About 6 years ago I added a digital download to Amazon Prime. It still makes between £20 and £50 a month. A few weeks ago I decide I will add a few more titles to Amazon. With YouTube turning in to a propaganda machine of government friendly information and lame American chat show clips I decide to invest more time in to Amazon. WHAT A MISTAKE AND A HUGE WASTE OF TIME.
Failed…. Other peoples YouTube videos uploaded fine (I tried) mine do not! I keep seeing the error Try again later.
I convert the files into Slightly different types of MP4s and use an encoder called H.624 as Amazon recommend, still the same problem.
I take the problem to Amazon’s (super polite but super useless) support. They recommend I add the files to another Amazon service called S3. Amazon call this service “simple storage.”
This is where the fun starts. Amazon S3 console is THE WORST online experience I have ever had. It is about as user friendly as fresh nettles would be a toilet paper substitute. After two weeks of fucking around reading, watching videos and attempting to add videos I still have NO IDEA what the fuck is happening.
Everything I do on S3 leads to a problem. I begin uploading files, after an hour the the upload stops, no reason given just the word error.
I start again after an hour I am automatically signed out. I sign in and start again. This time I have success, wow I’m nearly done I think to myself. WRONG.
I named the file wrong (my fault I should have read more carefully) not a problem I will just rename it. WRONG. To rename the files I have to re-upload it. The files is about 3 gb it takes a while.
I rename the file on the hard drive and re-upload it, done? I wish.
I try to read and understand it but WTF, I’m a video maker not a FUCKING COMPUTER programmer. Why is this so FUCKING complicated? Why can’t I just add to Amazon video direct like people on YouTube are?
I think Amazon are deliberately keeping me off their platform. S3 is useless AVOID AT ALL COSTS. But Amazon video direct is a simple site to use yet every time I upload my own work to it the upload fails.
The Amazon support team are about as helpful as a lump on your balls. Why not just tell the truth? We don’t want your shit on here? I want compensation for the 2 weeks of bullshit I have wasted trying to sort this out.
Amazon is censored.
If you are here for advice on how to use Amazon S3 my advice is don’t bother. Its useless.
I am not a Vegetarian nor a Vegan, I have eaten meat my whole life but in recent years I have made a effort to at least cut down on the meat I eat. I now try to avoid beef, lamb, pork and other meats. I eat Chicken but eventually I want to stop eating that as well. Until recently I drank milk but after reading some of the facts I have been reading I would definitely happily do without milk as well.
Many people online claim (and have been ridiculed for it) that milk contains Pus! By pus I mean disgusting liquid that comes from infected, overworked udders. Are the claims true? Amazingly YES!!!
Farming laws allow for up to 20% white blood cells in your milk, many of these white blood cells ARE from infected overworked udders.
That is not all milk also contains feces as Cows diagnosed with Johne’s Disease have diarrhea, and heavy fecal shedding of bacteria. This bacteria becomes cultured in milk, and is not destroyed by pasteurization. Occasionally, the milk-borne bacteria will begin to grow in the human host, and the results are irritable bowel syndrome and Crohn’s Disease.
And more…. Milk also contains antibiotics and growth Hormones. The Dairy industry and British Farming in general seems to be forgetting Mad Cow Disease and the effects that had on the industry.
I believe the problem is (as usual) money and poor governing leading to weak regulations.
Like most industries the Farming industry tries to produce as much as they can for as little cost as possible thus raising profits by keeping wages and other expenses down. This leads to much animal cruelty, low quality meat and pus, shit and antibiotic filled milk enjoy.
Political CENSORSHIP has accelerated over the last 5 years. Its a Blatant admission of fear by the political elite. They don’t need exposing anymore because they are now exposing themselves as corporate fascists that were built by the people they now oppress and censor.
It don’t matter what you think of Alex Jones this is corporate organized, government and deep state sponsored censorship.
The like bar on the CNN’s YouTube report (Alex Jones had more subs than CNN!!!!) shows exactly what the public think of it.
Google and Facebook is protecting the British establishment with their unfair censorship of British civilians. This undermines British democracy (as if it ever really existed anyway). I would compare these people and their overlords to Nazi’s but these people are worse than Nazi’s calling them Nazi’s would just be an insult……to Nazi’s, obviously. They HATE your freedom of speech, they HATE and oppress the potential power that the Internet has given to people.
If you are in England and reading this Google William Combes, Google the ITCCS. Read about the Queen of England and the MURDER of at least 12 Native Canadians plus the state organized massacre of 50000 Native Canadians.
The Queen of England has recently been “annoyed” by false reports of Prince Phillip’s death as reported widely on the 22nd of July 2018.
Do you people have any idea how hard Facebook and Google are working to prevent this from becoming common knowledge?
It must be like playing a giant planet sized game of wack a mole.
A nurse died after claiming she had been sexually abused by a Satanic cult, an inquest heard.
Carol Myers, 41, claimed her family were part of a cult and abused her before alleging that her mother murdered her sister and set fire to their house to hide the evidence.
But a police investigation found the disturbing allegations were unsubstantiated and her family believe they were false memories dreamt up during controversial recovered memory therapy sessions.
The brother of Miss Myers, who was born Carol Felstead but changed her name, said the claims were a “myth”.
Kevin Felstead told Westminster Coroner’s Court, which was sitting at the Royal Courts of Justice, that her family “fiercely” contest the allegations.
Addressing the court, Mr Felstead said: “I just want to ask that the court acknowledges that Carol developed false memories. She had treatment and memories that were false and demonstrably not true.”
Coroner Fiona Wilcox said she could not rule that Ms Myers suffered from false memories. But she acknowledged that the “extreme allegations that were made of satanic sexual abuse and murder were investigated and found to be absolutely unsubstantiated”.
She added: “I wish to be clear that the family absolutely protest claims that Carol was abused sexually, and that the allegations of Satanic sexual abuse and murder that she made in life were investigated by police and found to be unsubstantiated.”
Ms Myers was found by police dead and next to tablets on her bed in her flat in Wandsworth, south London, on June 29 2005.
She had suffered from “post-traumatic stress-style” flashbacks and had been receiving counselling since 1985, when she contacted the Samaritans, the court heard.
Over the course of the next two decades she made disturbing allegations accusing her family of abuse.
But her family blame her memories on her counselling sessions, claiming that she went to the doctor with a headache and that set in motion a chain of events that led to the extreme allegations.
Just weeks before her death in June 2005 she contacted her brother Richard out of the blue and said she was lonely and talked of moving back to Stockport to be near her family, who she promised to visit the following week.
But she never did. Richard wrote his sister a letter on June 29, the same day she was found dead.
Police were called to Ms Myers’s home by Fleur Fisher, a therapist and friend who said she called 999 while on a train after not being able to get hold of her for three days.
She told police Ms Myers may have overdosed and she was likely to be in her bedroom.
Asked why she said this, Dr Fisher said she was worried because she could not contact her and “I knew she had often had to struggle against suicidal feelings”.
She said Ms Myers struggled with her mental health over many years. She took an overdose in 1992, had self-harmed and had “flashbacks from some kind of earlier experience”.
The coroner returned an open verdict as to the cause of Ms Myers’ death.
Speaking after the inquest, Mr Felstead said his sister had been given therapy “that would shame a medieval quack and she ended up in a horrific condition”.
He placed the blame for her disturbing accusations of abuse with the therapists who counselled her.
He said: “She was regressed and hypnotised. She came to believe that her family were the leaders of a Satanic cult responsible for mass murder.
“It included members of parliament, including two former members of Margaret Thatcher’s cabinet. My mother was said to have murdered a baby and burnt the house down to hide it.
“Once Carol injured her shoulder by falling down some stairs. But recorded in the psychotherapist’s notes was that the injury was the result of being suspended in chains from Satanic ritual abuse.”
He said there was always a perfectly normal explanation, but claimed that his sister’s wild claims went unchallenged by her therapists.
And while the Felstead family may never know the exact cause of Ms Myers’ death, they hope her case will be a warning to other families enduring similar accusations, and that lessons are learnt.
A strange story that sounds even more far fetched than Conservative politicians actually taking part in satanic abuse especially when we consider rumours the of Ed Heath, Enoch Powell and many others and the their connections to Jimmy Savile, the ninth circle, the ITCCS allegations and so on.
Like many YouTubers and bloggers I have been oppressed for years. Since making a video called Britain’s Paedophile elite that oppression seems to have worsened. My videos are invisible I can’t even find them unless I am signed in to my account or if I search the exact title. Instead of taking me to court for slander (as they would if I was lying) the British government have decided to shut me down. First they stopped me acting as self employed, then they kept me waiting 16 weeks to receive any form of support, now they’re using Google and Facebook to hide my posts.
How the powerful have fallen if panic hiding is all they have. Things are changing, the power is shifting. North Korea and the USA are making peace deals, the mainstream media is no longer as effective as it once was at manipulating the masses, England are in a semi final of a world cup. WTF? Strange days.
Google enforce GOVERNMENT SHUT DOWN IN return for low tax bills and government grants.
Looking at Ed Heath, the evil sick and twisted Conservative Party,
Google support and protect paedophiles. Sergey Brin Supports and protects paedophile rapists. Larry Page Supports and protects Paedophile rapists. Eric Schmidt, Mark Zuckerberg, the BBC, News Corporation, NSPCC, Supports and protects Paedophile rapists.
Google oppress and silence abused victims of elitist Paedophiles rings to protect rich individuals.
Google shut down Conservative opposition
Google protect rapists and paedphiles for money. KILL GOOGLE.
Third time uploaded due to the fact Google protect CONSERVATIVE PAEDOS in the British government
England are in a quarter final of a world cup for the first time since 2002! If they win they will be in their first world cup semi final since 1990 and only their third world cup semi ever!
The nation is excited but also as always deluded! England so far have played shit! They have had the easiest run up to the semi’s or even the final I have ever seen any team have. Avoiding Germany (who was knocked out in the first round) and Brazil, Uruguay, France, Spain, Portugal all the big teams, they’re either out all the other side of the draw.
So far in their four games they just about beat Tunisia, thrashed Panama 6-1 (sounds impressive until we consider Switzerland beat them 6-0 in a friendly before the world cup started, what the fuck are Panama doing at a world cup especially when we consider there is no Italy, no Holland and no Chile and probably a whole host of other teams that are better than Panama) and the England B team lost to the Belgium B team in a terrible game.
And then you have the game against Colombia. I love South American football but this was not the greatest Colombian team I have ever seen, especially without James Rodriguez a player that would have been the most talented on the pitch if he would have been fit.
England started pretty good but after half an hour they seemed to get progressively worse. Fair enough they won by penalty shootout but be real they were unconvincing, uncreative and very lucky.
What is crazy is England could get all the way to a world cup final with Croatia or Colombia being the best they would have played to get there (the second team played against Belgium in a match that meant nothing due to both teams already qualifying.)
Could they win it? Well Greece won the European cup in 2004. Argentina won it in 1978 despite the Dutch having a great team in that one. Brazil 2002 beat Turkey, Costa Rica, China PR, Belgium (not a great Belgium team), England and Turkey before beating Germany in the final. So there is a chance they could win it.
Sweden have not looked good at all, I watched them against Germany and Switzerland. England should definitely beat them. Croatia have been mixed, they looked good beating Argentina. Russia have also been mixed.
Do I think think England will win it? Hell NO. Why? Since 1990 England have only won 2 world cup games in the knockout round. Since 1966 the only teams England have beat in knock out football Including the European Cup are Belgium, Cameroon, Spain (on penalties,) Denmark, Ecuador and Colombia (on penalties!) Not impressive.
Do I want them to win it? FUCK NO. England fans are a disgrace, to their credit they seem to have behaved in Russia (probably out of fear of being battered by Russian people) but too many England fans are racist, small minded dicks.
E.g. I was on YouTube watching a few highlights and quickly reading comments. The comments section were filled with comments like “well played Portugal from Iran” and “unlucky Iran from Spain” and so on, loads of nice calm comments from normal people enjoying the world cup.
Then we had England and Tunisia, the comments from England fans were disgraceful “cheating Muslims scum” and all kinds WTF man its just a stupid game. Grow the fuck up.
Loving the England fans singing “you’re shit but your birds are fit” to the Swedish fans though and the response from the Swedish fans “go home to your ugly wives” was equally great.
I uploaded this documentary about a week ago. I searched it on YouTube and it shown up every time. I even tried using different browsers and it shown up. Being right at the top of the Jack the Ripper I thought it might just get some exposure. I check the view count is stuck not getting many views at all. Today I thought I would search for the video on a tor browser and surprise surprise its not there. In fact I couldn’t find it at all until I added my channel name.
I’m getting lots of comments recently too many to reply to them all. I have been called so many things! A prick, cretin, lazy, work shy, a racist, conspiracy theorist, a teenage minded cunt, troublemaker, arrogant, parasite, brave, mentally ill, a disgrace, a child (I’m going through the comments finding them atm.) An arse, an idiot, a clown, billy big bollocks (flattered,) a twat, a hero! a legend, a utter tit with no manners, a fucking retard, a Russian spy, autistic, honest, a liar the list is endless that was from a couple of videos (and some recent Facebook messages I received after blogging that Tommy Robinson should be freed) I have over 200 I could go on for ages.. These comments do make you ask yourself questions.
Who is right? Am I a prick? Sometimes no doubt about it. A lazy, work shy cretin? A racist? I do not like this one. A conspiracy theorist? I prefer the terms conspiracy realist or free thinker.
The truth is I’m not sure who or what I am! But that is not important is it (at least not to you.) Whats important is who the fuck are you?
I love boxing, I hate casual boxing fans! Tyson Fury is a victim of ignorance of the sport. All these so called boxing fans come out with comments like “he’s boring,” “he’s shit” all that shit have no idea what they are talking about. Tyson Fury is probably the most naturally talented heavyweight I have ever seen. I love Ali but I struggle to see a way even the great Ali could beat him. I know some boxing fans will point at the fact that Fury has been dropped twice against so called “light punchers” in fights he should not have been dropped and many believe he even lost to John McDermott in the first fight not sounding like a GOAT. But boxing is a strange sport Tyson Fury is a better boxer than he is fighter. When he was young he was too quick to get in to a fight instead of using his jab, size and speed as he did against Wladimir Klitschko. Wladimir Klitschko is a great fighter but Fury made him look terrible.
I like Anthony Joshua but I honestly believe if Fury can get back to the shape and condition he was in when he beat Wladimir Klitschko Fury will outbox Joshua or Wilder. Both will have a punchers chance but Fury has speed, size, power, strength and skill.
The one fighter I think could cause Fury problems is a prime Mike Tyson. I’m not necessarily saying Tyson is better than Ali but styles make fights Tyson’s head movement, speed, power and compactness probably makes him a tougher fight for Fury than Ali would be.
I hope Fury can get back to his best, he is another one of the hated heavyweights. Like Jack Johnson, Sonny Liston, Muhammad Ali and Mike Tyson. Fury is hated by the establishment and like in the case of Jack Johnson, Sonny Liston, Muhammad Ali and Mike Tyson he is hated because of a mixture of racism and the fact he has an opinion. The media are good at projecting the establishments hate on to the public.
If you look at all the great heavyweights from Jack Johnson, Jack Dempsey, Joe Louis, Rocky Marciano, Sonny Liston, Ali, Frazier, Foreman, Holmes, Tyson, Holyfield, Lewis and Klitschko’s. Its hard to imagine most of them beating him I still think a prime Lewis and Tyson would have been he’s two toughest. I might be wrong but I believe the others would struggle to cope with his size, speed and skill.
I hope he gets fit again because the heavyweight division needs him, after watching fight Seferi its clear he still needs more to lose more weight and have a few more fights before fighting Wilder or Joshua but if he can get busy and fit again I believe Tyson Fury could be dominant in the heavyweight division.
Like I said earlier the reason Tyson Fury does not get the credit or recognition he deserves this due the the protection of the establishments hate for him. Did you hear the HBO commentary when he beat Klitschko? Only Roy Jones Jnr given Tyson Fury credit. Max Kellerman and Jim Lampley were not willing to give any credit whatsoever, I thought they were disgraceful. I’ve seen it from Jim Lampley before for example when Barrera, just before the final bell he shown how biased and racist he can be. Even George Foreman picked him up on it and in replays of the fight HBO have cut out his last few sentences (so if you do look for it you need to find a recorded live version and not a updated version replayed years later on HBO.
Tyson Fury also gets stick from the mainstream media in the UK. Reason? They hate the truth, he has said the truth.
Do you have a small business that you wish to expand online? Or would you like a personal blogging space without the complications of dealing with the maintenance of a website? The cost of getting your own website designed and maintained can be very off putting some companies charge up to £600 and that is just for starters. I have ten years experience in creating websites for business and bloggers including this one. I am very familiar with wordpress and the maintenance and problems that come with owning a website.
From just £150 I will set up your new website and I aim to get it up and running within a week.
Why do Google hate the truth? Because the truth is Google and Facebook along with much of the corporate owned Internet is run by greedy, spineless, government puppets have have chosen to fight on the side of oppression, slavery and thievery against humanity for money and power. The truth is Google removes information illegally in order to protect rich paedophiles and war criminals.
My latest videos Introducing the real Winston Churchill and From Hell Jack the Ripper (which looks at the accusation that the royal family were guilty of setting up the Jack the Ripper murders in response to being blackmailed by Mary Anne Kelly) have struggled to views.
I was warned ages ago not to make videos about World War 2 or Hitler due to censorship. For some reason people looking at the real facts of World War Two seems to bother Google a lot.
But I don’t think that is why Google are refusing to notify my subscribers, I think Google are attacking my channel due to my video I uploaded in March Britain’s Paedophile Elite Exposed. In this video I used 100% factual information backed up by mainstream media to prove that the British government are using tax payers money to cover up child abuse! And many members of Parliament have been accused by (people that were bought up in care homes usually) of abusing and even raping children in the “care” of the system. As I said earlier all that I said was printed by MSM.
Google and Facebook (banned me from two account now) are not outraged by the fact that some MPs are doing this, they’re outraged by the fact its being reported.
I was once politically ignorant and unaware. I did not vote in 96 when Tony Blair was Labour leader due to my age but if I could I would have. It was the aftermath of 911 and the war on Afghanistan and Iraq that I believed proved to be Tony Blair’s downfall and the downfall of the Labour Party. I (along with much of the British population at the time) did not believe war in Iraq was necessary but war is what we got. In fact we did not get war we got a one sided bombardment of a country and its people.
I said I would never vote Labour but after years of a Conservative government I did! I voted Miliband despite not really liking him much, the lesser evil and all that baloney.
I was happy and surprised when Corbyn took over and I always felt he would be stopped quickly. I was wrong he is still leader and for that I’m glad but I might not even bother voting him after all! Why?
I was recently on a Facebook group that calls itself We Support Jeremy Corbyn. I shared a blog explaining why I believe Tommy Robinson should be freed, I explain that I am no fan of Tommy Robinson but I do value freedom. I am then accused of being racist! I retaliate with the NOT personal insult of “DICK” I am then told by admin to remove the word or I will be blocked.
My argument for freeing Tommy Robinson is simple. The information he offered was TRUE . The people he accused of being peadophiles were paedophiles. They were found guilty and not imprisoned. I recognize that the information was not legally obtained and distributed but the corporate owned mainstream media is also not always fully complicit with the law. The Leveson inquiry seems to have been forgotten by those demanding Robinson should not be freed. Not to even mention the fact that a rapist should be sent to prison and journalist, political activist locked up for talking? Harsh.
That made me racist according to one person on facebook…Do you know what irritates me the most about this comment, the real racist far right often accuse the left of calling names when in disagreement (the far right are the worst for this shit btw) when people like this accuse people of being racists just because of a disagreement it proves them right and brings the left down to the same level.
I then stated that this country always protect paedophiles of any religion, he asks for proof. I send him a blog I wrote all back up by mainstream media plus more links from many mainstream outlets. The admin of the page then calls me a conspiracy theorist and then deletes my posts.
Normally I remove posts like this one and ban the person outright for having not read the sidebar, but I’m gonna leave this one up to make a point.
The so called “Elite”, this hidden class of secret Emperors doesn’t exist. The people in power are never there for long. At the apex of the pyramid isn’t friendly social gathering and lavish spas where naked women come and feed you grapes and blow you while you’re injected with cocaine and a group of psychic monks feed you information on the future of the stock market, it’s brutal, unfriendly competition. Everyone is a backstabbing, no-good, lying, manipulative and potentially murderous piece of shit masquerading as a human being because those are the required conditions to rise to the surface in the chaos of the market system.
This narrative of them being secret friends is a fantasy of the lower class. Ironically the upper class have a similar nightmare fantasy about the lower class conspiring against them too, and for good reason. In reality the pyramid looks more like a writing pile of struggling bodies all grasping for the top and trying to knock whoever’s there off their spot.
Now to finish, this subreddit isn’t for discussing wild conspiracy theories or promoting your own stupid website, it’s for discussion of the Bavarian Illuminati and their inspired works and ideas, not this modern day perversion the conspiracy theorists throw around.
Also you’re still banned… it’s only a short one though. See you soon.
SCP-1 Illuminati Moderator will next explain how censorship is just your stupid imaginations. Right after he has banned a few more people he disagrees with. PRICK. Lucky for me I hate reddit and see it for what it is, the most censored and controlled flow of government and corporate approved propaganda online.
Aamir Akmel Munir is a Muslim on Facebook that has been critical of Tommy Robinson. Tommy Robinson for the record I believe should be freed but I do not believe that the government are attempting to protect exclusively Muslims paedophile rapists. Jimmy Savile, Cyril Smith, Leon Brittan, Enoch Powell, Lord Mountbatten along with tons of over lords and high ranking members of the aristocracy and the Monarchy and Church have been accused and protected. This is not about religion, they protect paedophile rapists of all religions. It likes their alright with that but you fail to pay your council tax and prison for you. The system does not protect you it was not built to protect victims its built to protect elitist psychopaths.
As long as we are all fighting each other and accusing each other of being the problem, the problem (which is the government and system for allowing these people to go unpunished) is safe.
These people are shameful. I believe in freedom of speech and I am very anti censorship (thats why I hate Facebook, Reddit and Google) I have always believed the best thing to do with stupidity is amplify it. Show people how stupid people can be.
Too all of these idiots I say this. The problem is not Muslim people most of whom live in the shit parts of the UK BTW, the problem is your government. And the reason your government is such of a problem is your ignorance.
So still #FREETOMMYROBINSON but fuck these ignorant fools. I’m ashamed to be English ATM. Lets just hope Tunisia beat them in the World Cup that would upset the fuck out of these small minded fools.
For the record and in response to the comment at the top of the page, you need to learn your history or stop talking. The British have been exploiting and thieving from the middle east and the rest of the world for hundreds of years.
Google are attacking my website and YouTube channel unfairly and my freedom of speech/expression with an almost psychotic hate of the truth. What is the truth? The truth is our system and lives has created a new species of disgusting, bloodsucking parasites. A species that hide among us and feed from us. Below is an example of this parasitic race. They look almost human but can you see the demented inbreed look in his eyes?
Below is another one of these disgusting leeches. These people protect paedophile rapists and organized rings by attacking YouTube channels that dare talk about the endless list of rape allegations made against rich politicians, lords members of the monarchy and prominent aristocrats by literally hundreds of people that were bought up in care homes and under the “care” of the system.
The cross between Pee Wee Herman and an Hills have eyes humanoid thing below also works with ass off to protect paedophile politicians from the USA, UK and indeed all over the world.
The first amendment in the USA only stops governments from interfering with freedom of speech. The disgusting psychotic, corporate CEO inbreed type below and the ones above are actually allowed to carry on destroying freedom without any laws preventing them from doing so. As long as you agree to it. No wonder he is laughing.
Why is it Politicians and members of the establishment can do what they want, say what they want and kill who they want but we the British people are expected to STFU? I’m no fan of Tommy Robinson but this is about freedom.
Snopes so called “fact check tells us”
English far-right activist Tommy Robinson was given a 13-month prison sentence on 25 May 2018, following a Facebook Live video he broadcast from outside a trial of several men accused of a range of child sexual abuse offenses.
The sentence prompted a wave of outrage and protests (mostly, but not entirely, among various factions of the far right) and claims that Robinson’s rights to free speech were being violated in the interests of political correctness; Robinson stated in the video that many of the defendants were Muslim.
On 28 May 2018, the “alternative medicine” and conspiracy theory site NaturalNews.com claimed that Robinson had been silenced without due process in order to “protect Muslim pedophiles” because “the UK government is run by criminal pedophiles who rely on Muslim pedo networks to provide a steady supply of nine and ten-year-old little girls and boys.” Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones described the episode as “historic” and his Infowars web site called the arrest of Robinson “the beginning of the end for free speech in Europe.”
These claims are based on a wild misunderstanding of a very basic principle in the legal system of England and Wales, and of other parts of the U.K. Far from being a “historic” violation of due process, Robinson was jailed because a court judged he had breached the terms of an existing suspended sentence for contempt of court by violating a set of reporting restrictions often placed on the news media and others in the United Kingdom in order to protect the due process rights of defendants and prevent the collapse of trials, something that could jeopardize the conviction of potentially guilty and dangerous individuals.
The “media blackout” on the child sexual abuse trial referred to by NaturalNews.com was not designed to “protect Muslim pedophiles,” but rather to protect the integrity of the child sexual abuse trial itself, prevent a costly re-trial, and avoid witnesses having to go through the trauma of testifying in court again.
Reporting restrictions such as those imposed in the child sexual abuse case in question are temporary, meaning that the news media can reveal previously-censored details after the trial has concluded. So Robinson was not jailed for engaging in journalism, or for merely reporting on alleged criminality. He was jailed for violating a court order, breaching the terms of an existing suspended sentence, and potentially risking the collapse of an ongoing trial.
What a load of bullshit. The “media blackout” on the child sexual abuse trial referred to by NaturalNews.com was not designed to “protect Muslim pedophiles,” but rather to protect the integrity of the child sexual abuse trial itself they said.
I recently made a video called Britain’s paedophile elite here is the link
Now visit my channel check out recent videos and look what it has done to my view count. Bare in mind I share on reddit (I’m banned from at least 15 subreddits) steemit (useless waste of space) and political pages and groups on Facebook. I used to have my own group until Facebook decided they are going to charge people to reach audiences.
I have been saying it since at least 2010 the UK is run by psychopathic, fascist, paedophiles. REVOLUTION NOW and POWER TO THE PEOPLE. #FREETOMMYROBINSON even if he is a dickhead. Lock up the corrupt politicians.
YouTube and the HMRC are attempting to shut me down, its my fault I told the truth and the HMRC and YouTube hate the truth. YouTube are not informing the subscribers of my channel that I have uploaded videos, not paying me for my work using “not suitable for most advertisers” and the HMRC are taking money from me because they “overpaid me when I was working,” sending me huge bills and stopped all self employment benefit that I was entitled to and claiming.
Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill is considered by many to be among the greatest Britain’s that ever lived. In fact a poll by the BBC in 2002 listed Winston Churchill as the Greatest Britain to have ever lived. He was Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1940 to 1945 and again from 1951 to 1955 and even now he is still one of the most recognizable politicians in the world.
He led Britain to victory in the Second World War. His ideologies included economic liberalism and British imperialism; he was a member of the Liberal Party from 1904 to 1924 before joining the Conservative Party, which he led from 1940 to 1955. Churchill represented five constituencies during his career as a Member of Parliament.
He is famous for his wit and ability to lift an audience his words.
His speeches are nearly as famous as the man himself and they are believed to have motivated the nation through the hard times of the second world war most famously his Finest Hour speech. In which he said
Hitler knows that he will have to break us in this Island or lose the war. If we can stand up to him, all Europe may be free and the life of the world may move forward into broad, sunlit uplands. But if we fail, then the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science.
Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear ourselves that, if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men will still say, “This was their finest hour.”
Field Marshal Alanbrooke, Chief of the Imperial General Staff, wrote in his diary on the superbly well-judged manner in which the President made his offer of immediate military assistance, despite Alanbrooke’s being ever ready to highlight what he perceived to be Churchill’s contradictory motivations and flawed character during the war. For example, in his diary entry for 10 September 1944:
… And the wonderful thing is that 3/4 of the population of the world imagine that Churchill is one of the Strategists of History, a second Marlborough, and the other 1/4 have no idea what a public menace he is and has been throughout this war! It is far better that the world should never know, and never suspect the feet of clay of this otherwise superhuman being. Without him England was lost for a certainty, with him England has been on the verge of disaster time and again … Never have I admired and despised a man simultaneously to the same extent. Never have such opposite extremes been combined in the same human being.
So the question is who was Winston Churchill? The answer is a shocking one.
Winston Churchill was born at his home in Blenheim Palace in Oxfordshire, on 30 November 1874. He was born at a time that Great Britain held huge power over the rest of the world. Queen Victoria had just been crowned Empress of India. He was a direct descendant of the Dukes of Marlborough and his family were among the highest levels of the British aristocracy, and thus he was born into the country’s governing elite. His paternal grandfather, John Spencer-Churchill, 7th Duke of Marlborough, had been a Member of Parliament for ten years, His father, Lord Randolph Churchill, had been elected Conservative MP for Woodstock in 1873 and his mother, Jerome Churchill (née Jerome), was from an American family whose substantial wealth derived from finance. The couple had met in August 1873, and were engaged three days later, marrying at the British Embassy in Paris in April 1874. The couple lived beyond their income and were frequently in debt; according to the biographer Sebastian Haffner, the family were “rich by normal standards but poor by those of the rich”.
Aged seven, Winston began boarding at St. George’s School in Ascot, Berkshire; he hated it and did poorly academically and regularly misbehaved.
In September 1884 he moved to Brunswick School in Hove; there, his academic performance improved but he continued to misbehave.
He narrowly passed the entrance exam which allowed him to begin studies at the elite Harrow School in April 1888. There, his academics remained high and he excelled particularly in history—but teachers complained that he was unpunctual and careless. He wrote poetry and letters which were published in the school magazine, and won a fencing competition. His father insisted that he be prepared for a career in the military, and so Churchill’s last three years at Harrow were spent in the army form. He performed poorly in most of his exams.
On January 24, 1895 after an attempted round-the-world journey failed to cure him of his syphilis. Winston Churchill’s father Randolph Henry Spencer-Churchill died like Winston Churchill he is a man of much mystery surrounding him.
Early In 1899 at the invitation of prominent politician Robert Ascroft, Churchill runs for Parliament as part of the Conservative Party. He lost the election but impressed many with his campaigning skills and so his career in politics begins.
Winston Churchill joined the British army in 1893 and developed a keen interest in war correspondence. This led Churchill to work as a war correspondent for The Morning Post and the Daily Mail, in which he was to cover the occurrences of the Anglo-Boer War in South Africa. Soon after his arrival in South Africa, he accompanied a scouting expedition on an armored train. The train was ambushed by the Boers and on 15 November 1899, Churchill was captured and imprisoned in a Prisoner of War (POW) camp. He managed to escape, and with the assistance of an English mine manager, made his way to Delagoa Bay. Upon his return to England he was hailed as a hero.
In the year 1900 Churchill won a seat in the British House of Commons. After a fall-out within his party, Churchill switches to the Liberal Party four years later.
On September 12, 1908 he married Clementine Hozier, who he met at a ball four years earlier, in a packed St. Margaret’s Church at Westminster Abbey. They will go on to have five children together.
From February 1910 to October 1911 Winston Churchill was Home Secretary. Riots erupted in November 1910 in the south Wales town Tonypandy Due to a dispute between workers and the mine owners, culminating in strikes that ultimately lasted almost a year.
When the strikers clashed with local police, Churchill – – sent in soldiers.
There were allegations that shots were fired by the soldiers to control the rioters.
His actions left him unpopular in South Wales.
But a year later soldiers were again called in, this time to strike-related riots in Liverpool. On this occasion the soldiers did fire their weapons and two people were killed.
Nine years later and Churchill is by now Secretary of State for Air and War. He deployed tanks and an estimated 10,000 troops to Glasgow during a period of widespread strikes and civil unrest amid fear of a Bolshevist revolt.
In 1919 when he was Secretary of State for War he urged the use of chemical weapons – primarily against Kurds and Afghans.
“I cannot understand this squeamishness about the use of gas,” He wrote in a memo “I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes,” he continued.
In January 1924, the first Labour Government had taken office amid fears of threats to the Constitution. Churchill was noted at the time for being particularly hostile to socialism. He believed that the Labour Party as a socialist party, did not fully support the existing British Constitution.
In 1924 Churchill accepted the post of Chancellor of the Exchequer in Stanley Baldwin’s Unionist government, a position once held by his father, he formally rejoined the Conservative Party.
As Chancellor of the Exchequer Churchill oversaw Britain’s disastrous return to the Gold Standard, which resulted in deflation, unemployment, and the miners’ strike that led to the General Strike of 1926.
The Conservative government was defeated in the 1929 general election.He spent much of the next few years concentrating on his writing. These years are regularly referred to as his wilderness years, it is at this time that highly respected historian claims that Winston Churchill was struggling to keep funding his huge country estate and his private staff of between 20 to 30 people including cooks, nanny’s, gardeners cleaners and so on.
David Irving claims that Churchill was in this time financed by a primarily Jewish group of businessmen called the focus. He claims that the same group that financed Churchill also propelled him from political wilderness. It was at this time Churchill began his anti Nazi Germany speeches. He attempted to portray himself as an isolated voice warning of the need to rearm against Germany. Though he had a small following in the House of Commons during much of the 1930s by second half of the decade the anti Nazi German group that called themselves the Churchill Group consisted of only himself, Duncan Sandys and Brendan Bracken.
Churchill received information from inside sources including his neighbour, Major Desmond Morton, with Ramsay MacDonald’s approval.
Lord Swinton the Secretary of State for Air responsible for Britain air defences in the lead up to war also passed information to Churchill at the time.
Churchill was a fierce critic of what he seen as Neville Chamberlain’s appeasement of Adolf Hitler and in private letters to Lloyd George and Lord Moyne just before the Munich Agreement, he wrote that the government was faced with a choice between “war and shame” and that having chosen shame would later get war on less favourable terms.
Hitler would later bomb Holland and invade Poland before Chamberlain declared war. The Nazi parties reasoning for these invasions were national defence and security. Upon declaring war a period known as the phoney war begun.
On 10 May 1940, hours before the German invasion of France by a lightning advance through the Low Countries, it became clear that, following failure in Norway, the country had no confidence in Chamberlain’s prosecution of the war and so Chamberlain resigned. The commonly accepted version of events states that Lord Halifax turned down the post of prime minister because he believed he could not govern effectively as a member of the House of Lords instead of the House of Commons. Although a prime minister does not traditionally advise the King on a prime minister’s own successor, Chamberlain wanted someone who would command the support of all three major parties in the House of Commons. A meeting between Chamberlain, Halifax, Churchill and David Margesson, the government Chief Whip, led to the recommendation of Churchill, and, as constitutional monarch, George VI asked Churchill to be prime minister. Churchill’s first act was to write to Chamberlain to thank him for his support.
Chamberlain had long enjoyed excellent health, except for occasional attacks of gout, but by July 1940, he was in almost constant pain. He sought treatment, and later that month entered hospital for surgery. Surgeons discovered that he was suffering from terminal bowel cancer, but they concealed it from him, instead telling him that he would not require further surgery. Chamberlain resumed work in mid-August. He returned to his office on 9 September. However, renewed pain, compounded by the night-time bombing of London which forced him to go to an air raid shelter and denied him rest, sapped his energy, and he left London for the last time on 19 September, returning to Highfield Park in Heckfield. He offered his resignation to Churchill on 22 September. The Prime Minister was initially reluctant to accept; but as both men realised that Chamberlain would never return to work, Churchill finally allowed him to resign. The Prime Minister asked if Chamberlain would accept the highest order of British chivalry, the Order of the Garter, of which his brother had been a member. Chamberlain refused. He said he would “prefer to die plain ‘Mr. Chamberlain’ like my father before me, unadorned by any title”
9 November 1940 at the age of 71Neville Chamberlain died.
A few days before his death, Neville Chamberlain wrote,
So far as my personal reputation is concerned, I am not in the least disturbed about it. The letters which I am still receiving in such vast quantities so unanimously dwell on the same point, namely without Munich the war would have been lost and the Empire destroyed in 1938 … I do not feel the opposite view … has a chance of survival. Even if nothing further were to be published giving the true inside story of the past two years I should not fear the historian’s verdict.
Neville Chamberlain was not the only one to do what he could to avoid a full scale world war.
Files that were released in 2008 reveal that shortly after the outbreak of war Britain’s Foreign Secretary Edward Wood, 1st Earl of Halifax helped with the travel arrangements of John Lonsdale Bryans, who believed he could bring down Hitler by making contact with prominent anti-Nazi Germans including Ulrich von Hassell, the former German ambassador in Rome.
Initially Lonsdale Bryans thought he could drum up support for an anti-Nazi coup in Germany. But he subsequently changed tactic and tried to contact Adolf Hitler in a bid to negotiate a peace.
Halifax met Hitler in 1937 and was criticised for being too close to the cause of appeasement. Shortly after Churchill took over as Prime Minister in 1940 he was moved from the Foreign Office to the British Embassy in Washington.
Hitler was always keen to do business with Britain and was hesitant to attack but on the 7th of September 1940 after numerous attacks on German cities and civilians by British forces Germany retaliated. An over looked fact is that throughout World War 2 British and American forces killed over ten times the amount of German civilians as German forces killed British civilians.
Historian David Olusoga said he believes Winston Churchill was complicit in a number of atrocities committed in Africa in the early 20th century. Speaking at the Oxfordshire Literary Festival Mr. Olusoga, who co-presents Civilisations on the BBC alongside Simon Schama and Mary Beard, says claims about the darker side of the former Prime Minister’s past are often drowned out by his status as a wartime leader. Mr. Olusoga argued that although Churchill was remembered as being a great politician, he was “largely responsible” for war crimes in Africa.
A number of books claim that in 1940 Winston Churchill received intelligence informing him that Coventry not London was going to be targeted. Because of this intelligence Winston Churchill returned to London that night and according to one account instead of warning the nation that Coventry was being targeted he put on a charade in which he claimed claiming he would not ask the British public to do anything he would not be prepared to do himself.
An estimated 568 people were killed in the raid (the exact figure was never precisely confirmed), with another 863 badly injured and 393 sustaining lesser injuries.
In his 1974 book The Ultra Secret, Group Captain F. W. Winterbotham asserted that the British government had advance warning of the attack from Ultra: intercepted German radio messages encrypted with the Enigma cipher machine and decoded by British cryptanalysts at Bletchley Park. He further claimed that Winston Churchill ordered that no defensive measures should be taken to protect Coventry, lest the Germans suspect that their cipher had been broken.
Hitler believed Churchill to be an idiotic drunk but he was keen on building business and political relations with Great Britain something that Churchill was dead against. Churchill was a Zionist as he admitted numerous times he once said “I am a Zionist, let me make that clear. I was one of the original ones after the Balfour Declaration and I have worked faithfully for it.”
Following the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in World War I, the British assumed control of Palestine. In November 1917, the British government issued the Balfour Declaration, announcing its intention to facilitate the “establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.”
The Balfour Declaration was a public statement issued by the British government during World War I announcing support for the establishment of a “national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine, then an Ottoman region with a minority Jewish population (around 3–5% of the total). It read:
His Majesty’s government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country
The declaration was contained in a letter dated 2 November 1917 from the United Kingdom’s Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild, a leader of the British Jewish community, for transmission to the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland. The text of the declaration was published in the press on 9 November 1917.
Winston Churchill was funded by Jewish and Zionist figures and determined to bring the Jewish people back to what he and many other Zionists believe is their homeland, Israel.
In 1947, the newly formed United Nations accepted the idea to partition Palestine into a zone for the Jews (Israel) and a zone for the Arabs (Palestine). With this United Nations proposal, the British withdrew from the region on May 14th 1948. Since the withdrawal of Britain Palestine has eroded as Israel has grown.
The truth is that Britain and Winston Churchill committed war crimes and vicious acts against humanity that at least rivalled the war crimes committed by the Nazi Party at the time. And these actions were taken to protect Britain or the British people but to oppress a movement that made certain groups of rich individuals feel uncomfortable.
One of the most barbaric crimes committed throughout World War 2 was the Bengali Famine. The Bengal famine of 1943 was a major famine in the Bengal province in British India during World War II.
The amount of people that died from starvation, malaria and other diseases aggravated by malnutrition, population displacement, unsanitary conditions and lack of health care is estimated to be between 2 and 3 million in Bengal alone along with up to another 29 million in India as millions of tons of wheat were exported to Britain as famine raged in India..
Though the famine was caused through a mixture of problems, the diversion of millions of tons of wheat to Britain is accepted by most historians to be the main cause of it.
In late 1942 Bengal was affected by a series of natural disasters. First, the winter rice crop was afflicted by a severe outbreak of fungal brown spot disease. Then, on 16–17 October a cyclone and three storm surges in October ravaged croplands, destroyed houses and killed thousands, at the same time dispersing high levels of fungal spores across the region and increasing the spread of the crop disease
The Bengal cyclone came through the Bay of Bengal, landing on the coastal areas of Midnapore. It killed 14,500 people and 190,000 cattle; while rice paddy stocks in the hands of cultivators, consumers, and dealers were destroyed. It also created local atmospheric conditions that contributed to an increased incidence of malaria. The three storm surges which followed the cyclone destroyed the seawalls of Midnapore and flooded large areas of Contai and Tamluk. Waves swept an area of 450 square miles (1,200 km2), floods affected 400 square miles (1,000 km2), and wind and torrential rain damaged 3,200 square miles (8,300 km2). For nearly 2.5 million Bengalis, the accumulative damage of the cyclone and storm surges to homes, crops and livelihoods was catastrophic.
Corpses lay scattered over several thousand square miles of devastated land. 7,400 villages were partly or wholly destroyed by the storm, and standing flood waters remained for weeks in at least 1,600 villages. Cholera, dysentery and other water-borne diseases flourished. 527,000 houses and 1,900 schools were lost. Over 1000 square miles of the most fertile paddy land in the province was entirely destroyed, and the standing crop over an additional 3000 square miles was damaged.
Following these events, official forecasts of crop yields predicted a significant shortfall. Traders warned of an impending famine, but the Bengal Government did not act on these predictions.
Talking about the famine he had played a huge role in engineering in 1943, Winston Churchill said: “I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion. The famine was their own fault for breeding like rabbits.”
Adam Jones, editor of the Journal of Genocide Research, calls Churchill “a genuine genocidaire”, noting that the British leader called Indians a “foul race” in this period and said that the British air force chief should “send some of his surplus bombers to destroy them.”
Arthur Herman, author of Churchill and Gandhi, contends, ‘The real cause was the fall of Burma to the Japanese, which cut off India’s main supply of rice imports when domestic sources fell short … though it is true that Churchill opposed diverting food supplies and transports from other theatres to India to cover the shortfall.
In response to an urgent request by the Secretary of State for India (Leo Amery) and the Viceroy of India (Field Marshal Archibald Percival Wavell), to release food stocks for India, Churchill responded with a telegram to Wavell asking, if food was so scarce, “why Gandhi hadn’t died yet”. In July 1940, newly in office, he reportedly welcomed reports of the emerging conflict between the Muslim League and the Indian Congress, hoping “it would be bitter and bloody”
On the 8th May 1945 Victory in Europe was celebrated.
But even before VE day Churchill faced a new problem from a different enemy. A dispute with Britain over French mandates Syria and Lebanon known as the Levant which quickly developed into a major diplomatic incident. In May, de Gaulle sent more French troops to re-establish their presence provoking an outbreak of demonstrations and protests. On 20 May 1945, French troops opened fire on demonstrators in Damascus with artillery and dropped bombs from the air. On the 31 May, with the death toll now exceeding a thousand Syrians, Churchill decided to act and sent Chairman of the Provisional Government of France and the Co Prince of Andorra Charles de Gaulle an ultimatum saying, “In order to avoid a collision between British and French forces, we request you immediately to order French troops to cease fire and withdraw to their barracks”.
The request was ignored by both de Gaulle and the French forces and thus Churchill ordered British troops and armoured cars under General Bernard Paget to invade Syria from nearby Transjordan. The invasion went ahead and the British swiftly moved in cutting the French General Fernand Oliva-Roget’s telephone line with his base at Beirut. Eventually, heavily outnumbered, Oliva-Roget ordered his men back to their bases near the coast who were then escorted by the British. A furious row then broke out between the British and French governments.
Churchill’s relationship with de Gaulle was at this time rock bottom in spite of his efforts to preserve French interests at Yalta and a visit to Paris the previous year On 10 November 1944, Churchill flew to Paris to a reception by de Gaulle and the two together were greeted by cheers from thousands of people. Harold Nicolson stated that Anthony Eden told him that “not for one moment did Winston stop crying, and that he could have filled buckets by the time he received the Freedom of Paris.” He said “they yelled for Churchill in a way that he has never heard any crowd yell before. At an official luncheon de Gaulle said, “It is true that we would not have seen [the liberation] if our old and gallant ally England, and all the British dominions under precisely the impulsion and inspiration of those we are honouring today, had not deployed the extraordinary determination to win, and that magnificent courage which saved the freedom of the world. There is no French man or woman who is not touched to the depths of their hearts and souls by this.”. Despite this just two months later Churchill told a colleague that he believed that de Gaulle was “a great danger to peace and for Great Britain. After five years of experience, I am convinced that he is the worst enemy of France in her troubles … he is one of the greatest dangers to European peace…. I am sure that in the long run no understanding will be reached with General de Gaulle”. In France, there were accusations that Britain had armed the demonstrators and de Gaulle raged against ‘Churchill’s ultimatum’, saying that “the whole thing stank of oil”.
Less than two months later Winston Churchill lost an election by a landslide to Clement Atlee’s Labour Party.The Labour party gained 393 seats to the Conservatives 213.
Winston Church (the Greatest Britain of all time according) was a drunk in fact even many of his famous speeches were written with professional help and read out to the public by a Winston Churchill Impersonator called Norman Shelley; the reason for this was because Churchill himself would be in no condition to read at the time of the broadcast due to his alcohol addiction. He was a war monger and a puppet that displayed a psychopathic disregard for human life and the fact that his actions led to the death of literally millions of Indians and Bengali people.
The collapse of British imperial power was all but complete by the mid-1960s and most Historians agree it can be traced directly to the impact of World War Two.
Britain had survived the war, but its wealth, prestige and authority had been severely reduced.
It also erased the old balance of power on which British security – at home and abroad – had largely depended.
Although Britain was one of the victorious allies, the defeat of Germany had been mainly the work of Soviet and American power, while that of Japan had been an almost entirely American.
Churchill continued as leader of the opposition for six years before losing a general election in 1950 despite losing.
In 1951 the Labour government called the general election for Thursday 25 October hoping to increase their parliamentary majority. However, despite winning the popular vote, the Labour Party was defeated by the Conservative Party who had won the most seats. This election marked the beginning of the Labour Party’s thirteen-year spell in opposition, and the return of Winston Churchill as Prime Minister.This was the final general election to be held with George VI as monarch; as he died the following year on 6 February, and was succeeded by his daughter, Elizabeth II.
Less than one year into his second term Winston Churchill faced a new problem. In 1952 beganthe Mau Mau Uprising. The Mau Mau was made up of mainly the Kikuyu people, Meru people and Embu people,who fought against the white European colonist-settlers in Kenya, the British Army, and the local Kenya Regiment which was British colonists, local auxiliary militia, and pro–British Kikuyu people.
Members of the Kikuyu tribe were detained in camps, since described as “Britain’s gulags” or concentration camps, where they allege they were systematically tortured and suffered serious sexual assault.
The capture of rebel leader, Field Marshal Dedan Kimathi, on 21 October 1956, signalled the defeat of the Mau Mau, however despite the capture, the rebellion survived until after Kenya’s independence from Britain, driven mainly by the Meru units.
One of the last Mau Mau generals, Baimuingi, was killed shortly after Kenya attained self-rule.
Estimates of the deaths vary widely: historian David Anderson estimates there were 20,000, whereas Caroline Elkins believes up to 100,000 could have died.
It is believed that Churchill’s, government underestimated the challenges that the Mau Mau uprising would bring. Suppressing the Mau Mau Uprising in the Kenyan colony cost Britain £55 million.
In 1937, he told the Palestine Royal Commission: “I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place.”
Churchill certainly believed in racial hierarchies and eugenics, says John Charmley, author of Churchill: The End of Glory. In Churchill’s view, white protestant Christians were at the top, above white Catholics, while Indians were higher than Africans, he adds. “Churchill saw himself and Britain as being the winners in a social Darwinian hierarchy.”
In his later years Churchill is believed to have suffered from Alzheimer’s disease and suffered ten stokes the first of which came in while he was on holiday in France 1949. He is also rumoured to have suffered from depression that worsened in his later years.
On 24 January 1965 Winston Churchill died. Churchill’s funeral plan had been initiated in 1953, after he suffered a major stroke, under the name Operation Hope Not. The purpose was to commemorate Churchill “on a scale befitting his position in history”, as Queen Elizabeth II declared.
The funeral was the largest state funeral in world history up to that time, with representatives from 112 nations though China was not represented. In Europe, 350 million people, including 25 million in Britain, watched the funeral on television, and only the Republic of Ireland did not broadcast it live.
Upon his death he would take many mysteries and rumours to the grave with him. The British public still did not really know or understand who Winston Churchill was. To find out who he was we need to look at where he came from.
A 2010 book titled The Churchill’s: A Family Portrait by Celia and John Lee claims that Winston Churchill’s mother ‘had a two year affair with King Edward VII.’
The couple was given access to the Churchill family documents and private letters saved by Peregrine Churchill, Winston Churchill’s nephew.
Among the papers were intimate notes from the King when he was Prince Albert Edward of Wales which he sent to Lady Randolph after the death of her husband Lord Randolph.
Some believe that Winston Churchill was a Secret service agent.
In the summer of 1871, Leonard Jerome rented a small cottage on the Isle of Wight. He was joined by his wife and daughters Clara, Jennie and Leonie. That was when the 3 girls were first introduced to Albert, Prince of Wales: As she describes in “Lady” Randolph Churchill, Reminiscences. p. 29.
By February 1874 Jennie was pregnant with Winston and a “shotgun” wedding was absolutely necessary to establish legitimacy for the royal offspring.
The baby was born to Lady Randolph Churchill on November 30, 1874. His full name was Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill.
The Prince did not want this to be public knowledge at the time due to his marriage to Alexandra of Denmark was Queen of the United Kingdom and the British Dominions and Empress of India
The baby was said to be born premature because 9 months had not elapsed since the “shotgun” wedding.
Forming this new Translantic alliance was not cheap. Lord Randolph demaned and received a princely sum for adoping the son of the Prince of Wales:
There were however two difficulties. First, Leonard Jerome, true to the Duke’s descriptions of the hazards of his occupation, was in a speculative downturn. He had been badly mauled by the plunge of the New York stock exchange of that year (1873). Second, he claimed to hold advanced New World ideas about the financial rights of married women. (This was before the British Married Women’s Property Act of 1882 gave women any property rights against their husbands.) The Duke assumed that whatever settlement could be obtained would be under the exclusive control of his son. Jerome thought it should be settled on his daughter. This led to a good deal of haggling which went on into the spring of 1874. Eventually a compromise was reached, by which Jerome settled a sum of £50,000 (approximately £2.5 million at present values), producing an income of £2,000 a year, with a half of both capital and income belonging, to the husband and a half to the wife. The Duke settled another £I,I00 a year for life on Randolph which gave the couple the equivalent of a present-day income of a little more than £150,000 a year, a sum which guaranteed that they would live constantly above their income and be always in debt. (Roy Jenkins writes in Churchill: A Hagiography, pp. 6-7).
Another reason for recommending Lord Randolph as a surrogate father was the fact that he had syphilis and could not father children. Lord Randolph had a timely death in 1895, and he left no money in his will to his adopted children Winston and Jack.
Albert, became King Edward VII upon the death of Queen Victoria in 1901. His brief reign is called the Edwardian Era.
This makes well know Jack the Ripper suspect Prince Albert Victor Winston Churchill’s step brother.
Prince Albert Victor was known to be unintelligent and deaf
He was the eldest child of the Prince and Princess of Wales (later King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra) and grandson of the reigning British monarch, Queen Victoria. From the time of his birth, he was second in the line of succession to the British throne, but never became king: he died before his father and his grandmother, the Queen.
What is not so well known is that Prince Albert Victor is not the only Jack the Ripper suspect connected to Winston Churchill.
The Jack the Ripper murders of 1888 remain one of Britain’s most notorious unsolved murder cases.
The idea that Prince Albert Victor had something to do with the murders is unrealistic.
In his book, ‘The Falsification of History – Our Distorted Reality’ John Hamer writes.
The story begins in the late summer of 1888, the heyday of Queen Victoria’s reign, in the gas-lit streets of London, when a woman’s horrifically mutilated body was discovered in a tawdry slum street in the Whitechapel area of East London….
On the evening of the 31st August 1888, the body of Mary Ann Nicholls, a common prostitute, was found prostrate on a pavement. She had been brutally hacked to death, her throat having been slit. Devastating cuts to her torso exposed her internal organs. She was the first of five victims of the now legendary killer, ‘Jack the Ripper’.
The so-called ‘Ripper’ murders came under the jurisdiction of the London Metropolitan Police Force and in particular an Inspector by the name of Frederick George Abberline.
It is important to note that the diaries of Frederick Abberline did not see light of day until around 70 years after the unsolved murders. They were in the possession of Walter Sickert, art tutor to Prince Albert Victor, the Duke of Clarence.
Queen Victoria was the reigning monarch at the time.
As well as his membership of the lodge, Eddy was also a regular ‘customer’ at a homosexual-paedophile brothel in Cleveland Street, London and indiscreetly instigated a series of explicit love-letters with a young boy employed at these most vile of premises.
The well-known Satanist, Aleister Crowley had these letters in his possession for many years but eventually they were lost or more likely destroyed. Eddy had also made a young Catholic ‘commoner’ of Irish descent by the name of Annie Elizabeth Crook, pregnant with his child.
Eddy had foolishly married her in a clandestine church service and this in effect barred him from ever becoming king as British royals are not permitted to marry Catholics, let alone a commoner bearing an illegitimate child.
In 1883, Eddy’s mother, Princess Alexandra, had asked the young painter Walter Sickert to introduce Eddy to the artistic and literary life of London.
Sickert’s studio was at 15 Cleveland Street near to Tottenham Court Road in north London. He duly introduced the teenage Prince to many of the area’s ‘bohemian types’, including the theatrical friends he had made when he had been a minor member of the Lyceum Company.
Sickert also introduced Eddy to one of his models, a pretty Irish Catholic girl, the afore-mentioned Annie Crook who lived nearby at 6 Cleveland Street and who worked by day in a local tobacconist’s shop.
They fell for each other and, according to Sickert, went through two clandestine marriage ceremonies, one Anglican and one Catholic. Soon afterwards Annie became pregnant and her employer needed someone to fill in for her during her confinement.
Walter Sickert was asked if he knew anyone suitable and, after consulting friends, found a young girl called Mary Jean Kelly from the Providence Row Night Refuge for Women in Whitechapel.
For some months, Mary worked alongside Annie Crook in the shop and the two became friends. In due course, on the 18th April 1885, Annie gave birth to Eddy’s daughter, Alice Margaret, in the Marylebone Workhouse.
When she returned home, her new friend Mary Kelly moved in as the child’s nursemaid. Mary also worked as a prostitute in the evenings to supplement her meagre income.
Naturally, Eddy absolutely enraged the establishment with his ‘illicit’ marriage which threatened to spark a constitutional crisis of major proportions. So, as is always the case, the monarchy set in motion a huge cover-up operation.
Annie was kidnapped from the shop where she worked and at the same time Eddy was confined to Buckingham Palace.
Fortunately, fearing the worst, Annie had given the child, Alice to Walter Sickert for safekeeping shortly before she was forcefully taken to Guy’s Hospital in London.
She remained there for five months and whilst she was there, Sir William Gull, the Queen’s personal physician performed a partial frontal lobotomy on her, in effect rendering her docile and compliant and thus easily controlled by these inhuman monsters.
Certified insane by Gull, Annie lived for the rest of her life in institutions, spending her last days in the Lunacy Observation ward of St George’s Union Workhouse, Chelsea and dying there in obscurity in early 1920 at the age of 57.
MARY KELLY’S BLACKMAIL
There the matter might have ended, but for Mary Kelly’s greed. Back in Whitechapel, Mary had befriended three other local prostitutes to whom she boasted of her ‘royal connections.’ In the spring of 1888 the quartet hatched a plan to demand money from Walter Sickert, threatening to otherwise make the story public.
She had not fully comprehended the fact that not only was she in effect attempting to blackmail royalty but because of the Freemasonic connection she was also holding-to-ransom a group of psychopathic murderers who would literally stop at nothing and had the means to kill with impunity whilst enjoying the ‘protection’ of people in high places.
Sickert immediately passed word to Eddy who informed his father. The Prince of Wales discussed the threat in the greatest secrecy with trusted fellow Masons in the Royal Alpha Lodge. A special meeting was arranged at the Lodge by the Royal Masons known as the ‘Princes of the Blood Royal.’ They agreed to form a ‘hunting party’ to literally hunt-down and kill the hapless girls as punishment for their audacity and as a Masonic blood-sacrifice.
The ‘hunting party’ was drawn exclusively from the Royal Alpha Masonic Lodge and included Sir William Gull, Eddy’s former Cambridge University tutor J. K. Stephen and Sir Charles Warren, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police (who took no active part in the killings but who helped facilitate the plot and expedite the cover-up.) To drive them about their sordid business, they recruited a coachman who had previously betrayed Prince Eddy’s indiscretions to the Royals, one John Netley.
Warren provided information on the girls’ whereabouts using his privileged position in the police force. Sir William Gull prepared grapes injected with opium, which would be offered to the victims to subdue them so that the dastardly deed could take place with a minimum of fuss.
It was arranged that John Netley, the coach driver and a particularly nasty character was to be the ‘getaway driver.’ The ‘lookout’ would be J.K. Stephen, a cousin of Virginia Woolf and another Freemason with royal links. The murders were planned to occur within Gull’s carriage – away from prying eyes.
It should be noted that Abberline’s diaries confirmed that the modus operandi was that the murders were planned and performed by more than one person according to Masonic ritual, similar to a fox-hunt. These are facts which were never allowed to come to light.
THE RING LEADER
So, who was the ringleader of this murderous gang? None other than the prominent Freemason, Secretary of State for India, the Leader of the House of Commons and the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lord Randolph Spencer-Churchill, father of the future prime minister, Winston Churchill.
Churchill was not only the ‘brains’ behind the entire operation, but he was also personally responsible for the cutting of Masonic emblems and symbols into the bodies of the victims, whilst William Gull’s skilled surgeon’s hands of performed the organ removals.
The assassins set about discovering the blackmailers’ whereabouts with ‘insider’ help from Warren and then systematically plotted their executions. The ritualistic, murderous spree began on the 31st August 1888 with Mary Ann Nicholls as their first victim and continued with the killing of Annie Chapman on the 8th September.
In turn each woman was lured inside the coach, then killed and mutilated in the ritualistic way that the three ‘Juwes’, Jubela, Jubelo and Jubelum, the murderers of Hiram Abiff, were executed in the old Masonic legend. Their throats were ‘cut across’, their bodies torn open and their entrails ‘thrown over’ the left shoulder.
On the 30th September, there were two further killings but on that night things did not go smoothly. As the murderers were dumping that night’s first victim, Lizzie Stride, in Berner Street, they were interrupted and had to abandon her corpse before its ritual mutilation had been completed.
More alarming still, the night’s second victim, Catherine Eddowes, was, according to Sickert, killed in error. It was learned that poor Catherine had for some time lived with a man called John Kelly, had often used his surname and so had been wrongly identified as the blackmailer-in-chief, Mary Kelly.
That mistake nearly led to the group’s undoing. In the belief that this was to be the climactic move of their campaign, the group had already arranged Catherine’s corpse, more completely mutilated than any of her predecessors, in Mitre Square opposite the Masonic Temple and close to the Whitechapel Road.
They had chalked on a nearby wall a Masonic slogan to act as a postscript to the whole sordid affair. A policeman copied it down into his notebook and it said:
“The Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for nothing.”
In the meantime, Prince Eddy, his mental health by now completely shattered, was given into the care of the Earl of Strathmore who owned Glamis Castle in Scotland. The royal family then blatantly lied to the world and announced that Eddy had sadly passed away at the age of only 28, on the 14th January 1892 due to influenza, but of course Eddy was still alive and being held in Balmoral Castle having not yet made the final move to Glamis.
Balmoral is approximately 1000 feet (300 metres) above sea-level and as such is partly surrounded by steep cliffs. This was the intended site for the planned murder of Eddy to be undertaken by Randolph Churchill and John Netley the coachman. The prince was pushed from the cliff-top but somehow managed to survive his fall and after the passage of two days had endeavoured to crawl all the way back to Balmoral where he was found at the door by his disbelieving hosts.
It was decided after this that the best option would be to just incarcerate him at Glamis for the rest of his life and the Earl of Strathmore agreed to undertake this task on behalf of the royals in return for one simple favour. The favour he stipulated was that one of his daughters be allowed to marry a future king of England.
Prince Eddy died in 1933, forty one years after his ‘official’ death date and during this time, his mother visited him only once, but took a photograph of him which she apparently sent to her cousin. This photograph is still in existence and shows a much older Eddy thoughtfully painting a picture which would sadly never be seen by anyone outside the walls of Glamis Castle.
The pact between Strathmore and the royal family was eventually fulfilled in 1923 when Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon (his daughter, b. 1900) married the future King George VI of England after originally being betrothed to his brother, the former King Edward VIII (he of abdication fame).
Having really enjoyed my work for the previous 5 years working with pupils in a Local Authority EBD (Emotional & Behavioural difficulties) School, I never would have imagined that morning what would later transpire and how it would change my life irreversibly.
I worked with pupils on a one to one basis to help them catch up, as many had either truanted, been excluded or had been unable to keep up in the classroom.
Just before it began, I felt as happy in my work as anyone could. Believing that I worked among honest, trustworthy and professional colleagues. Some I would have considered to be friends that I trusted.
I was soon to find out that this was far from the case.
I had noticed one boy, ….. had been out of class a lot. So when he came in to do his work with me I raised this with him. It went something like this..
Me: “What the heck are you doing being sent out of class, when we are working for you to catch up?”
Him: “I only get sent out of English”
Me: “English Matters!”
Him: “If I stay in English, I’ll be gay”
Me: “How will English make you gay?”
Him: “Mr ………. is a child molester, so I throw a chair as soon as I go in so I get sent out then he can’t touch me.
Me: “Do you want to tell me about it?”
Him: “He makes me, …. and …. sit at the back of the class on 3 separate desks, he sits on the chair next to us, pretends to look at our work and touches us under the desk”
Me: “Don’t worry, you’ve done the right thing. I do have to pass this on though”
I advised him to just finish his work, told him that I’d be back in a few moments because I had to inform the Child Protection Officer who was also the DH (Deputy Head). I reported this disclosure to DH who said he would inform H (Headteacher) and that H could go back to my work, which I did.
I had no sooner re-seated myself at my desk when H burst into the room, pointed at me and angrily directed me “You, My room. Now!” Following him to his room, I was thinking, Somehow he’d gotten the wromg end of the stick, that he thought the allegation was about me. So I was not too bothered at that point.
Into his room we go and I’m starting to explain “The allegation isn’t about me!” He pointed at me and spoke in a threatening tone “Shut up and forget about it if you value your job” I was shocked beyond shocked. the ground had just disappeared. I tried reasoning that my contract of employment clearly stated that I must comply with the Child Protection Policy and ensure any disclosure is reported and recorded. He said “So you’re snowballing this and putting yourself outside of my team?” I told him I couldn’t just forget it, I needed it to be recorded. As I left work that day, I felt in an impossible position. I didn’t know quite what to do. It troubled me greatly throughout the whole night. I decided to take the day off (the day after the disclosure) I felt quite ill actually and called in sick. I took myself off to the UNISON office as I was a member of the union. I spoke to a man there who was very helpful, he advised me to write the account down, to give it to them, they would then stamp it with the union stamp and send it on so it could not be ignored. I did as he advised, thinking that the union involvement would help resolve all this. As I left the union office, the man I had been dealing with told me to keep him informed and to let him know should anything happen as a result of the letter.
The next day I went into work, H took me into his office stating “This is not a punishment but you are not needed in that job anymore” He was smirking “You will just go wherever you are needed or photocopying” telling me that another member of staff would do my job from now on. Bear in mind that I was the only person who held that position in the school.
What a difference a day makes. I now found myself going into a workplace where suddenly my friendly colleagues wouldn’t even look at me, let alone speak to me. I would be sent to a classroom to be told by the teacher “I don’t need you in here” emphasis being on the word ‘you’.
I also contacted Social Services (the pupil that had made the initial disclosure was in Local Authority care), the Police, who told me to leave it in the hands of the school and called the NSPCC, they also said to leave it in the hands of the school. I had applied to be a foster carer and had just completed the vetting process successfully. The process had involved interviewing my colleagues, line managers and employers. I was told I had received glowing references. Now, only weeks later H was claiming that I had an attitude problem, that I was hostile and aggressive with staff, pupils and parents. H stated he did not like my attitude. In fact H and DH took me into my room to tell me this, they later stated that this was a disciplinary.
My job had been taken from me, a job that I’d earned praise from OFSTED shortly beforehand. So I went back to the union after work to see the rep who was dealing with my case. Surprisingly I was told he didn’t work there any more, he had moved. The day before he had told me to go back to see him if anything happened but now he wasn’t there. I had a new union rep appointed who arranged a meeting in the council offices with a member of staff from the Department of Education. My doctor had declared me unfit for work due to work related stress due to the various symptoms I was suffering.
As I waited in the meeting room I overheard some talking outside the door, the LEA (Local Education Authority) representative was a woman whom I heard speaking quietly to the rep “We can’t sack her while she’s on the sick, you need to get her back to work” They came into the room and after the initial niceties the rep advised me to go back to work. I left the meeting and rang the GMB union desperate for advice, who kindly offered to take on the case. The GMB area rep arranged a meeting with H at the school.At this meeting one of the issues the rep attempted to resolve was that H had stated that I had been in school the day after the disclosure when an investigation had taken place. I had in fact taken that day off sick and visited UNISON. The rep and I were both shocked to hear H brazenly laugh as he told us “I am the boss of this school and the staff here will say whatever I tell them to say”
As we left the meeting the rep advised me to resign, this was a clear case of constructive dismissal he believed. I followed his advice and resigned. It was impossible to continue working there anyway. The list of things that my colleagues did to make my life unpleasant I will leave out to shorten this rather lengthy story. Colleagues who had appeared to be compassionate and caring people now telling me (in secret) that they had mortgages so they couldn’t do what I was doing, they didn’t want what was happening to me to happen to them. I did remind them that I was a single parent who also had a mortgage but that failed to sway them to tell the truth.
The GMB union appointed a solicitor to take the case to tribunal. The case took two days during which time I believed the case would be easily won. The contradictions were obvious, one example, DH was asked whether I had been in work the day after the disclosure. He said that I had. It was then pointed out to him that in his written statement he had stated that I had not been in work the day after the disclosure. He was asked why he had written that I had not been in work if he was now saying that I had, his reply was “Because I felt like it at the time”. These contradictions happened repeatedly throughout the two days hence I believed that justice would prevail. How wrong I was.
The verdict was that I had decided to leave.
Basically that I had tried to damage a colleague’s career and take a tidy sum with me. As we left the court the union rep, who had always been very supportive was astonished at the verdict saying “We should have had the press in there, they would have had field day”. I was advised to appeal but my application for an appeal was refused.
I had done nothing wrong, I was now jobless, could not pay my mortgage, could no longer afford a car. The prospect of getting another job after taking your employer to tribunal and losing is not good.
Worst of all, I fear I left a clear playing field, it was now obvious that no other staff member would speak up. The boy told me he wished he had never told me, because now they would get rid of me. Now I feared that none of the pupils would dare speak up again.
The story has been compacted because it is so long.
A whistleblower’s life is not a happy one. They do shoot the messenger.
I believe the school closed for around 18 months afterwards for ‘refurb’. And that I have to date reported the disclosure 4 times to the police. The last time was around 2 years ago and followed my repeated online reporting. Two officers came and took a statement and nothing since.
There was also a strange ‘leaving’ of the teacher who preceded the teacher named by pupils. She was a very professional older Scottish woman who was really good with the kids, strict but fair. She stopped coming in to work, when I asked if she was ill, she was rarely off work. I was told never to mention her again as she wouldn’t be coming back. I was told to empty her desk into a box and to put the box outside the main doors. I wondered what the heck she could have done, I couldn’t imagine her doing anything wrong at all. My stuff was put outside in a box outside also, and I wasn’t allowed through the doors either.
My latest video is looking at the life of psychopathic war criminal Winston Churchill. I really didn’t expect any issues with advertising for this video because the video contains no swearing, no nudity, sex and its factual. I was wrong! Like my last feature length video (Britain’s Paedophile elite) Google have confirmed by manual review that the video is NOT suitable for advertisers. They have also not informed my subscribers and all the usual bullshit.
I have to be honest this used to piss me off! I have kids and try to make something for them not for myself but I am constantly being attacked by Google and their corporate and government advertisers.
Anybody that has read some of my older blogs will know the frustration and anger that this used to cause me. I’m glad to say I’m past the stage of giving a fuck! In fact I’m honoured. Forced suppression and oppression is an admission of guilt and fear!
The “almighty powerful” are powerless! Yeah they can refuse payment, leech from small YouTube channels but they can’t stop us doing this shit and they can’t stop people watching this shit. Plus they (as well as me along with other small channels that have the nerve to make videos that look controversial subjects) are the ones losing out.
The reason I have Bruce Lee quotes all over the blog is because he nails it. I don’t need their money, I’m still here, still fighting them and they can’t do shit about it. Other than “we are not paying you for that” thats cool pissing off these people is rewarding enough.