here are just a few examples;

“Things got out of hand & we’d had a few drinks. We smashed the place up and Boris set fire to the toilets.”

– David Cameron, 1986.

“The looting and arson last night were criminality, pure and simple. Justice will be done and the people will see the consequences for their crimes”

– David Cameron, August 2011

“History is sweeping through your neighbourhood” -David Cameron on the Egyptian riots, February 2011

DAVID Cameron was later accused of cynically using the Egyptian revolution as cover for an arms dealing tour of the Middle East.

He has a business delegation that includes eight firms involved in the arms trade.

BAE Systems, Thales UK, Atkins, Rolls-Royce, Cobham Group, Qinetiq, Babcock ­International Group and Ultra Electronics are all looking to make lucrative deals.

But Sarah Waldron, of the Campaign Against the Arms Trade, said that it “beggared belief” that Mr Cameron was helping sell arms to the region despite bloodshed in Libya.

David Cameron goes on T.V and condemn’s Jimmy Carr for tax avoidance, he did not mention the massive tax avoidance of his friends at News corporation, Tesco, Vodafone.

David Cameron cuts housing benefits, sickness benefits and forces people on benefits to work for billionaire corporations  just to receive benefits, at the same time he claims £21000 per year for his second home! These greedy politicians always claim they must have a second home for work reasons but can’t they just move closer to where they are working? like the rest of us would have to, thanks to the new bedroom tax MPs are allowed spare houses, but we are not allowed spare bedrooms!

When the British government cut benefits from parents of the poorest families and force them from there homes, stop there benefits and even lock them up for not paying council tax, its the children of the affected families that suffer the most. Should children of the poorest families in Britain suffer to fund corporate tax avoidance and oil wars?

David Cameron praised the courts and encouraged tough sentences for the people involved in the rioting and looting but claims thousands on his expenses “which are paid for by the taxpayer” illegally he did not receive a tough punishment he simply paid it back!

David Cameron declares a ”all-out war” on gangs, despite being a member of Bullingdon club (a gang known for heavy drinking and causing criminal damage) as was Boris Johnson and George Osborne.

David Cameron cuts the NHS but does not want to cut banker bonuses! He wants a £26000 per year cap on benefits but refuses to put a cap on MPs expenses and tries to stop the EU fro enforcing a cap on banker bonuses! He uses the British media as a propaganda tool but still can not win an election without Nick “the traitor” Clegg.

 First Published 26/8/2013

RIP OFF.

To say that England is expensive is a bit of a understatement, its like saying hell is warm, living in England is not expensive, its a fucking RIP OFF, Income tax, VAT, National insurance, high petrol prices, high food prices, even our water is expensive and sold to us by corporations. Is it just me or is anyone else sick of being ripped off?

My family were ripped off by millionaire corporations when we were in business, corporations like Persimmon home and Taylor Woodrow, my parents were then taken ill and then ripped off by the health insurance they purchased from Lloyds TSB, they thought they were protected, unfortunately for them they were not! as if that is not enough they were then ripped off again by the bank costing them nearly £80000. By know they are both ill and my mom was blind but that does not stop Mortgages PLC from giving them ridiculous advice and later charging them £64000 of which £54000 was interest in 18 months.

Then we have bank charges of up to £200 per week and phone bills, recently I was charged 50 pence per minute by my mobile phone company for phoning a “free number, 0800”. When I first had broadband connected in 2007 it was costing me £10 per month now its £30 per month, granted the connection is faster but all that does is allow adverts on every page, in 2007 we did not need super fast broadband because internet pages had less adverts, therefore there was less information for the computer to load.

Recently I have been ripped off by YouTube, they first show that they owe me $12000 the week before they are due to pay they clear my estimated earnings to 34 cents, that’s for 14 million YouTube views along with adverts before the video, at the bottom of the screen and on the side bar, due to false claims by companies like BBC, News corp and others.

Gas and energy are ridiculously high, there is one thing in Britain that does not go up as fast as our food and petrol prices do, and that is our wages. No wonder they call Britain rip off Britain, the most concerning thing is they do all this for ONE SIMPLE REASON.

That reason is to protect the super rich and the corporations they own! they allow corporations and the super rich to carry on making huge profit, avoid paying tax, receive cheaper or even free labor and effectively slave us! Its time to stop this sick government before they are literally charging us to breathe and cutting off peoples air supply for not keeping up with payments.

The Bromford living RIP OFF.

In December last year me and my family moved in to a Bromford living house, after private renting for 10 years, we moved because our old house was damp and on a busy road, and with the building trade nearly dead we could no longer afford the rent the landlord wanted. They handed us the keys in November but we were already contracted to our old place until December, “not a problem” a Bromford living adviser told us, “back date the housing benefit and they will cover you on two houses for the month you move”, this turned out to be bad advice as back dating the housing benefit was not allowed, meaning we are in £450 debt before we even move in.

We was happy with the new house and we had no complaints about Bromford living at all, we agreed to pay back the £450 that the benefits would not cover, there were no problems at all, other than dodgy plumbing left before we moved in caused a leak, ruining a new carpet that we had just paid £200 for.

We kept up payments for a few months until the week my girlfriend was in hospital having a baby, that week we did not pay, we had not even got home when the phone rang, it someone from Bromford living chasing a £30 payment, they can hear the baby screaming in the back of the car, my girlfriend is to polite but they insist on talking right there and then, I snatch the phone from my girlfriend and say “Stop harassing us” and hang up.

Two days later we get a letter threatening extra charges of £150 or eviction if they do not receive the payment, and all this over £30! they still received their rent. They come around our house every 3 months ticking boxes and looking around, they give us a red warning if we residents are very naughty and they want us out, amber if we residents are sometimes naughty but sometimes good and a green if we are really good, what next? Well done stickers and naughty corners? For the record we are on amber due to the £450 arrears that was added before we moved in.

Since moving in to our Bromford living house we have had nothing but problems with them so many problems I made a list.

1. Poor plumbing done before we moved in caused a huge leak ruining a brand new floor.

2. Bromford living advisers do not want to talk about replacing the floor or paying us damages, instead they would rather talk about useless work programs.

3. Bad advice from a Bromford living representative lead to us being in debt before we even moved in.

4. They threaten court action and eviction because we owed the £30

5. They tell us to contact them but their 0330 costs ridiculous amounts to ring on my mobile phone, in fact one call to a “free” number (not Bromford) cost me £15 pound!

So I give Bromford a red warning, threatening to make families homeless over £30 shows the greed of Bromford living and other housing associations around the UK.

 THE SEVERN TRENT WATER RIP OFF.

Yesterday I received a bill from Severn Trent Water, I was shocked to see my bill was £800, so I phoned them. Little did I know when I signed for my last property that the whole street waste and sewage run through our back garden, and I did not even notice until one day when I step outside and our garden it full of waste, waste from the street and from the pub that was 5 doors away from me. It was a mess, the garden stank all the time and I had three children at the time, Severn Trent did clean it up but It was not long before the smell began to come back, because of this we decided to move house and I refused to pay the bill for the water.

I hear nothing from Severn Trent until yesterday the 25th November, I receive a bill for a shocking £800, I ask for a break down of my bill, how is my bill £800? they want £400 for my old property despite flooding my garden with sewage from the whole street, they also wanted £400 for the last 7 months! How do Severn Trent water justify charging that, what about people that can not afford it? Are they not allowed to drink or wash?

I tell the I am not paying that for my disgusting tap water, the water is wrank and water supply is an essential and therefore should be free and covered in the ridiculously high taxes we pay. What next? They will be charging us to breathe.

Who are Severn Trent to charge such extortionate prices for water? Its another example of rip off conformist Britain. The government come on TV tell us Severn Trent now own Britain’s water supply and no one even questions it, everyone’s OK with that.

Britain’s water supply was never owned by the government for the government to sell it in the first place, what kind of stupid government sell their water supply? The same kind of government that only care about one thing, money. I believe the time has come to stop paying Severn Trent, I believe that our taxes could easily cover the cost of maintaining Britain’s water supply and sewage systems, after all our taxes cover David Cameron’s and other politicians second homes and the ridiculous monarchy, surely free water to the masses is a bigger priority.

 FINANCIAL OMBUDSMAN RIP OFF.

Are you having trouble with your banks? Have your bank unfairly charged you for unauthorized overdrafts or missed direct debit payments, leaving you with no money for electric, gas or even food for your kids? or have your bank gone into your account and illegally taken a large sum of money from your bank account? Lloyds TSB have taken over £80000 from one account, after a retiring (from business) couple sold 1 of their 2 houses!  Never fear we are protected, by the Financial Ombudsman, the banks must be shitting their selves!

Back in about 2009,  after my girlfriends bank illegally taken money from her bank account (over £3500 in a 5 year span, sometimes taking as much as £140 per day and other occasions £200 per week) I contacted the Financial Ombudsman, and explained the situation, i was confident that I was going to get the money back after all the charges were undeniably ridiculous especially when you think she was a single mother with 2 children at the time and on benefits, they had left her with no money for gas and electric at times so when I speaking to the Financial Ombudsman service they agreed the charges were ridiculous and illegal and they were also confident that she would have it back.

The Financial Ombudsman told us to get a copy of all our bank statements over the last 5 years and highlight all the charges and post the statements with the overdraft and missed direct debit charges on them, they added up to £3500, we waited over a month to receive the bank statements from Nationwide Building Society, I posted the statements to the Financial Ombudsman,  i waited over a month for a reply, i than get a letter telling me they have warned Nationwide Building Society about these charges and I should hear something from them soon.

Three weeks later we get a letter from the Nationwide Building Society offering us £400, we rejected the offer and called the Financial Ombudsman again, “take it” they said “we can get the rest later” so we take the £400, mean while the corrupt blatantly paid off supreme court over turned earlier court rulings that would have allowed the Office of fair trading to investigate bank charges, effectively legalizing bank charges of up to £300 per week, the Office of fair trading said they will fight on but there as been no sign of any change yet.

After the ruling, the Financial Ombudsman still insisted on we could still get it back, I had just lost my job, we were falling behind on rent and the Ombudsman said we could claim financial hardship, a few weeks later we get a letter back from the bank refusing to pay out, I inform the Ombudsman and he informs me there is nothing else they can do because of the change in law! So after months of long phone calls, massive phone bills, waiting on hold to speak to both the Financial Ombudsman service and Nationwide Building Society, posting letters, waiting for replies  I got back £400 from the £3500 they had illegally taken over the years and I should not be surprised, after all who funds the Financial Ombudsman service? the answer is of coarse the banks! the Financial Ombudsman service WORK FOR THE BANKS NOT FOR THE PEOPLE, they make everything as slow possible and in my experience the Financial Ombudsman service seem to be completely powerless and absolutely useless at doing there jobs, that is unless their job is to waste your time in that case 5 stars for the Financial Ombudsman service, well done lads.

SONY AND GOOGLE RIP OFF.

Recently I have made a new video called There were giants on the Earth in those days, for this video I used the music The Grande Messe des morts, Op. 5 (or Requiem) by Hector Berlioz it was composed in 1837 making it PUBLIC DOMAIN music meaning multinational parasites like Sony DO NOT OWN the music, that will not stop Sony from trying to claim rights to the music forcing my video to be blocked in certain countries. They do this for multiple reasons, reasons like they can claim advertising money made by video views that the video may get, Sony and YouTube make the profit from the adverts that are now taking over YouTube and the video maker does not make SHIT! Sony own and control over 80 record labels, they control nearly all modern day music and many different aspects of the entertainment industry but this is not enough for them. Sony insist on making profits on YouTube when they have no legal right to do so and from other people work. The greed of these huge multinational corporations is killing the internet, because of this greed people viewing videos on YouTube are now being forced to sit through adverts on nearly every video added and usually the video makers are paid nothing as these parasites claim the rights and Google do not question them, they simply remove the videos. Sony are not the only company to do this, I have also had videos removed due to false copyright claims by the BBC, News Corporation and Hearst Corporation, these companies either do not fully understand copyright laws like fair use and public domain laws or they simply choose not to follow these laws and cash in on videos that they have not legal right to, knowing that most people would not understand the laws and would not question the copyright claims made these by greedy Vultures.

DARK DISTURBING ART FROM A DARK DISTURBING GOVERNMENT!

DARK DISTURBING ART FROM A DARK DISTURBING GOVERNMENT!

The artist of this dark disturbing image was in a very dark frame of mind when he decided to draw members of the synagogue of Satan. Look at the disgusting untrustworthy smirk on this horrible demon’s face as he attacks the disabled and the poor to fund wars and evil doings at home and abroad.
If I was this ugly I would have refused a vanity portrait and saved the taxpayer some money and donate the money that is saved to FOODBANK
Why would our government pay nearly £12000 of taxpayers money on portraits of Lord of the rings characters?
The artist of this controversial image of a rich war criminal who’s decisions lead to the deaths of hundreds of thousands Iraqis must have been in a very very dark place at the time of painting this!
Don’t worry yourselves about these disgusting, disturbing images they only cost the taxpayer £250000 and the government have saved loads more money then that by ripping off the poor, sick and disabled.
First Published 31/1/2014

NEW MUSIC IS REALLY SHIT, OR AM I OLD?

How bad is new music? Is it because I am getting old or is new music horrible? I love all music from every era but now! I like Mozart, Beethoven, Handel, Robert Johnson, Dean Martin, Johnny Cash (all time fave), Pink Floyd, the Beatles, the Eagles, Elvis Presley, Bob Marley,  the Prodigy, Nirvana, Guns N Roses (all time fave), Michael Jackson, Green Day, Iron Maiden, Eminem (all time fave), Immortal Technique, Tupac and loads more, but modern day POP music is honestly lame. It is not because I am getting old, is it?

Nicki Minaj? Justin Bieber? Beyonce? Jesse J? Katy Perry? One Direction? Olly Murs? I know lame music has always existed but surely this mainstream shit is the worst music that has been in the recorded history of music. I also know that somewhere among all the mass produced mainstream, corporate shit, like a diamond in the sewage, there must be something good, until I find it I will have to carry on listening to music from better times.

If the music industry is going to destroy your soul, corrupt your child and make a fortune from us all at the same time they should at least use talented people and good music to do so,  instead of this bunch of soulless, talent-less shit we have all over the charts, radio and YouTube today.

Who is watching and buying this shit? Have seen the view counts on YouTube? Gangnam Style has over two billion views, how the fuck and why have over two billion people watched that shit? No disrespect to the writers but Gangnam style is horrible, irritating and shit but also genius. I must be making the wrong kind of videos, why make political and mythological documentaries when I can just talk shit over a repetitive beat and have a load of pretty fake looking girls dancing around me? I do not blame PSY for making Gangnam style and I bet PSY are as stunned as anyone of the success and riches that Gangnam style has bought.

Gangnam style is just another example of the masses following ridiculous trends, I wish I thought of it.

 

CMSweb2

GOVERNMENT/CORPORATE BAILIFFS = THUGS

Some of the worst thugs in Britain are the bailiffs the government and corporations send out to collect their debts, they use intimidation tactics on the elderly and the poor, they take furniture and other belongings without permission or compassion and charge you £200 for it! and that’s all legal! Some sections of the British media like the government propaganda filled Express and Star even praise them up!

READ Express and Star PROPAGANDA here

The trouble is bailiffs use bully tactics, they use intimidation on people that most the time do not have much money but that’s OK they will just take your furniture and sell it at a auction if it gets them a few quid, they even go after the elderly, the sick and the disabled!

Pay your debts people say and you will not get bailiffs knocking your door, but who collects the debts from the corporations and governments when they rip us off with bank charges and massive tax on cars, tobacco, alcohol, food, gas, electric and everything else they can possible tax!

Tesco, Amazon, News corp, Vodafone, and other massive corporation pay as little as 1% tax on their profit, why don’t the government send bailiffs to the tax evaders, take there stock and auction it? because the British government are puppets to the corporations and the banks.

A 71 year old woman was jailed for a second time after refusing to pay her council tax! Josephine Rooney was sent to prison two years ago after withholding payment because she believed the local authority had failed to prevent her once-elegant street from being overrun by drug dealers and prostitutes.

 

bailiff_billy1

PROUD TO BE BRITISH?

trc-union-zoom_2

There was a time that I was proud to be English and I believed Great Britain to be among the fairest and best countries in the world, that time has gone. Great Britain is a country that looks after the elite, Great Britain fights wars in third world countries and kills women, children for oil and profit and then we have the nerve to suggest we are a tolerant society free of racism, a tolerant society free of racism? what makes us British believe that? is it the way we tolerate children in third world countries making clothes and toys for our massive billionaire corporations? or the way we tolerate the corrupt banks and government doing what ever they want? we also tolerate millions of cheap foreign workers coming in to the country working for next to nothing, being exploited themselves and making almost impossible for our own youth to get a job, but that’s OK Tesco, Debenhams, or some other massive corporation to the rescue! our youth can go work for them for there benefits! Cadbury’s is now owned by Kraft, Walkers is now owned by Pepsi, small or medium size businesses have no chance of competing with these billion pound corporations, they pay for shelf space, this is why all British supermarkets sell the same products.

The British government tax everything they possible can as much as they possible can, Income tax, V.A.T, petrol tax, council tax, National Insurance even a new bedroom tax starts in April, but they are also paid to leave loop holes to help million/billionaires pay ridiculously small amounts of tax, but they lock up the poor for not being able to pay there bills on time. Britain is a country that spend more on military operations then they do on educating the youth of the country.

Great Britain is a country that locks people up for smoking or growing cannabis but allows greedy corrupt bankers to scam people out of millions of pounds, the MP’s involved with the expenses scandal have completely got away with there crimes,  why do the British media not report and expose this? its because the people that own and control the media are not paid to keep the British people well informed in fact its the opposite they are paid to keep the masses uninformed and to wrapped up in celebrity gossip, sport and anything but the real news. Its time for the people of Great Britain to WAKE UP but they will probably be to busy watching BGT or some other brain-dead shit!

 

First Published 2/7/2013

DAVID CAMERON IS THE SALESMAN THAT ONLY SELLS SHIT.

In 2006 when in opposition David Cameron said : “Bombs and missiles are bad ambassadors. They can build no democracies.” So why was he so desperate to attack Syria? You would think that David Cameron would be against British involvement in Syria, as he spends so much time talking about Britain’s deficit. The answer to why David Cameron wants involvement for British troops is simple, that is what the puppet masters wish to do, the lobbyists, the bankers and the oil companies. David Cameron has the job of trying to sell the war to the British public unfortunately for him the British public is waking up! After the wars with Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya ALL proved to be morally wrong and more like imperialist wars than a war on terror, the British people have finally spoke out and won, leaving David Cameron looking like a desperate weak man.

David Cameron did not take the defeat well as Labour sources say David Cameron accused Ed Miliband of ‘letting down America’ and ‘siding with Lavrov’ in an angry row before the Syria intervention vote in the House of Commons. In all fairness to David Cameron there are only so many shit products a salesman can sell before the people buying the shit wake up and realize its shit and so far David Cameron has sold the British people a war in Libya, benefit cuts for the sick, disabled and poor, cuts to public services, a rise in VAT, tax cuts for the rich, Workfare and many other stupid ideas and schemes, no wonder the British people are not buying this shit. David Cameron is a good salesman but he sells nothing but shit.

Former Lib Dem leader Paddy Ashdown described the result as “bad for Britain” and claims “Putin and Assad will be celebrating” he also said he is depressed and ashamed that he will now have to wake up and watch children burning on his television, Paddy Ashdown and the government are as usual completely missing the point on this, people are getting sick of wars for profit, lies and hypocrisy, some reports claim that over 1000 people could be dead due to chemical attacks by the Syrian government, although there is uncertainty on who carried out the attacks and even if it was the government that are responsible for the attacks missiles, bombs and guns are only going to kill more people and make things worse. Our government are telling us we can not afford to pay benefits to the sick and disabled and the NHS is to expensive to run, good news for David Cameron, Britain not getting involved in this war will save us millions/billions that can now be spent on looking after the sick and disabled who are suffering as a result of David Cameron’s so called war on benefit scroungers.

Looks like David Cameron, George Osborne and the rest of the Tory party will have to make do with murdering Badgers for now.

First Published 30/08/2013

PWTFU = PLEASE WAKE THE FUCK UP.

PWTFU before we have a fully and legally censored internet and media because the day that happens is the same day we lose our freedom. Information is power and by censoring the internet we are allowing our government to take power from the masses. Even with a uncensored internet corporations are controlling our politicians/governments, not paying tax, fighting wars for profit/oil and propagating agenda that only suit a very small amount of greedy, already rich people/corporations. With a censored internet we would not even know that scandals like this are going on.

PWTFU before David Cameron’s puppet masters own and make profit from the NHS and poor people can not afford basic treatment when the elite and the Monarchies live so long that they are walking around looking like some NAZI ZOMBIE from C.O.D.

PWTFU before we have a full blown police state, secret courts, ID cards and eventually even a micro-chipped population.

PWTFU before vaccinations become compulsory and it becomes law to inject your children with chemicals and cells from aborted fetuses, LIST OF VACCINE INGREDIENTS FOLLOW LINK http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_vaccine_ingredients

PWTFU upper class idiots like David Cameron, George Osborne and Boris Johnson do not have any idea on real life issues, they have more money than sense and they were born with silver spoons in their mouths. They live in a fantasy world of money, Eton, drugs, corruption, and whoring themselves to the corporations that got them into power in the first place.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ILLUMINATI? PWTFU.

Most people do not believe in or even know anything about the Illuminati, once upon a time I was one of these people! I have known the government are corrupt since I was a teenager I just did not realize they were as corrupt as they are. The first time someone explained the Illuminati to me was about 1996, I was 16 and I dismissed it as complete fantasy and bullshit. Our government and elite are worshiping the devil and practicing human sacrifice? And they are trying to take over the world with a new world order? RIDICULOUS!

As I got older and events like 911 and the war on terror started people began to see the corruption in our government, it was now 2006 and I get broadband fitted in my home for the first time, I love watching documentaries on almost any subject (except celebrities fashion and other stupid meaningless subject along the same lines).

As I am searching for documentaries to watch I keep noticing documentaries on the “New world order” and a couple on the “Illuminati” at first I take no notice, until one night I decide to watch a New world order documentary, at first I thought it was fear mongering BULLSHIT, but still interesting to watch. I did not really believe it but I wanted to know more about it.

After watching quite a few documentaries and videos I started reading on it, the more I read the more I was starting to believe it, the more you research Illuminati the more undeniable it becomes, After months/years of research I had finally WOKE UP, the Illuminati are real. When I first told people (my family and friends) they assume that I  must be losing the plot. Until some of them at least research it, they are now full blown “conspiracy theorists” most of my family and friends continue to dismiss it as lunacy, and I do understand their thinking! After all Illuminati was never taught or even mentioned at school, its never spoke about on T.V or in our newspapers but what these people fail to realize is the Illuminati are hidden in plain sight and embedded in our history.

The existence of the Illuminati is a fact, they did exist and still do exist as do many different secret societies like them, such as the Freemasons, Skull and Bones and many others. These secret societies help hide the Illuminati and the highest ranking members of these secret societies are usually the “Illuminati”.

Freemasons are historically link to the monarchy, Freemasonry has played and still plays an important role in the history of the British Empire and of the Royal family of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha) also known in the 20th century as the House of Windsor. Masons use infiltration, blackmail and financial rewards to get their way.

The internet is full of “proof of the Illuminati” and although some of it is wrong, some of it is right but the internet is not the best place to find proof of the Illuminati, the best place to look for proof of the Illuminati is the world! The worlds monarchies and aristocracy, all these Lords, dukes and ladies and other fancy titles they use to make themselves feel better than the rest of us. Look at the wealth distribution and the bank of England’s secret owners, look at the federal reserve our debt is their profit.

If you do not believe in the Illuminati then PWTFU meaning Please Wake The Fuck Up, open your mind and do some real research, because the Illuminati is a fact, what the Illuminati are and what they do is debatable.

 

First Published 30/09/2013

THE SUN BEHIND PAYWALL.

Last month the Sun online went behind a paywall, one pound per month to read a newspaper sounds like a good, fair price. After all good journalism comes at a cost, the problem is the Sun is not exactly good journalism, unless you class celebrity gossip, football gossip, government propaganda and royal propaganda as good journalism. Not only is the Sun not good journalism it is mind numbing, war mongering, racist BULLSHIT.

According to one report I read, the Sun online would need to find 300000 people stupid enough to pay just to cover the costs of running the website. I hope they fail, not because I hate the Sun, News corporation, Rupert Murdoch or government propaganda, and not because of the Sun’s consistent racism, there failure to break an half decent story or the mind numbing celebrity gossip they print, not even because of their attacks on the sick, poor and disabled and their war mongering propaganda and the way they completely ignore issues like child labour, poverty and slavery but mainly because I hope there are not 300000 people in Britain that are stupid enough to buy this BRAINDEAD shit, the trouble is there probably is, after all it is Britain’s best selling newspaper!

Another point to the Sun going behind paywall is, DO NEWS CORPORATION NOT MAKE ENOUGH MONEY? they own media all over the world, how greedy are these people? yet the Sun newspaper attacks David Icke and accuses him of cashing in and spreading fear, that’s rich coming from the Sun or any news corporation owned company.

CORRUPT MEDIA = DANGEROUS WORLD

Most people that watch the news would now agree that the mainstream media is corrupt, the Leveson inquiry helped expose secret meetings and secret deals between the Conservative party and News Corporation, this was the reason that News Corporation backed and propagated David Cameron’s election campaign.

Despite scandals and facts like this the mainstream media then have the nerve to suggest that online bloggers, blogging anonymously are dangerous and a threat to society, the media claim they spread fear, hate and lies, and I have no doubt that sometimes they do. However I doubt very much that they spread as much fear, hate and lies as the mainstream media do and if people trusted the media people would not have to look else where for information.

The mainstream media insist that conspiracy theories are dangerous, and again this can be true, for example, the conspiracy theories and lies printed by our mainstream media regarding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands innocent Iraqis, conspiracy theories online are not streamed in to millions of households every night, unlike the lies and “conspiracy theories” of our mainstream media.

What the mainstream media either fail or do not want to see is, its not the online “conspiracy theories” that is dangerous, the massive lack of trust in our media and government is the real threat. They lie so much that anyone with an I.Q above twenty would have to question them, all these lies and all this propaganda has led to a massive lack of trust in our media and government, the trouble is, our media and government is the only place that we can get our information from, and surely any half intelligent person would say to themselves “If they would lie about Iraq like they did, they would probably do the same with Syria, Iran or wherever they decide to attack next” the corrupt mainstream media have helped what they call “conspiracy theorists” but others call them “truthers” get recognition. An alternative voice in a world of corporate media can only be good, if you like what they are saying or not.

6 companies

First Published 2/09/2013

Jay Z, Lady Gaga and Justin Bieber are NOT ILLUMINATI.

Jay Z, Lady Gaga, Drake, Lil Wayne and Justin Bieber are NOT ILLUMINATI! And Jay Z, Drake, 50 cent and nearly all other mainstream rappers do not represent black people, in fact they represent the elite to their young fan bases, black, white or brown. They teach them how to act, they pass political and social opinions to their young fan bases through their music. Nothing wrong with that at all, if the political and social opinions are their own, the problem is they are not. The messages in their music are messages they are ordered to pass on to their young fan bases by huge multi national corporations like Sony.

These musicians are merely puppets of the elite, even worse is the fact Jay Z, Lil Wayne and Drake are role models and hero’s for millions of young black people around the world, they claim to represent black people, but they do not represent black people! In fact Jay Z, Drake, Lil Wayne suck rich white mans dicks, metaphorically speaking and literally (probably). They oppress and corrupt their young fans, instead of being positive role models with positive messages they promote gang violence and drugs, whats the reason for this? Because gang violence and drugs oppresses, it keeps the next generation shooting at each other in BULLSHIT so called gang wars instead of having a successful, prosperous life or having the sense to spot the real enemy. The real enemy is the establishment, its bad governing of the country that creates ghettos.

Jay Z, Lil Wayne and Drake are not gangsters, they are puppets, they do not “keep it real” they keep it full of BULLSHIT, if Jay Z were to “keep it real” he would be rapping about living a huge mansion paid for by acting like a pussy puppet and being a sex slave to his mannish looking dog of a wife, no offence meant to the so called O.G Jay Z, well maybe a bit.

Flattering these pricks by saying they are Illuminati is silly, it makes these self obsessed greedy people feel important and they are not, there are millions more from where they come from. They are puppets of the Illuminati that is very different to “being Illuminati.” Jay Z, Lil Wayne, Justin Bieber, 50 cent, Lady Gaga, Rihanna, Nicki Minaj and Drake are bitches for the elite, they are the Illuminati’s whores, Jay Z is big whoring and earning Gs not big pimping.

Surely its time to get rid of this mass produced mainstream shit that has saturated the music industry for a long time now, stop buying this shit, stop listening to it and stop making these sell out whores believe that they are something special when they are not.

HOW TO IRRITATE THE JOB CENTRE, RECORD YOUR INTERVIEWS.

The Job Centre in Britain is notoriously useless at finding people work or long time employment (unless you want to work for benefits or minimum wage for a billion pound corporation that does not pay tax) in that case the Job Centre is the place to be, so when I went to the Job Centre today I did not except much help, for if they were to help today it would be the first time in living memory that they have been any help.

I walk in the job centre and take a seat they are 9 minutes late calling me out, which I don’t mind at all apart from the job centre regularly warn me to be five minutes early for their meetings, which I always are, they can waste our time but we cannot waste their time and if we do “we risk missing appointments and losing our benefits”.

I take my seat and the interview begins, I tell the interviewer about the Department of work and pensions taking down my website with illegal cyber attacks, “how is that stopping you getting a job?” the interviewer asks, to which I tell the truth, I sell DVDs and ebooks using my website for advertising, and selling a small but growing amount, until the cyber attack finished my website off, I did get the website running after the attacks using a different server, but the website lost its places on the Google search engine, it lost at least 95% of its traffic making the website financially impossible to maintain. As I excepted he did not want to talk about that.

Later in the interview he tells me to apply for at least 10 jobs per week! I explain that I claim for 4 kids to find jobs that pay enough to support 4 kids is not easy, I also explain that I am pursuing tens of thousands that Lloyds TSB taken from our family business in 2006, plus tens of thousands more that my family were ripped off when they were taken ill and had to finish the business, again not to my surprise he is not interested. I tell him to find me 10 jobs on his computer for me to apply for, he does not want to do that, I tell him to do a BOC or a better of calculation so I have a idea about what jobs are worth applying for, he does not do that, instead he threatens me with community service and benefit sanctions, what are they going to do? make me and my family homeless and starve us death? and then they call people scum when they turn to crime, the government are the real scum here.

I ask him the question, do you work for people are the government? he answers “the government pay my wage” to which I reply “the taxpayer pays the government” the cheeky prick then says “you are not a tax payer” by now I am pretty fuming and I tell him the truth, when my family was in business we had between 30 and 90 skilled workers on our books, my family business that I worked for, for ten years have paid more tax in that ten years then he will pay in his whole life, If I claim benefits for the rest of my life I would not see the money that our business in taxes. Not to mention money that the bank illegally taken from our business accounts, our business and many businesses like us were bailing out banks years before the tax payer bailed them out.

He then announces (and I do not know how true it is as the job centre feel no way in lying and trying to scare people) that Wolverhampton is the first place in Britain to start making the unemployed do community service (with a new name) to receive their benefit.

Much to his anger I tell him that I have recorded the conversation, that’s illegal he cries as their are CCTV all over the job centre, I will upload the full conversation to Youtube later and that is my advice, record your conversations with the job centre, they don’t like it and it protects you when they lie threaten you with benefit sanctions.